New challenges in low-vision research

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 89, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1244-1245

  Chung, Susana T L ^a   Bailey, Ian L ^a   Dagnelie, Gislin ^a   Jackson, Jonathan A ^a   Legge, Gordon E ^a   Rubin, Gary S ^a   Wood, Joanne ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPTOMETRY; PUBLICATION; VISUAL DISORDER;

AGED; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OPTOMETRY; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; VISION, LOW;

EID: 84865704166     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31826ba359     Document Type: Editorial

References (21)

1. Bailey IL. Visual acuity -keeping it clear. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89: 1247-8.
2. Owsley C. Driving with bioptic telescopes: Organizing a research agenda. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1249-56.
3. Bailey IL, Jackson AJ, Minto H, Greer RB, Chu MA. The Berkeley Rudimentary Vision Test (BRVT). Optom Vis Sci 2012;89: 1257-64.
4. Satgunam P, Apfelbaum HL, Peli E. Volume perimetry: Measurement in depth of visual field loss. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1265-75.
5. Crossland MD, Rubin GS. Text accessibility by people with reduced contrast sensitivity. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1276-81.
6. Burton R, Crabb DP, Smith ND, Glen FC, Garway-Heath DF. Glaucoma and reading: Exploring the effects of contrast lowering of text. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1282-7.
7. Chung STL. Dependence of reading speed on letter spacing in central vision loss. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1288-98.
8. Bochsler TM, Legge GE, Kallie CS, Gage R. Seeing steps and ramps with simulated low acuity: Impact of texture and locomotion. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1299-307.
9. Geruschat DR, Bittner AK, Dagnelie G. Orientation and mobility assessment in retinal prosthetic clinical trials. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89:1308-15.
10. Latham K, Tabrett DR. Guidelines for predicting performance with low vision aids. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1316-26.
11. Alabdulkader B, Leat S. Do reading additions improve reading in pre-presbyopes with low vision? Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1327-35.
12. DeCarlo DK, McGwin G, Jr., Searcey K, Gao L, Snow M, Stevens L, Owsley C. Use of prescribed optical devices in age-related macular degeneration. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1336-42.
13. Ross NC, Bowers AR, Peli E. Peripheral prism glasses: Effects of dominance, suppression and background. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89: 1343-52.
14. Satgunam P, Peli E. Torsional ARC effectively expands the visual field in hemianopia. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1353-63.
15. Satgunam P, Woods RL, Luo G, Bronstad PM, Reynolds Z, Ramachandra C, Mel BW, Peli E. Effects of contour enhancement on low-vision preference and visual search. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89: 1364-73.
16. Kwon M, Ramachandra C, Satgunam P, Mel BW, Peli E, Tjan BS. Contour enhancement benefits older adults with simulated central field loss. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1374-84.
17. McIlreavy L, Fiser J, Bex PJ. Impact of simulated central scotomas on visual search in natural scenes. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1385-94.
18. Fletcher DC, Schuchard RA, Renninger LW. Patient awareness of binocular central scotoma in AMD. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1395-8.
19. Wang BZ, Pesudovs K, Keane MC, Daly A, Chen C. Evaluating the effectiveness of multidisciplinary low-vision rehabilitation. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1399-1408.
20. DeCarlo DK, McGwin G, Jr., Bixler ML, Wallander J, Owsley C. Impact of pediatric vision impairment on daily life: Results of focus group. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1409-16.
21. Baskaran K, Rose'n R, Lewis P, Unsbo P, Gustafsson J. Benefit of adaptive optics aberration correction at preferred retinal locus. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1417-23.