Predicting the response to simultaneous selection: genetic architecture and physiological constraints

Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 2916-2928

  Davidowitz, Goggy ^a   Nijhout, H Frederik ^b   Roff, Derek A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical weight; Growth rate; Interval to cessation of growth; Manduca sexta; Physiological antagonism; Physiological synergism

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; BODY SIZE; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GROWTH RATE; HORMONE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MOTH; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; SELECTION; SYNERGISM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MALE; MOTH; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; MOTHS; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

MANDUCA SEXTA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84865757262     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01644.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allen, B. M. 1918. The results of thyroid removal in the larvae of Rana pipiens. J. Exp. Zool. 24:499-519.
2. Antonovics, J., and P. H. van Tienderen 1991. Ontoecogenophyloconstraints? The chaos of constraint terminology. TREE 6:166-168.
3. Beldade, P., K. Koops, and P. M. Brakefield 2002. Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution. Nature 416:844-847.
4. Bell, A. E., and M. J. Burris 1973. Simultaneous selection for 2 correlated traits in tribolium. Genet. Res. 21:29-46.
5. D'Amico, L. J., G. Davidowitz, and H. F. Nijhout 2001. The developmental and physiological basis of body size evolution in an insect. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 268:1589-1593.
6. Davidowitz, G., and H. F. Nijhout 2004. The physiological basis of reaction norms: the interaction among growth rate, the duration of growth and body size. Int. Comp. Biol. 44:443-449.
7. Davidowitz, G., L. J. D'Amico, and H. F. Nijhout 2003. Critical weight in the development of insect body size. Evol. Dev. 5:188-197.
8. Davidowitz, G., L. J. D'Amico, and H. F. Nijhout 2004. The effects of environmental variation on a mechanism that controls insect body size. Evol. Ecol. Res. 6(1):49-62.
9. Davidowitz, G., D. A. Roff, and H. F. Nijhout 2005. A physiological perspective on the response of body size and development time to simultaneous directional selection. Int. Comp. Biol. 45:525-531.
10. Denver, R. L. 1996. Neuroendocrine control of amphibian metamorphosis. Pp. 433-464 in L. I. Gilbert, J. R. Tata, and B. G. Atkinson, eds. Metamorphosis: postembryonic reprogramming of gene expression in amphibian and insect cells. Academic Press, San Diego, CA
11. Dickerson, G. E. 1955. Genetic slippage in response to selection for multiple objectives. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 20:213-223.
12. Donnan, L., and P. C. L. John 1983. Cell-cycle control by timer and sizer in chlamydomonas. Nature 304:630-633.
13. Frankino, W. A., B. J. Zwaan, D. L. Stern, and P. M. Brakefield 2005. Natural selection and developmental constraints in the evolution of allometries. Science 307:718-720.
14. Kingsolver, J. G., and R. B. Huey 2008. Size, temperature, and fitness: three rules. Evol. Ecol. Res. 10:251-268.
15. Kingsolver, J. G., and D. W. Pfennig 2004. Individual-level selection as a cause of Cope's rule phyletic size increase. Evolution 58:1608-1612.
16. Kirkpatrick, M., and Lofsvold, D. 1992. Measuring selection and constraint in the evolution of growth. Evolution 46:954-971.
17. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
18. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA
19. Mirth, C. K., and L. M. Riddiford 2007. Size assessment and growth control: how adult size is determined in insects. Bioessays 29:344-355.
20. Mirth, C., J. W. Truman, and L. M. Riddiford 2005. The role of the prothoracic gland in determining critical weight to metamorphosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 15:1796-1807.
21. Nijhout, H. F. 1994. Insect Hormones. Princeton Univ. Press. Princeton, NJ
22. Nijhout, H. F., and C. M. Williams (1974). Control of molting and metamorphosis in tobacco hornworm, Manduca-Sexta (L)-growth of last-instar larva and decision to pupate. J. Exp. Biol. 61: 481-491.
23. Nijhout, H. F., G. Davidowitz, and D. A. Roff 2006. A quantitative analysis of the mechanism that controls body size in Manduca sexta. J. Biol. 5:16.11-16.15.
24. Nijhout H. F., D.A. Roff, and G. Davidowitz 2010. Conflicting processes in the evolution of body size and development time. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 365:567-575.
25. Nilsson, O., and J. Baron 2004. Fundamental limits on longitudinal bone growth: growth plate senescence and epiphyseal fusion. TEM 15:370-374.
26. Nilsson, O., and J. Baron 2005. Impact of growth plate senescence on catch-up growth and epiphyseal fusion. Ped. Neph. 20:319-322.
27. Nordskog, A. W. 1977. Success and failure of quantitative genetic theory in poultry. Pp. 569-585 in E. E. Pollack, O. Kempthorne, and T. B. Bailey, eds. Proceedings of the international conference on quantitative genetics. Iowa state Univ. Press, Ames, IA
28. Raguso, R. A., and M. A. Willis 2005. Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by wild hawkmoths, Manduca sexta. Anim. Behav. 69:407-418.
29. Robertson, F. W., and E. Reeve 1952. Studies in quantitative inheritance.1. The effects of selection of wing and thorax length in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Genet. 50:414-448.
30. Roff, D. A. 1997. Evolutionary quantitative genetics. Chapman and Hall, New York
31. Roff, D. A. 2010. Modeling evolution: an introduction to numerical methods. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K
32. Roff, D. A., and D. J. Fairbairn 2007. The evolution of tradeoffs: where are we? J. Evol. Biol. 20:433-447.
33. Roff, D. A., and R. Preziosi 1994. The Estimation of the genetic correlation-the use of the jackknife. Heredity 73:544-548.
34. Roff, D. A., J. M. Prokkola, I. Krams, and M. J. Rantala 2012. There's more than one way to skin a G matrix. J. Evol Biol.: In press
35. Rutledge, J. J., E. J. Eisen, and J. E. Legates 1973. An experimental evaluation of genetic correlation. Genetics 75:709-726.
36. Shingleton, A. W., W. A. Frankino, T. Flatt, H. F. Nijhout, and D. J. Emlen 2007. Size and shape: the developmental regulation of static allometry in insects. Bioessays 29:536-548.
37. Stillwell, R. C., and G. Davidowitz 2010. A developmental perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism of a moth. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 277:2069-2074.
38. Ungerer, M.C., S. S. Halldorsdottir, J. L. Modliszewski, T. F. C. Mackay, and M. D. Purugganan 2002. Quantitative trait loci for inflorescence development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 160:1133-1151.
39. Zera, A. J., and L. G. Harshman 2001. The physiology of life history trade-offs in animals. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32:95-126.
40. Zijlstra, W. G., M. J. Steigenga, P. M. Brakefield, and B. J. Zwaan 2003. Simultaneous selection on two fitness-related traits in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Evolution 57:1852-1862.