Interpersonal processes of care and cesarean delivery in two health care settings

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 102, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1722-1728

  Hessol, Nancy A ^a   Odouli, Roxana ^c   Escobar, Gabriel J ^c   Stewart, Anita L ^b   Fuentes Afflick, Elena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Institute for Health and Aging   (United States)

^c DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MULTICENTER STUDY; PUERPERIUM; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; SELF CARE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CALIFORNIA; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT STUDIES; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; ODDS RATIO; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); RISK ASSESSMENT; SELF CARE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865678504     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300549     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: preliminary data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010;59(3):1-19.
2. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Mathews TJ, Osterman MJK. Births: final data for 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010;59(1):1-72.
3. MacDorman MF, Menacker F, Declercq E. Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes. Clin Perinatol. 2008;35(2):293-307v.
4. Murthy K, Grobman WA, Lee TA, Holl JL. Association between rising professional liability insurance premiums and primary cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(6):1264-1269. (Pubitemid 351326068)
5. Williams HO. The ethical debate of maternal choice and autonomy in cesarean delivery. Clin Perinatol. 2008;35(2):455-462 viii. (Pubitemid 351626129)
6. Bangdiwala SI, Brown SS, Cunningham FG, et al. NIH Consensus Development Conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2010;27(3).
7. Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1991. DHHS Publication (PHS) 91-50212.
8. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2008.
9. ACOG Practice Bulletin #54: vaginal birth after previous cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(1):203-212.
10. Stewart AL, Napoles-Springer A, Perez-Stable EJ. Interpersonal processes of care in diverse populations. Milbank Q. 1999;77(3):305-339, 274.
11. Wong ST, Korenbrot CC, Stewart AL. Consumer assessment of the quality of interpersonal processes of prenatal care among ethnically diverse low-income women: development of a new measure. Womens Health Issues. 2004;14(4):118-129. (Pubitemid 39490398)
12. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 9.2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2008.
13. Bryant AS, Washington S, Kuppermann M, Cheng YW, Caughey AB. Quality and equality in obstetric care: racial and ethnic differences in caesarean section delivery rates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009;23(5):454-462.
14. Chung JH, Garite TJ, Kirk AM, Hollard AL, Wing DA, Lagrew DC. Intrinsic racial differences in the risk of cesarean delivery are not explained by differences in caregivers or hospital site of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(5):1323-1328.
15. Bailit JL, Love TE. The role of race in cesarean delivery rate case mix adjustment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(1):69e1-e5.
16. Freitas PF, Drachler Mde L, Leite JC, Marshall T. Inequalities in cesarean delivery rates by ethnicity and hospital accessibility in Brazil. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;107(3):198-201.
17. Zlot AI, Jackson DJ, Korenbrot C. Association of acculturation with cesarean section among Latinas. Matern Child Health J. 2005;9(1):11-20. (Pubitemid 41357410)
18. Kornelsen J, Hutton E, Munro S. Influences on decision making among primiparous women choosing elective caesarean section in the absence of medical indications: findings from a qualitative investigation. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32(10):962-969.