Towards an "empowered" user role in the design of large-scale electronic patient records

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 2, Issue , 2012, Pages 65-68

  Silsand, Line ^a   Christensen, Bente ^a   Ellingsen, Gunnar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

Author keywords

configurable technology; electronic patient records; standardized patient pathways; users

Indexed keywords

CONFIGURABILITY; CONFIGURABLE TECHNOLOGY; ELECTRONIC PATIENT RECORD; STANDARDIZED PATIENT PATHWAYS; USER ROLES; USERS;

MEDICAL COMPUTING;

DESIGN;

EID: 84865640313     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2348144.2348165     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Bowker, G.C. and Star, S.L. (1999). Sorting things out. Massachusetts Instititue of Technology.
2. Holten Møller, N, and Bjørn, P. (2011). "Layers in Sorting Practices: Sorting out Patients with Potential Cancer." Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW),2011,123-153.
3. Johannessen, L. and Ellingsen, G. (2008). "Lightweight methods in heavyweight organizations." Proc. PDC 2008, 11-20.
4. Kalra, D. (2006)."Electronic Health Record Standards The Need for Generic and Requirements for Represent". Medical Informatics, 2006, 136-144.
5. Klein, H. K. and Myers, M. D. (1999). A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67.
6. Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147-167.
7. openEHR. (2012). Accessed January 2012 from: http://www.openehr.org/home. html (accessed January 2012)
8. Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2):74-81.
9. Zittrain, J. L. (2008). The generative internet. Harvard LawReview,1974-2040.