The model size effect in SEM: Inflated goodness-of-fit statistics are due to the size of the covariance matrix

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 86-98

  Moshagen, Morten ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^b HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Confirmatory factor analysis; Fit assessment; Model size; Sample size; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS; FIT ASSESSMENT; MODEL SIZE; SAMPLE SIZES; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FACTOR ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; SAMPLING;

COVARIANCE MATRIX;

EID: 84865649088     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2012.634724     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.
2. Barrett, P. (Ed.). (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit [Special issue]. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5).
3. Boomsma, A. (1985). Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika, 50, 229-242.
4. Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62-83.
5. Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462-494.
6. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
7. Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Paxton, P., Kirby, J., & Chen, F. (2002). The noncentral chi-square distribution in mis-specified structural equation models: Finite sample results from a Monte Carlo simulation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 1-36.
8. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16-29.
9. Ding, L., Velicer, W. F., & Harlow, L. L. (1995). Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 119-143.
10. Fouladi, R. T. (2000). Performance of modified test statistics in covariance and correlation structure analysis under conditions of multivariate nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 356-410.
11. Gagné, P., & Hancock, G. R. (2006). Measurement model quality, sample size, and solution propriety in confirmatory factor models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 65-83.
12. Herzog, W., & Boomsma, A. (2009). Small-sample robust estimators of noncentrality-based and incremental model fit. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 1-27.
13. Herzog, W., Boomsma, A., & Reinecke, S. (2007). The model-size effect on traditional and modified tests of covariance structures. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 361-390.
14. Hoogland, J. J., & Boomsma, A. (1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 26, 329-367.
15. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventionalcriteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
16. Jackson, D. L. (2001). Sample size and the number of parameter estimates in maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis: A Monte Carlo investigation. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 205-223.
17. Jackson, D. L. (2003). Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the N:q hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 128-141.
18. Jackson, D. L. (2007). The effect of the number of observations per parameter in misspecified confirmatory factor analytic models. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 48-76.
19. Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 333-351.
20. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 181-220.
21. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320-341.
22. Muthén, B. O. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49, 115-132.
23. Muthén, B. O., & Kaplan, D. (1992). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 19-30.
24. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
25. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507-514.
26. Skrondal, A. (2000). Designand analysis of MonteCarlo experiments:Attackingthe conventionalwisdom. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 137-167.
27. Vale, C. D., & Maurelli, V. A. (1983). Simulating multivariate nonnormal distributions. Psychometrika, 48, 465-471.
28. Yuan, K. H., Hayashi, K., & Bentler, P. M. (2007). Normal theory likelihood ratio statistic for mean and covariance structure analysis under alternative hypotheses. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 98, 1262-1282.