Satisfaction with joint replacement in public versus private hospitals: A cohort study

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 82, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 616-624

  Adie, Sam ^a,b   Dao, Alan ^b   Harris, Ian A ^a,b   Naylor, Justine M ^a,b   Mittal, Rajat ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b LIVERPOOL HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Knee; Personal satisfaction

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIVATE HOSPITAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; SELF REPORT; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HOSPITALS, PRIVATE; HOSPITALS, PUBLIC; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEW SOUTH WALES; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SELF REPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84865726075     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: 14452197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06113.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Naylor JM, Harmer AR, Heard RC, Harris IA. Patterns of recovery following knee and hip replacement in an Australian cohort. Aust. Health Rev. 2009; 33: 124-35.
2. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide:AOA; 2010.
3. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2007; 89: 780-5.
4. Culliford DJ, Maskell J, Beard DJ, Murray DW, Price AJ, Arden NK. Temporal trends in hip and knee replacement in the United Kingdom: 1991 to 2006. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2010; 92: 130-5.
5. Katz JN, Mahomed NN, Baron JA etal. Association of hospital and surgeon procedure volume with patient-centered outcomes of total knee replacement in a population-based cohort of patients age 65 years and older. Arthritis Rheum. 2007; 56: 568-74.
6. Marlow NE, Barraclough B, Collier NA etal. Centralization and the relationship between volume and outcome in knee arthroplasty procedures. ANZ J. Surg. 2010; 80: 234-41.
7. Bozic KJ, Maselli J, Pekow PS, Lindenauer PK, Vail TP, Auerbach AD. The influence of procedure volumes and standardization of care on quality and efficiency in total joint replacement surgery. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2010; 92: 2643-52.
8. Wei M-H, Lin Y-L, Shi, H-Y, Chiu H-C. Effects of provider patient volume and comorbidity on clinical and economic outcomes for total knee arthroplasty: a population-based study. J. Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 906-12.
9. Kreder, HJ, Grosso, P, Williams, JI, Jaglal, S, Axcell, T, Wal, EK, and Stephen, DJG. Provider volume and other predictors of outcome after total knee arthroplasty: a population study in Ontario. Can. J. Surg. 2003; 46: 15-22.
10. Losina E, Walensky RP, Kessler CL etal. Cost-effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: patient risk and hospital volume. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009; 169: 1113-21; discussion 1121-2.
11. Thompson R, Kane RL, Gromala T etal. Complications and short-term outcomes associated with total hip arthroplasty in teaching and community hospitals. J. Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 32-40.
12. Hollowell J, Grocott MPW, Hardy R, Haddad FS, Mythen MG, Raine R. Major elective joint replacement surgery: socioeconomic variations in surgical risk, postoperative morbidity and length of stay. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2010; 16: 529-38.
13. Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Wickiewicz TL etal. Patients' expectations of knee surgery. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2001; 83-A: 1005-12.
14. Bachmeier CJM, March LM, Cross MJ etal. A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2001; 9: 137-46.
15. Fortin PR, Penrod JR, Clarke AE etal. Timing of total joint replacement affects clinical outcomes among patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Arthritis Rheum. 2002; 46: 3327-30.
16. Bannister G, Ahmed M, Bannister M, Bray R, Dillon P, Eastaugh-Waring S. Early complications of total hip and knee replacement: a comparison of outcomes in a regional orthopaedic hospital and two independent treatment centres. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2010; 92: 610-4.
17. Katz JN, Barrett J, Mahomed NN, Baron JA, Wright RJ, Losina E. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and the outcomes of total knee replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2004; 86-A: 1909-16.
18. Heck DA, Robinson RL, Partridge CM, Lubitz RM, Freund DA. Patient outcomes after knee replacement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1998; 356: 93-110.
19. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KDJ. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010; 468: 57-63.
20. Kwon SK, Kang YG, Kim SJ, Chang CB, Seong SC, Kim TK. Correlations between commonly used clinical outcome scales and patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 1125-30.
21. Narayan K, Thomas G, Kumar R. Is extreme flexion of the knee after total knee replacement a prerequisite for patient satisfaction? Int. Orthop. 2009; 33: 671-4.
22. Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, Malefijt MC, Laan RF, Veth RP. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J. Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 740-7.
23. Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF etal. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J. Rheumatol. 2002; 29: 1273-9.
24. Vissers MM, de Groot IB, Reijman M, Bussmann JB, Stam HJ, Verhaar JA. Functional capacity and actual daily activity do not contribute to patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2010; 11: 121.
25. March LM, Cross MJ, Lapsley H etal. Outcomes after hip or knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis. A prospective cohort study com paring patients' quality of life before and after surgery with age-related population norms. Med. J. Aust. 1999; 171: 235-8.
26. Lastad Lygre SH, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Vollset SE. Pain and function in patients after primary unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2010; 92: 2890-7.
27. Roberts VI, Esler CNA, Harper WM. A 15-year follow-up study of 4606 primary total knee replacements. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2007; 89: 1452-6.