Interaction of applied water amounts and leaf removal in the fruiting zone on grapevine water relations and productivity of Merlot

Irrigation Science

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 363-375

  Williams, Larry E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BERRY WEIGHT; CALIFORNIA; CROP COEFFICIENT; DIRECT SOLAR RADIATION; IRRIGATION TREATMENTS; LEAF REMOVAL; LEAF WATER POTENTIAL; PRODUCTION AREA; RELIABLE ESTIMATES; ROW SPACING; SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY; SOLAR NOON; SOLUBLE SOLIDS; TITRATABLE ACIDITY; WATER AMOUNT; WATER RELATIONS; WATER STATUS;

IRRIGATION; PRODUCTIVITY; PROFITABILITY; WATER SUPPLY; WINE;

FRUITS;

CROP PRODUCTION; CROP YIELD; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FRUITING; HIGH TEMPERATURE; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; LEAF; PLANT WATER RELATIONS; SHADE TOLERANCE; SOLAR RADIATION; SPACING; VINE;

CALIFORNIA; SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY; UNITED STATES;

VITACEAE; VITIS; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 84865653825     PISSN: 03427188     EISSN: 14321319     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00271-012-0355-z     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Allen RA, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. (FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56) FAO, Rome.
2. Amerine MA, Winkler AJ (1944) Composition and quality of musts and wines of California grapes. Hilgardia 15: 493-673.
3. Bergqvist J, Dokoozlian N, Ebisuda N (2001) Sunlight exposure and temperature effects on berry growth and composition of Cabernet Sauvignon and Grenache in the Central San Joaquin Valley of California. Am J Enol Vitic 52: 1-7.
4. Chaves MM, Santos TP, Souza CR, Ortuño MF, Rodriques ML, Lopes CM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS (2007) Deficit irrigation in grapevines improves water-use efficiency while controlling vigour and production quality. Ann Appl Biol 150: 237-252.
5. Crippen DD Jr, Morrison JC (1986) The effects of sun exposure on the phenolic content of Cabernet Sauvignon berries during development. Am J Enol Vitic 37: 243-247.
6. Daane K, Williams LE (2003) Manipulating vineyard irrigation amounts to reduce insect pest damage. Ecol App 13: 1650-1666.
7. Dokoozlian NK, Kliewer WM (1995) The light environment within grapevine canopies. II. Influence of leaf area density on fruit zone light environment and some canopy assessments parameters. Amer J Enol Vitic 46: 219-226.
8. dos Santos TP, Lopes CM, Rodriques ML, de Souza CR, Maroco JP, Pereira JS, Silva JM, Chaves MM (2003) Partial rootzone drying: effects on growth and fruit quality of field-grown grapevines (Vitis vinifera). Funct Plant Biol 30: 663-671.
9. dos Santos TP, Lopes CM, Rodriques ML, de Souza CR, Ricardo-da-Silva JM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS, Chaves MM (2007) Effects of deficit irrigation strategies on cluster microclimate for improving fruit composition of Moscatel field-grown grapevines. Sci Hortic 112: 321-330.
10. Downey MO, Dokoozlian NK, Kristic MP (2006) Cultural practice and environmental impacts on the flavonoid composition of grapes and wine: A review of recent research. Am J Enol Vitic 57: 257-268.
11. Fereres E, Soriano MA (2007) Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. J Exp Bot 58: 147-159.
12. Girona J, Mata M, Del Campo J, Arbonés A, Bartra E, Marsal J (2006) The use of midday leaf water potential for scheduling deficit irrigation in vineyards. Irrig Sci 24: 115-127.
13. Greenspan MD, Schultz HR, Matthews MA (1996) Field evaluation of water transport in grape berries during water deficits. Physiol Plant 97: 55-62.
14. Grimes DW, Williams LE (1990) Irrigation effects on plant water relations and productivity of 'Thompson Seedless' grapevines. Crop Sci 30: 255-260.
15. Koch A, Ebeler S, Williams L, Matthews M (2012) Fruit ripening in Vitis vinifera: light intensity before and not during ripening determines the concentration of 2-methoxy-3-isobutylpyrazine in Cabernet Sauvignon berries. Physiol Plant 145: 275-285.
16. Marsal J, Mata M, Del Campo J, Arbones A, Vallverdú X, Girona J, Olivo N (2008) Evaluation of partial root-zone drying for potential field use as a deficit irrigation technique in commercial vineyards according to two different pipeline layouts. Irrig Sci 26: 347-356.
17. Matthews MA, Anderson MM (1988) Fruit ripening in Vitis vinifera L.: responses to seasonal water deficits. Amer J Enol Vitic 39: 313-320.
18. Netzer Y, Yao C, Shenker M, Bravdo BA, Schwartz A (2009) Water use and the development of seasonal crop coefficients for Superior Seedless grapevines trained to an open-gable trellis system. Irrig Sci 27: 109-120.
19. Rebucci B, Poni S, Intrieri C, Magnanini E, Lakso AN (1997) Effects of manipulated grape berry transpiration on post-version sugar accumulation. Austral J Grape Wine Res 3: 57-65.
20. Rojas-Lara BA, Morrison JC (1989) Differential effects of shading fruit or foliage on the development and composition of grape berries. Vitis 28: 199-208.
21. Salón JL, Chirivella C, Castel JR (2005) Response of cv. Bobal to timing of deficit irrigation in Requena, Spain: Water relations, yield and wine quality. Am J Enol Vitic 56: 1-8.
22. Smart RE, Robinson MD (1991) Sunlight into wine: a handbook for winegrape canopy management. Winetitles, Adelaide.
23. Spayd SE, Tarara JM, Mee DL, Ferguson JC (2002) Separation of sunlight and temperature effects on the composition of Vitis vinifera cv. Merlot berries. Am J Enol Vitic 53: 171-181.
24. Synder RL, Pruitt WO (1992) Evapotranspiration data management in California. In: Proceedings, irrigation and drainage sessions/Water Forum 1992. EE, HY, IR, WR Div/ASCE, Baltimore.
25. van Zyl JL (1987) Diurnal variation in grapevine water stress as a function of changing soil water status and meteorological conditions. S Afr J Enol Vitic 8: 45-52.
26. van Zyl JL, van Huyssteen L (1980) Comparative studies on wine grapes on different trellising systems: I. Consumptive water use. S Afr J Enol Vitic 1: 7-14.
27. c) on productivity of Cabernet Sauvignon. Austral J Grape Wine Res 16: 434-444.
28. Williams LE, Araujo F (2002) Correlations among predawn leaf, midday leaf, and midday stem water potential and their correlations with other measures of soil and plant water status in Vitis vinifera L. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 127: 448-454.
29. 3) and trunk girdling: practices to increase berry size. Agric For Meteor 129: 85-94.
30. Williams LE, Ayars JE (2005b) Grapevine water use and the crop coefficient are linear functions of the shaded area measured beneath the canopy. Agric For Meteor 132: 201-211.
31. Williams LE, Baeza P (2007) Relationships among ambient temperature and vapor pressure deficit and leaf and stem water potentials of fully irrigated, field-grown grapevines. Am J Enol Vitic 58: 173-181.
32. Williams LE, Matthews MA (1990) Grapevine. In: Stewart BA, Nielson DR (eds) Irrigation of agricultural crops: agronomy monograph No. 30. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 1019-1059.
33. Williams LE, Trout TJ (2005) Relationships among vine and soil based measures of water status in a Thompson Seedless vineyard in response to high frequency drip irrigation. Am J Enol Vitic 56: 357-366.
34. Williams LE, Dokoozlian NK, Wample R (1994) Grape. In: Schaffer B, Anderson PC (eds) Handbook of environmental physiology of fruit crops, vol I., Temperate CropsCRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 85-133.
35. Williams LE, Phene CJ, Grimes DW, Trout TJ (2003) Water use of mature Thompson Seedless grapevines in California. Irrig Sci 22: 11-18.
36. Williams LE, Grimes DW, Phene CJ (2010a) The effects of applied water at various fractions of measured evapotranspiration on water relations and vegetative growth of Thompson Seedless. Irrig Sci 43: 221-232.
37. Williams LE, Grimes DW, Phene CJ (2010b) The effects of applied water at various fractions of measured evapotranspiration on reproductive growth and water productivity of Thompson Seedless. Irrig Sci 28: 233-243.
38. Williams LE, Baeza P, Vaughn P (2012) Midday measurements of leaf water potential and stomatal conductance are highly correlated with daily water use of Thompson Seedless grapevines. Irr Sci 30: 201-212.