Higgs production as a probe of anomalous top couplings

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2012, Issue 8, 2012, Pages

  Choudhury, Debajyoti ^a   Saha, Pratishruti ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELHI   (India)

Author keywords

Hadronic colliders; QCD phenomenology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865726690     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2012)144     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. LEP Working Group for Higgs boson searches, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL collaborations, R. Barate et al., Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 565 (2003) 61 [hep-ex/0306033] [inSPIRE].
2. -1 of pp collision data at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 49 [arXiv:1202.1408] [inSPIRE].
3. CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Combined results of searches for the Standard Model Higgs boson in pp collisions at √s = 7TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 26 [arXiv:1202.1488] [inSPIRE].
4. -1 of data, arXiv:1107.5518 [inSPIRE].
5. L.J. Hall, D. Pinner and J.T. Ruderman, A natural SUSY Higgs near 126 GeV, JHEP 04 (2012) 131 [arXiv:1112.2703] [inSPIRE].
6. S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal and G. Weiglein, Interpreting the LHC Higgs search results in the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 201 [arXiv: 1112.3026] [INSPIRE].
7. A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, A. Djouadi, F. Mahmoudi and J. Quevillon, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs for super symmetric models, Phys. Lett. B 708 (2012) 162 [arXiv: 1112. 3028] [INSPIRE].
8. M. Carena, S. Gori, N.R. Shah and CE. Wagner, A 125 GeV SM-like Higgs in the MSSM and the γγ rate, JHEP 03 (2012) 014 [arXiv: 1112. 3336] [INSPIRE].
9. U. Ellwanger, A Higgs boson near 125 GeV with enhanced di-photon signal in the NMSSM, JHEP 03 (2012) 044 [arXiv: 1112.3548] [INSPIRE].
10. M. Kadastik, K. Kannike, A. Racioppi and M. Raidal, Implications of the 125 GeV Higgs boson for scalar dark matter and for the CMSSM phenomenology, JHEP 05 (2012) 061 [arXiv: 1112. 3647] [INSPIRE].
11. J. Cao, Z. Heng, D. Li and J.M. Yang, Current experimental constraints on the lightest Higgs boson mass in the constrained MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 665 [arXiv: 1112.4391] [INSPIRE].
12. 1 at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2012) 172 [arXiv: 1112.5180] [INSPIRE].
13. J.F. Gunion, Y. Jiang and S. Kraml, The constrained NMSSM and Higgs near 125 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 454 [arXiv: 1201.0982] [INSPIRE].
14. P. Fileviez Perez, SUSY spectrum and the Higgs mass in the BLMSSM, Phys. Lett. B 711 (2012) 353 [arXiv: 1201.1501] [INSPIRE].
15. S. King, M. Muhlleitner and R. Nevzorov, NMSSM Higgs benchmarks near 125 GeV, Nucl. Phys. B 860 (2012) 207 [arXiv: 1201.2671] [INSPIRE].
16. D. Albornoz Vasquez, G. Bélanger, R. Godbole and A. Pukhov, The Higgs boson in the MSSM in light of the LHC, arXiv: 1112.2200 [INSPIRE].
17. - and dark matter direct detection, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1906 [arXiv: 1112.3032] [INSPIRE].
18. C. Cheung and Y. Nomura, Higgs descendants, arXiv: 1112.3043 [INSPIRE].
19. N. Karagiannakis, G. Lazarides and C. Pallis, Dark matter and Higgs mass in the CMSSM with Yukawa quasi-unification, arXiv: 1201. 2111 [INSPIRE].
20. G. Guo, B. Ren and X.-G. He, LHC evidence of a 126 GeV Higgs boson from H → γγ with three and four generations, arXiv: 1112.3188 [INSPIRE].
21. G. Burdman, CE. Haluch and R.D. Matheus, Is the LHC observing the pseudo-scalar state of a two-Higgs doublet model?, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 095016 [arXiv: 1112. 3961] [INSPIRE].
22. K. Cheung and T.-C. Yuan, Could the excess seen at 124-126 GeV be due to the Randall-Sundrum radion?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 141602 [arXiv: 1112.4146] [INSPIRE].
23. F. Goertz, U. Haisch and M. Neubert, Bounds on warped extra dimensions from a Standard Model-like Higgs boson, Phys. Lett. B 713 (2012) 23 [arXiv: 1112.5099] [INSPIRE].
24. X.-G. He, B. Ren and J. Tandean, Hints of Standard Model Higgs boson at the LHC and light dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 093019 [arXiv: 1112. 6364] [INSPIRE].
25. LEP Electroweak Working Group webpage, http://lepewwg.web.cern.ch/ LEPEWWG.
26. R.S. Chivukula, M. Narain and J. Womersley, Dynamical electroweak symmetry breaking, in Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 33 (2006) 1258 [inSPIRE].
27. Particle Data Group collaboration, C. Amsler et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Lett. B 667 (2008) 1 [inSPIRE].
28. G. Bhattacharyya, A pedagogical review of electroweak symmetry breaking scenarios, Rept. Prog. Phys. 74 (2011) 026201 [arXiv:0910.5095] [inSPIRE].
29. G. Isidori, Effective theories of electroweak symmetry breaking, PoS(CD09)073 [arXiv:0911.3219] [inSPIRE].
30. C.T. Hill, Topcolor: top quark condensation in a gauge extension of the Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B 266 (1991) 419 [inSPIRE].
31. C.T. Hill, Topcolor assisted technicolor, Phys. Lett. B 345 (1995) 483 [hep-ph/9411426] [inSPIRE].
32. N. Arkani-Hamed, A.G. Cohen and H. Georgi, Electroweak symmetry breaking from dimensional deconstruction, Phys. Lett. B 513 (2001) 232 [hep-ph/0105239] [inSPIRE].
33. M. Schmaltz and D. Tucker-Smith, Little Higgs review, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55 (2005) 229 [hep-ph/0502182] [inSPIRE].
34. M. Perelstein, Little Higgs models and their phenomenology, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 58 (2007) 247 [hep-ph/0512128] [inSPIRE].
35. T. Appelquist, H.-C. Cheng and B.A. Dobrescu, Bounds on universal extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 035002 [hep-ph/0012100] [inSPIRE].
36. I. Antoniadis, A possible new dimension at a few TeV, Phys. Lett. B 246 (1990) 377 [inSPIRE].
37. N. Arkani-Hamed and M. Schmaltz, Hierarchies without symmetries from extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 033005 [hep-ph/9903417] [inSPIRE].
38. R. Barbieri, L.J. Hall and Y. Nomura, A constrained Standard Model from a compact extra dimension, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 105007 [hep-ph/0011311] [inSPIRE].
39. G. Cacciapaglia, M. Cirelli and G. Cristadoro, Muon anomalous magnetic moment in a calculable model with one extra dimension, Nucl. Phys. B 634 (2002) 230 [hep-ph/0111288] [inSPIRE].
40. 6 models, Phys. Rept. 183 (1989) 193 [inSPIRE].
41. G. Bhattacharyya, D. Choudhury and K. Sridhar, New LEP bounds on B violating scalar couplings: R-parity violating supersymmetry or diquarks, Phys. Lett. B 355 (1995) 193 [hep-ph/9504314] [inSPIRE].
42. T. Han, I. Lewis and Z. Liu, Colored resonant signals at the LHC: largest rate and simplest topology, JHEP 12 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1010.4309] [inSPIRE].
43. J. Aguilar-Saavedra, A minimal set of top anomalous couplings, Nucl. Phys. B 812 (2009) 181 [arXiv:0811.3842] [inSPIRE].
44. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [inSPIRE].
45. C. Arzt, M. Einhorn and J. Wudka, Patterns of deviation from the Standard Model, Nucl. Phys. B 433 (1995) 41 [hep-ph/9405214] [inSPIRE].
46. D. Atwood, A. Aeppli and A. Soni, Extracting anomalous gluon-top effective couplings at the supercolliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 2754 [inSPIRE].
47. T.G. Rizzo, Signals for top quark anomalous chromomagnetic moments at colliders, hep-ph/9407366 [inSPIRE].
48. D. Atwood, A. Kagan and T. Rizzo, Constraining anomalous top quark couplings at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 6264 [hep-ph/9407408] [inSPIRE].
49. P. Haberl, O. Nachtmann and A. Wilch, Top production in hadron hadron collisions and anomalous top-gluon couplings, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 4875 [hep-ph/9505409] [inSPIRE].
50. K.-M. Cheung, Probing the chromoelectric and chromomagnetic dipole moments of the top quark at hadronic colliders, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 3604 [hep-ph/9511260] [inSPIRE].
51. T.G. Rizzo, Constraints on anomalous top quark couplings at the LHC, in the Proceedings of 1996 DPF/DPB Summer Study on New Directions for High-Energy Physics (Snowmass 96), Snowmass Colorado U.S.A. June 25-July 12 1996, pg. NEW170 [eConf C 960625 (1996) NEW170] [hep-ph/9609311] [inSPIRE].
52. S. Choi, C. Kim and J. Lee, T odd gluon-top quark effective couplings at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Lett. B 415 (1997) 67 [hep-ph/9706379] [inSPIRE].
53. B. Grzadkowski, B. Lampe and K. Abraham, CP violation, top quarks and the Tevatron upgrade, Phys. Lett. B 415 (1997) 193 [hep-ph/9706489] [inSPIRE].
54. B. Lampe, New interactions in top quark production and decay at the Tevatron upgrade, Phys. Lett. B 415 (1997) 63 [hep-ph/9709493] [inSPIRE].
55. H.-Y. Zhou, CP violation in top quark pair production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 114002 [hep-ph/9805358] [inSPIRE].
56. K.-I. Hikasa, K. Whisnant, J.M. Yang and B.-L. Young, Probing anomalous top quark interactions at the Fermilab Tevatron collider, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 114003 [hep-ph/9806401] [inSPIRE].
57. K. Ohkuma, CP violation via top quark anomalous interaction at the Fermilab Tevatron, hep-ph/0105117 [inSPIRE].
58. J. Sjolin, LHC experimental sensitivity to CP-violating gttcouplings, J. Phys. G 29 (2003) 543 [inSPIRE].
59. D. Atwood, S. Bar-Shalom, G. Eilam and A. Soni, CP violation in top physics, Phys. Rept. 347 (2001) 1 [hep-ph/0006032] [inSPIRE].
60. Z. Dong, G. Durieux, J.-M. Gerard, T. Han and F. Maltoni, Baryon number violation at the LHC: the top option, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 016006 [arXiv:1107.3805] [inSPIRE].
61. O. Antipin and G. Valencia, T-odd correlations from CP-violating anomalous top-quark couplings revisited, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 013013 [arXiv:0807.1295] [inSPIRE].
62. S.K. Gupta, A.S. Mete and G. Valencia, CP violating anomalous top-quark couplings at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 034013 [arXiv:0905.1074] [inSPIRE].
63. D. Choudhury and P. Saha, Probing top anomalous couplings at the Tevatron and the Large Hadron Collider, Pramana 77 (2011) 1079 [arXiv:0911.5016] [inSPIRE].
64. P. Saha, Probing anomalous top-gluon couplings at colliders, arXiv: 1010.1931 [INSPIRE].
65. - → tt̄ and chromoelectric and chromomagnetic dipole couplings of the top quark, Eur. Phys. J. C 11 (1999) 485 [hep-ph/9904319] [INSPIRE].
66. - → tt̄, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 2405 [INSPIRE].
67. S. Choi and K. Hagiwara, Probing the top quark electric dipole moment at a photon linear collider, Phys. Lett. B 359 (1995) 369 [hep-ph/9506430] [INSPIRE].
68. T.G. Rizzo, Probing anomalous chromomagnetic top quark couplings at the NLC, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 4478 [hep-ph/9405391] [INSPIRE].
69. T.G. Rizzo, Anomalous chromoelectric and chromomagnetic moments of the top quark at the NLC, hep-ph/9605361 [INSPIRE].
70. R. Martinez and J.A. Rodriguez, Using the radiative decay b → sγ to bound the chromomagnetic dipole moment of the top quark, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 3212 [hep-ph/9612438] [INSPIRE].
71. b, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 077504 [hep-ph/9707453] [INSPIRE].
72. P. Hasenfratz and J. Nager, The cutoff dependence of the Higgs meson mass and the onset of new physics in the Standard Model, Z. Phys. C 37 (1988) 477 [INSPIRE].
73. S. Choudhury and Mamta, Variational approach to Higgs mass bound, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12 (1997) 1847 [INSPIRE].
74. U. Baur, A. Juste, L. Orr and D. Rainwater, Probing electroweak top quark couplings at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 054013 [hep-ph/0412021] [INSPIRE].
75. R. Martinez and J.A. Rodriguez, The anomalous chromomagnetic dipole moment of the top quark in the Standard Model and beyond, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 057301 [hep-ph/0109109] [INSPIRE].
76. R. Martinez, M. Perez and N. Poveda, Chromomagnetic dipole moment of the top quark revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C 53 (2008) 221 [hep-ph/0701098] [INSPIRE].
77. L. Ding and C.-X. Yue, Top quark chromomagnetic dipole moment in the littlest Higgs model with T-parity, Commun. Theor. Phys. 50 (2008) 441 [arXiv: 0801.1880] [INSPIRE].
78. Q.-H. Cao, C.-R. Chen, F. Larios and C.-P. Yuan, Anomalous gtt couplings in the littlest Higgs model with T-parity, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 015004 [arXiv: 0801.2998] [INSPIRE].
79. S. Dawson, Radiative corrections to Higgs boson production, Nucl. Phys. B 359 (1991) 283 [INSPIRE].
80. A. Djouadi, M. Spira and P. Zerwas, Production of Higgs bosons in proton colliders: QCD corrections, Phys. Lett. B 264 (1991) 440 [INSPIRE].
81. R.V. Harlander and W.B. Kilgore, Next-to-next-to-leading order Higgs production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 201801 [hep-ph/0201206] [INSPIRE].
82. C. Anastasiou and K. Melnikov, Higgs boson production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 646 (2002) 220 [hep-ph/0207004] [INSPIRE].
83. V. Ravindran, J. Smith and W.L. van Neerven, NNLO corrections to the total cross-section for Higgs boson production in hadron hadron collisions, Nucl. Phys. B 665 (2003) 325 [hep-ph/0302135] [inSPIRE].
84. D. Graudenz, M. Spira and P. Zerwas, QCD corrections to Higgs boson production at proton proton colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 1372 [inSPIRE].
85. M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz and P. Zerwas, Higgs boson production at the LHC, Nucl. Phys. B 453 (1995) 17 [hep-ph/9504378] [inSPIRE].
86. J. Baglio and A. Djouadi, Predictions for Higgs production at the Tevatron and the associated uncertainties, JHEP 10 (2010) 064 [arXiv:1003.4266] [inSPIRE].
87. LHC Higgs Cross section Working Group collaboration, S. Dittmaier et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 1. Inclusive observables, arXiv:1101.0593 [inSPIRE].