Statistical methods for test and biomarker evaluation studies: A clinical chemistry series

Clinical Chemistry

Volumn 58, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1273-1274

  Boyd, James C ^a   Rifai, Nader ^b   Annesley, Thomas ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EDITORIAL; PERFORMANCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL;

EID: 84865775289     PISSN: 00099147     EISSN: 15308561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.192252     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
2. Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 1993;39:561-77.
3. Cook NR. Statistical evaluation of prognostic versus diagnostic models: beyond the ROC curve. Clin Chem 2008;54:17-23.
4. Linnet K, Bossuyt PM, Moons KG, Reitsma JB. Quantifying the accuracy of a diagnostic test or marker. Clin Chem 2012;58:1292-1301.
5. Moons KG, de Groot JA, Linnet K, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM. Quantifying the added value of a diagnostic test or marker. Clin Chem. Forthcoming 2012;58.
6. Reitsma JB, Moons KG, Bossuyt PM, Linnet K. Systematic reviews of studies quantifying the accuracy of diagnostic tests and markers. Clin Chem. Forthcoming 2012;58.
7. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Linnet K, Moons KG. Beyond diagnostic accuracy: the clinical utility of diagnostic tests. Clin Chem. Forthcoming 2012;58.