Relationship between perceived and measured changes in walking after stroke

Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 115-121

  Tang, Ada ^a   Eng, Janice J ^a   Rand, Debbie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

outcome assessment (health care); stroke; walking

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMAN; KINESIOTHERAPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); PHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SELF REPORT; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING;

AGED; EXERCISE TEST; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMANS; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SELF REPORT; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING;

EID: 84865739419     PISSN: 15570576     EISSN: 15570584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e318262dbd0     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bohannon RW, Andrews AW, Smith MB. Rehabilitation goals of patients with hemiplegia. Int J Rehabil Res. 1988;11:181-183. (Pubitemid 19057124)
2. Harris JE, Eng JJ. Goal priorities identified by individuals with chronic stroke: Implications for rehabilitation professionals. Physiother Can. 2004;56:171-176.
3. States RA, Pappas E, Salem Y. Overground physical therapy gait training for chronic stroke patients with mobility deficits. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3(3):CD006075.
4. Eng JJ, Tang PF. Gait training strategies to optimize walking ability in people with stroke: a synthesis of the evidence. Expert Rev Neurother. 2007;7(10):1417-1436. (Pubitemid 350012728)
5. Eng JJ, Chu KS, Kim CM, Dawson AS, Carswell A, Hepburn KE. A community-based group exercise program for persons with chronic stroke. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1271-1278. (Pubitemid 36936143)
6. Duncan PW, Sullivan KJ, Behrman AL, et al. Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(21):2026-2036.
7. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN, Wright JG. A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(12):1204-1217. (Pubitemid 34002973)
8. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10(4):407-415. (Pubitemid 20025670)
9. Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-170.
10. Redelmeier DA, Guyatt GH, Goldstein RS. Assessing the minimal important difference in symptoms: a comparison of two techniques. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(11):1215-1219. (Pubitemid 26386225)
11. Ozyurekoglu T, McCabe SJ, Goldsmith LJ, LaJoie AS. The minimal clinically important difference of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scale. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31(5):733-738.
12. Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL, Guyatt GH. Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: Part 1. Phys Ther. 1998;78(11):1186-1196. (Pubitemid 28507242)
13. Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(5):743-749. (Pubitemid 44030194)
14. Fulk GD, Ludwig M, Dunning K, Golden S, Boyne P, West T. Estimating clinically important change in gait speed in people with stroke undergoing outpatient rehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011;35(2): 82-89.
15. Emery CF, Blumenthal JA. Perceived change among participants in an exercise program for older adults. Gerontologist. 1990;30(4): 516-521. (Pubitemid 20303205)
16. Burridge JH, Elessi K, Pickering RM, Taylor PN. Walking on an uneven surface: The effect of common peroneal stimulation on gait parameters and relationship between perceived and measured benefits in a sample of participants with drop-foot. Neuromodulation. 2007;10(1): 59-67. (Pubitemid 46089365)
17. Pepin V, Laviolette L, Brouillard C, et al. Significance of changes in endurance shuttle walking performance. Thorax. 2011;66(2): 115-120.
18. Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(2):75-82. (Pubitemid 40439461)
19. American Thoracic Society. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):111-117.
20. Fulk GD, Echternach JL. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of gait speed in individuals undergoing rehabilitation after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2008;32(1):8-13.
21. Eng JJ, Dawson AS, Chu KS. Submaximal exercise in persons with stroke: test-retest reliability and concurrent validity with maximal oxygen consumption. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(1):113-118. (Pubitemid 38049601)
22. Kosak M, Smith T. Comparison of the 2-, 6-, and 12-minute walk tests in patients with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(1):103-108. (Pubitemid 40464162)
23. Schmid A, Duncan PW, Studenski S, et al. Improvements in speed-based gait classifications are meaningful. Stroke. 2007;38(7):2096-2100. (Pubitemid 47012274)
24. Robinett CS, Vondran MA. Functional ambulation velocity and distance requirements in rural and urban communities.Aclinical report. Phys Ther. 1988;68(9):1371-1373. (Pubitemid 19064007)
25. Beninato M, Gill-Body KM, Salles S, Stark PC, Black-Schaffer RM, Stein J. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(1):32-39. (Pubitemid 43053301)
26. Tilson JK, Sullivan KJ, Cen SY, et al. Meaningful gait speed improvement during the first 60 days poststroke: minimal clinically important difference. Phys Ther. 2010;90(2):196-208.
27. Lewek MD, Randall EP. Reliability of spatiotemporal asymmetry during overground walking for individuals following chronic stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011;35(3):116-121.
28. Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(5):395-407. (Pubitemid 36694091)
29. Norman GR, Stratford P, Regehr G.Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(8):869-879. (Pubitemid 27423516)