Comparison of two noninvasive devices for measurement of central systolic blood pressure with invasive measurement during cardiac catheterization

Journal of Clinical Hypertension

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 575-579

  Ott, Christian ^a   Haetinger, Siegberto ^b   Schneider, Markus P ^a   Pauschinger, Matthias ^b   Schmieder, Roland E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b Academic Hospital of Nuremberg   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CARDIOVASCULAR EQUIPMENT; CENTRAL SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INVASIVE CENTRAL SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT DEVICE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NONINVASIVE CENTRAL SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT DEVICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIAL ARTERY; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; WAVEFORM;

BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 84865736813     PISSN: 15246175     EISSN: 17517176     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00682.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Safar ME. Epidemiological findings imply that goals for drug treatment of hypertension need to be revised. Circulation. 2001;103:1188-1190.
2. Kannel WB, Gordon T, Schwartz MJ. Systolic versus diastolic blood pressure and risk of coronary heart disease. The Framingham study. Am J Cardiol. 1971;27:335-346.
3. Franklin SS, Larson MG, Khan SA, et al. Does the relation of blood pressure to coronary heart disease risk change with aging? The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2001;103:1245-1249.
4. Franklin SS, Jacobs MJ, Wong ND, et al. Predominance of isolated systolic hypertension among middle-aged and elderly US hypertensives: analysis based on National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III. Hypertension. 2001;37:869-874.
5. Karamanoglu M, O'Rourke MF, Avolio AP, Kelly RP. An analysis of the relationship between central aortic and peripheral upper limb pressure waves in man. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:160-167.
6. Pauca AL, O'Rourke MF, Kon ND. Prospective evaluation of a method for estimating ascending aortic pressure from the radial artery pressure waveform. Hypertension. 2001;38:932-937.
7. Takazawa K, O'Rourke MF, Fujita M, et al. Estimation of ascending aortic pressure from radial arterial pressure using a generalised transfer function. Z Kardiol. 1996;85(suppl 3):137-139.
8. Segers P, Qasem A, De Backer T, et al. Peripheral "oscillatory" compliance is associated with aortic augmentation index. Hypertension. 2001;37:1434-1439.
9. Williams B, Lacy PS, Thom SM, et al. Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study. Circulation. 2006;113:1213-1225.
10. Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, et al. Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the Strong Heart study. Hypertension. 2007;50:197-203.
11. Huang CM, Wang KL, Cheng HM, et al. Central versus ambulatory blood pressure in the prediction of all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities. J Hypertens. 2011;29:454-459.
12. London GM, Asmar RG, O'Rourke MF, Safar ME. Mechanism(s) of selective systolic blood pressure reduction after a low-dose combination of perindopril/indapamide in hypertensive subjects: comparison with atenolol. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:92-99.
13. Williams B, Lacy PS, Yan P, et al. Development and validation of a novel method to derive central aortic systolic pressure from the radial pressure waveform using an n-point moving average method. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:951-961.
14. Wilkinson IB, Fuchs SA, Jansen IM, et al. Reproducibility of pulse wave velocity and augmentation index measured by pulse wave analysis. J Hypertens. 1998;16:2079-2084.
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
16. White WB, Berson AS, Robbins C, et al. National standard for measurement of resting and ambulatory blood pressures with automated sphygmomanometers. Hypertension. 1993;21:504-509.
17. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler W, et al. An outline of the revised British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens. 1993;11:677-679.
18. O'Brien E, Pickering T, Asmar R, et al. Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit. 2002;7:3-17.
19. Smulyan H, Siddiqui DS, Carlson RJ, et al. Clinical utility of aortic pulses and pressures calculated from applanated radial-artery pulses. Hypertension. 2003;42:150-155.
20. Zuo JL, Li Y, Yan ZJ, et al. Validation of the central blood pressure estimation by the SphygmoCor System in Chinese. Blood Press Monit. 2010;15:268-274.
21. O'Rourke MF. Estimation of central aortic pressure by SphygmoCor requires accurate peripheral pressure measurement. Clin Sci (Lond). 2004;106:434-435; author reply 436-437.
22. Jatoi NA, Mahmud A, Bennett K, Feely J. Assessment of arterial stiffness in hypertension: comparison of oscillometric (Arteriograph), piezoelectronic (Complior) and tonometric (SphygmoCor) techniques. J Hypertens. 2009;27:2186-2191.
23. Sharman JE, Lim R, Qasem AM, et al. Validation of a generalized transfer function to noninvasively derive central blood pressure during exercise. Hypertension. 2006;47:1203-1208.
24. Garcia-Ortiz L, Recio-Rodriguez JI, Canales-Reina JJ, et al. Comparison of two measuring instruments, BPro and SphygmoCor system as reference, to evaluate central systolic blood pressure and radial augmentation index. Hypertens Res. 2012;35 (6):617-623.
25. Schillaci G, Pucci G. Central and 24-h blood pressure: dwarfs standing upon the shoulders of giants? J Hypertens. 2011;29:430-433.