Gamma phase locking modulated by phonological contrast during auditory comprehension in reading disability

NeuroReport

Volumn 23, Issue 14, 2012, Pages 851-856

  Han, Jooman ^a   Mody, Maria ^a,b   Ahlfors, Seppo P ^a,b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MIT DIVISION OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

gamma band oscillations; magnetoencephalography; phase locking value; phonological processing; sentence context; speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSLEXIA; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; HEARING; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; OSCILLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL SULCUS;

ADOLESCENT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; COMPREHENSION; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE;

EID: 84865759436     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: 1473558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835818e1     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ramus F. Developmental dyslexia: Specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction? Curr Opin Neurobiol 2003; 13:212-218.
2. Mody M, Studdert-Kennedy M, Brady S. Speech perception deficits in poor readers: Auditory processing or phonological coding? J Exp Child Psychol 1997; 64:199-231.
3. Shaywitz SE, Fletcher JM, Holahan JM, Shneider AE, Marchione KE, Stuebing KK, et al. Persistence of dyslexia: The Connecticut Longitudinal Study at adolescence. Pediatrics 1999; 104:1351-1359.
4. Chiappe P, Chiappe DL, Gottardo A. Vocabulary, context, and speech perception among good and poor readers. Educ Psychol 2004; 24: 825-843.
5. Perfetti CA, Goldman SR, Hogaboam TW. Reading skill and the identification of words in discourse context. Mem Cognit 1979; 7: 273-282.
6. Bonte ML, Blomert L. Developmental dyslexia: erp correlates of anomalous phonological processing during spoken word recognition. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2004; 21:360-376.
7. Wehner DT, Ahlfors SP, Mody M. Effects of phonological contrast on auditory word discrimination in children with and without reading disability: A magnetoencephalography (MEG) study. Neuropsychologia 2007; 45:3251-3262.
8. Mody M, Wehner DT, Ahlfors SP. Auditory word perception in sentence context in reading-disabled children. Neuroreport 2008; 19:1567-1571.
9. Giraud AL, Poeppel D. Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nat Neurosci 2012; 15:511-517.
10. Singer W, Gray CM. Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annu Rev Neurosci 1995; 18:555-586.
11. Obleser J, Kotz SA. Multiple brain signatures of integration in the comprehension of degraded speech. Neuroimage 2011; 55:713-723.
12. Shahin AJ, Picton TW, Miller LM. Brain oscillations during semantic evaluation of speech. Brain Cogn 2009; 70:259-266.
13. Tavabi K, Embick D, Roberts TP. Spectral-temporal analysis of cortical oscillations during lexical processing. Neuroreport 2011; 22:474-478.
14. Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ. Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp 1999; 8:194-208.
15. Hämä lä inen MS, Ilmoniemi RJ. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Med Biol Eng Comput 1994; 32:35-42.
16. Scott SK, Johnsrude IS. The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends Neurosci 2003; 26:100-107.
17. Hannemann R, Obleser J, Eulitz C. Top-down knowledge supports the retrieval of lexical information from degraded speech. Brain Res 2007; 1153:134-143.