The role of visual evoked potential and electroretinography in the preoperative assessment of osteo-keratoprosthesis or osteo-odonto- keratoprosthesis surgery

Acta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 90, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 519-525

  De Araujo, Aline L ^a,b   Charoenrook, Victor ^a   De La Paz, Maria F ^a   Temprano, Jose ^a   Barraquer, Rafael I ^a   Michael, Ralph ^a  

^a INSTITUT UNIVERSITARI BARRAQUER   (Spain)

^b Instituto de Oftalmologia de Porto Alegre   (Brazil)

Author keywords

corneal opacity; electrodiagnosis; electroretinography; keratoprosthesis; ophthalmological diagnostic techniques; visual evoked potentials

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BURN; CHEMICAL BURN; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KERATOPROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MAXIMUM BEST CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY; MUCOUS MEMBRANE PEMPHIGOID; OSTEO KERATOPROSTHESIS; OSTEO ODONTO KERATOPROSTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENSORY SYSTEM ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; STEVENS JOHNSON SYNDROME; TOXIC EPIDERMAL NECROLYSIS; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; ARTIFICIAL ORGANS; CORNEA; CORNEAL DISEASES; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84865685297     PISSN: 1755375X     EISSN: 17553768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02086.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Binder PS, Krachmer JH, Ayazuddin M, &, Hintze R, (1982): Visual prognosis for corneal transplantation based on preoperative visual evoked potential and electroretinogram. Ophthalmology 89: 661-667. (Pubitemid 12086001)
2. Cavender SA, Hobson RR, Chao GM, Weinstein GW, &, Odom JV, (1992): Comparison of preoperative 10-Hz visual evoked potentials to contrast sensitivity and visual acuity after cataract extraction. Doc Ophthalmol 81: 181-188. (Pubitemid 23013108)
3. Ciolino JB, &, Dohlman CH, (2009): Biologic keratoprosthesis materials. Int Ophthalmol Clin 49: 1-9.
4. Fish GE, &, Birch DG, (1989): The focal electroretinogram in the clinical assessment of macular disease. Ophthalmology 96: 109-114. (Pubitemid 19041337)
5. Fuller D, (1978): Evaluation of eyes with opaque media by using bright-flash electroretinography. Int Ophthalmol Clin 18: 121-125. (Pubitemid 9002440)
6. Galloway NR, (1988): Electrophysiological testing of eyes with opaque media. Eye 2: 615-624. (Pubitemid 19141541)
7. Hawlina M, &, Konec B, (1992): New noncorneal HK-loop electrode for clinical electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 81: 253-259. (Pubitemid 23013115)
8. Hille K, Grabner G, Liu C, Colliardo P, Falcinelli G, Taloni M, &, Falcinelli G, (2005): Standards for modified osteoodontokeratoprosthesis (OOKP) surgery according to Strampelli and Falcinelli: the Rome-Vienna Protocol. Cornea 24: 895-908. Comment in: Cornea. 2005; 24:893-4. (Pubitemid 41693386)
9. Hiraiwa T, Horio N, Terasaki H, Suzuki T, Yamamoto E, Horiguchi M, &, Miyake Y, (2003): Preoperative electroretinogram and postoperative visual outcome in patients with diabetic vitreous hemorrhage. Jpn J Ophthalmol 47: 307-311. (Pubitemid 36627464)
10. Hughes EH, Mokete B, Ainsworth G, et al., (2008): Vitreoretinal complications of osteoodontokeratoprosthesis surgery. Retina 28: 1138-1145.
11. Hutton WL, &, Fuller DG, (1984): Factors influencing final visual results in severely injured eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 97: 715-722. (Pubitemid 14082958)
12. Ilhan-Sarac O, &, Akpek EK, (2005): Current concepts and techniques in keratoprosthesis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16: 246-250. (Pubitemid 41073308)
13. Knighton RW, &, Blankenship GW, (1980): Electrophysiological evaluation of eyes with opaque media. Int Ophthalmol Clin 20: 1-19. (Pubitemid 10041482)
14. Lam BL, (2005): Electrophysiology of vision. Clinical testing and applications. Oxford, UK: Taylor and Francis.
15. Liu C, Paul B, Tandon R, et al., (2005): The osteo-odonto- keratoprosthesis (OOKP). Semin Ophthalmol 20: 113-128. (Pubitemid 40904298)
16. Marmor MF, Fulton AB, Holder GE, Miyake Y, Brigell M, &, Bach M,; International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (2009): ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2008 update). Doc Ophthalmol 118: 69-77.
17. Mashima Y, Matsuhashi M, &, Oguchi Y, (1988): Simultaneous recording of visual evoked potentials and electroretinograms in patients with unilateral opaque media. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 66: 47-53. (Pubitemid 18088143)
18. Odom JV, Chao GM, &, Weinstein GW, (1988): Preoperative prediction of postoperative visual acuity in patients with cataracts: a quantitative review. Doc Ophthalmol 70: 5-17.
19. Odom JV, Bach M, Barber C, Brigell M, Marmor MF, Tormene AP, Holder GE, &, Vaegan, (2004): Visual evoked potentials standard (2004). Doc Ophthalmol 108: 115-123. (Pubitemid 39140119)
20. Raju VK, Weinstein GW, &, Pillai L, (1983): Assessment of macular function in anterior segment surgery (diagnostic tests with opaque media). Indian J Ophthalmol 31: 112-114.
21. Rubin ML, &, Dawson WW, (1978): The transscleral VER: prediction of postoperative acuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17: 71-74. (Pubitemid 8277678)
22. Seiple WH, Siegel IM, Carr RE, &, Mayron C, (1986): Evaluating macular function using the focal ERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 27: 1123-1130. (Pubitemid 16062050)
23. Temprano J, (1993): Keratoprosthesis with tibial autograft. KPro Abstracts: proceedings of the first keratoprosthesis study group meeting. Refract Corneal Surg 9: 192-193.
24. Temprano J, (1998): Late results of osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis and tibial keratoprosthesis. An Inst Barraquer 27: 53-65.
25. Terasaki H, Kojima T, Niwa H, Piao CH, Ueno S, Kondo M, Ito Y, &, Miyake Y, (2003): Changes in focal macular electroretinograms and foveal thickness after vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44: 4465-4472. (Pubitemid 37186284)
26. Wendel RT, Mannis MJ, &, Keltner JL, (1984): Role of electrophysiologic testing in the preoperative evaluation of corneal transplant patients. Ann Ophthalmol 16: 788-793. (Pubitemid 14043237)