Integration of Web accessibility into agile methods

ICEIS 2012 - Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

Volumn 3 HCI, Issue EA/-, 2012, Pages 123-127

  Luján Mora, Sergio ^a   Masri, Firas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Agile; Evaluation; Testing; Web

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES; AGILE; AGILE METHODS; AGILE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; DISABLED PEOPLE; EVALUATION; PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES; SHORT PERIODS; WEB; WEB ACCESSIBILITY; WEB APPLICATION; WEB DEVELOPERS; WEB PROJECTS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; STANDARDS; TESTING; WEBSITES;

HANDICAPPED PERSONS;

EID: 84865721889     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., et al., 2001. Manifiesto for Agile Software Development. Internet: http://agilemanifesto.org/ (visited 20/12/2011)
2. th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2009), Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 24, p. 807-818, Milan (Italy), May 6-10.
3. Brajnik, G., 2008. Beyond Conformance: The Role of Accessibility Evaluation Methods. In WISE'08, Proceedings of the 2008 International Workshops on Web Information Systems Engineering, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5175, p. 63-80, Auckland (New Zealand), September 1-3.
4. Edwards, P., 2010. Accessibility Testing in an Agile Process. Internet: http://pauledwards.posterous.com/accessibility-testing-in-an-agile-process (visited 18/12/2011)
5. Faulkner, L., 2003. Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. In Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35 (3), p. 379-383.
6. Fenton, N. E., and Pfleeger, S. L., 1998. Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach. Boston, USA: PWS Publishing Co.
7. Groves, K., 2011a. Agile & Accessibility. Internet: http://www.karlgroves.com/2011/09/28/agile-accessibility/ (visited 10/01/2012)
8. Groves, K., 2011b. It's time to let go of the waterfall model of accessibility. Internet: http://www.karlgroves.com/2011/10/03/it-is-time-to-let- go-of-the-waterfall-model-of-accessibility/ (visited 10/01/2012)
9. Koch, A. S., 2005. Agile Software Development: Evaluating the Methods for Your Organization. Norwood, USA: Artech House.
10. Nielsen, J., 2000. Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users. Internet: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html (visited 10/09/2011)
11. Masri, F., and Luján-Mora, S., 2011. A Combined Agile Methodology for the Evaluation of Web Accessibility. In IHCI 2011, IADIS International Conference Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction 2011, p. 423-428, Rome (Italy), July 24-26.
12. Nielsen, J., 1996. Accessible Design for Users With Disabilities. Internet: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9610.html (visited 08/01/2012)
13. Nielsen, J., 2000. Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users. Internet: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html (visited 08/01/2012)
14. Royce, W., 1970. Managing the Development of Large Software Systems. In Proceedings of IEEE WESCON, p. 1-9, August 26.
15. Vigo, M., Arrue, M., Brajnik, G., Lomuscio, R., and Abascal, J., 2007. Quantitative metrics for measuring web accessibility. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, p. 99-107, Banff (Canada), May 7-8.
16. World Health Organization (WHO), 2011. World Report on Disability 2011. Internet: http://www.who.int/disabilities/world-report/2011/en/index.html (visited 10/12/2011)
17. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), 2012. Accessibility. Internet: http://www.w3.org/standards/webdesign/accessibility (visited 06/03/2012)