Measuring individual disaster recovery: A socioecological framework

Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness

Volumn 4, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2010, Pages

  Abramson, David M ^a   Stehling Ariza, Tasha ^a   Park, Yoon Soo ^a   Walsh, Lauren ^a   Culp, Derrin ^a  

^a Center for International Forestry Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Mediators; Recovery; Socioecological model; Structural equation model

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DISASTER; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; HURRICANE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRY; RELIEF WORK; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STANDARD; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CYCLONIC STORMS; DISASTERS; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; LOUISIANA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MISSISSIPPI; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PSYCHOMETRICS; RELIEF WORK; SOCIAL SUPPORT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865634585     PISSN: 19357893     EISSN: 1938744X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/dmp.2010.14     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q. 2003;84:242-261. (Pubitemid 36737557)
2. Green B, Solomon S. The mental health impact of natural and technological disasters. In: Hobfoll JFaS, ed. Traumatic Stress: From Theory to Practice. New York: Plenum; 1995:163-180.
3. Benight CC, Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: the role of perceived self-efficacy. Behav Res Ther. 2004;42(10):1129-1148. (Pubitemid 39179908)
4. Norris FH, Stevens SP, Pfefferbaum B, Wyche KF, Pfefferbaum RL. Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(1-2):127-150.
5. Bates FL, Pelanda C. An ecological approach to disasters. In: Dynes RR, Tierney KJ, eds. Disasters, Collective Behavior, and Social Organization. Newark: University of Delaware Press; 1993:145-159.
6. Edwards MLK. An interdisciplinary perspective on disasters and stress: the promise of an ecological framework. Sociol Forum. 1998;13:115-132.
7. Kothari A, Edwards N, Yanicki S, et al. Socioecological models: strengthening intervention research in tobacco control. Drogues Sante Societe. 2007;6:iii5-iii6.
8. Tatsuki S. Long-term life recovery processes among survivors of the 1995 Kobe earthquake: 1999, 2001, 2003, and 2005 Life Recovery Social Survey results. J Disaster Res. 2007;2:484-501.
9. Koshiyama K. Analysis of sense of recovery of residents living in disaster recovery public housing. J Inst Soc Safety Sci. 2003;3:237-244.
10. Tatsuki S, Hayashi H. Family system adjustment and adaptive reconstruction of social reality among the 1995 earthquake survivors. Int J Jpn Sociol. 2000;9:81-110.
11. Bratt RG. Housing and family well-being. Housing Stud. 2002;17:13-26. (Pubitemid 34057489)
12. Peacock WG, Dash N, Zhang Y. Sheltering and housing recovery following disaster. In: Rodriguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR, eds. Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer; 2006:258-274.
13. Fothergill A, Peek LA. Poverty and disasters in the United States: a review of recent sociological findings. Nat Hazards. 2004;32:89-110. (Pubitemid 38763380)
14. Enarson E, Morrow BH. The Gendered Terrain of Disaster: Through Women's Eyes. Westport, CT: Praeger; 1998.
15. Morrow BH. Stretching the bonds: the families of Andrew. In: Peacock WG, Morrow BH, Gladwin H, eds. Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender and the Sociology of Disasters. London: Routledge; 1997:141-170.
16. National Research Council. Facing Hazards and Disasters: Understanding Human Dimensions. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.
17. Smith GP, Wenger D. Sustainable disaster recovery: operationalizing an existing agenda. In: Rodriguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR, eds. Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer; 2006:234-257.
18. Heller T. The effects of involuntary residential relocation: a review. Am J Community Psychol. 1982;10(4):471-492.
19. Reich JW. Three psychological principles of resilience in natural disasters. Disaster Prev Manage. 2006;15:793-798. (Pubitemid 44610802)
20. Silove D, Steel Z. Understanding community psychosocial needs after disasters: implications for mental health services. J Postgrad Med. 2006; 52(2):121-125. (Pubitemid 43725878)
21. Chamlee-Wright ER. The long road back: signal noise in the post-Katrina context. Independent Rev. 2007;12:235-259.
22. Chamlee-Wright ER, Daniel M. Disastrous Uncertainty: How Government Disaster Policy Undermines Community Rebound. Mercatus Policy Series, Policy Comment No. 9. Arlington, VA: Mercatus Center at George Mason University; 2007:29.
23. Abramson D, Stehling-Ariza T, Garfield R, Redlener I. Prevalence and predictors of mental health distress post-Katrina: findings from the Gulf Coast Child and Family Health Study. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(2):77-86.
24. Lee SY. Structural Equation Modeling:A Bayesian Approach. New York: Wiley; 2007.
25. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220-233. (Pubitemid 126433231)
26. Ware JE Jr. Improvements in short-form measures of health status: introduction to a series. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(1):1-5. (Pubitemid 350236704)
27. Bollen KA. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.
28. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem S. Generalized self-efficacy scale. In:Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, eds. Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs. Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON; 1995: 35-37.
29. Allen MJ, Yen WM. Introduction to Measurement Theory. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press; 2002.
30. Cook TD, Campbell DT. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues in Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1979.
31. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y, Phillips LW. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Adm Sci Q. 1991;36:421-458.
32. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1-55.