Biliary ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiogram. Comparison of their diagnostic performance in recurrent choledocholithiasis;Ultrasonido biliar o colangiorresonancia. Comparación de su rendimiento diagnostic en coledocolitiasis recurrente

Revista de Gastroenterologia de Mexico

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 329-333

  Chavez Valencia V ^a   Espinosa Ortega, H F ^a   Espinoza Peralta, D ^a   Arce Salinas, C A ^b  

^a Residentes de Medicina Interna   (Mexico)

^b PEMEX   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Biliary tract; Cholangiography; Choledocholithiasis; Diagnosis; Gallstones; Mexico

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLESTASIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY;

CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLESTASIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84865745947     PISSN: 03750906     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Rösch T, Meining A, Frühmorgen S, et al. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT and EUS in biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:870-6. (Pubitemid 41127905)
2. Rubens DJ. Hepatobiliary imaging and its pitfalls. Radiol Clin North Am 2004;42:257-78. (Pubitemid 38596966)
3. Valls C. Coledocolitiasis: diagnóstico por la imagen. Cir Esp 2002;71:267-8.
4. Cooper ST, Slivka A. Incidence, risk factors, and prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2007;36:259-76. (Pubitemid 46803189)
5. Hoyuela C, Cugat E, Marco C. Opciones actuales para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la coledocolitiasis. Cir Esp 2000;68:243-53.
6. Pavone P, Laghi A, Lomanto D, et al. MR cholangiography (MRC) in the evaluation of CBD stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1997;11:982-5. (Pubitemid 127524211)
7. Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen O, et al. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocolithiasis: retrospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 1999;44:118-22. (Pubitemid 29143291)
8. Castellón CJ, Fernández M, Del Amo E. Coledocolitiasis: indicaciones de colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica y colangiorresonancia magnética. Cir Esp 2002;71:314-8.
9. Musella M, Barbalace G, Capparelli G, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of common bile duct. Br J Surg 1998;85:16-9. (Pubitemid 28034102)
10. Contractor QQ, Boujemla M, Contractor TG, El-Essawy OM. Abnormal common bile duct sonography. The best predictor of choledocolithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Clin Gastroenterol 1997;25:429-32. (Pubitemid 27528124)
11. Prat F, Amouyal G, Amouyal P, et al. Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct lithiasis. Lancet 1996;347:75-79. (Pubitemid 26017851)
12. Eshghi F, Abdi R. Routine magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to intra-operative cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2008;7:525-8.
13. Fagan TJ. Nomogram for Bayes theorem. N Engl J Med 1975;293:257.