메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 157, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 294-295

Beyond the usual prediction accuracy metrics: Reporting results for clinical decision making

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; CALIBRATION; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EDITORIAL; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; LUNG CANCER; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84865624959     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: 15393704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-4-201208210-00014     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (94)

References (13)
  • 1
    • 73849094087 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing the performance of prediction models: A framework for traditional and novel measures
    • Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR, Gerds T, Gonen M, Obuchowski N, et al. Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology. 2010;21:128-38.
    • (2010) Epidemiology , vol.21 , pp. 128-138
    • Steyerberg, E.W.1    Vickers, A.J.2    Cook, N.R.3    Gerds, T.4    Gonen, M.5    Obuchowski, N.6
  • 2
    • 84865614126 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Predictive accuracy of the Liverpool Lung Project risk model for stratifying patients for computed tomography screening for lung cancer. A case-control and cohort validation study
    • Raji OY, Duffy SW, Agbaje OF, Baker SG, Christiani DC, Cassidy A, et al. Predictive accuracy of the Liverpool Lung Project risk model for stratifying patients for computed tomography screening for lung cancer. A case-control and cohort validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:242-50.
    • (2012) Ann Intern Med , vol.157 , pp. 242-250
    • Raji, O.Y.1    Duffy, S.W.2    Agbaje, O.F.3    Baker, S.G.4    Christiani, D.C.5    Cassidy, A.6
  • 3
    • 0018883380 scopus 로고
    • The threshold approach to clinical decision making
    • Pauker SG, Kassirer JP. The threshold approach to clinical decision making. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:1109-17.
    • (1980) N Engl J Med , vol.302 , pp. 1109-1117
    • Pauker, S.G.1    Kassirer, J.P.2
  • 4
    • 38849091997 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The need for reorientation toward cost-effective prediction
    • Comments on 'Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond' by M.J. Pencina et al., Statistics in Medicine (DOI: 10.1002/sim.2929)
    • Greenland S. The need for reorientation toward cost-effective prediction: comments on 'Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond' by M.J. Pencina et al., Statistics in Medicine (DOI: 10.1002/sim.2929). Stat Med. 2008;27:199-206.
    • (2008) Stat Med , vol.27 , pp. 199-206
    • Greenland, S.1
  • 7
    • 33750905259 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Decision curve analysis: A novel method for evaluating prediction models
    • Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:565-74.
    • (2006) Med Decis Making , vol.26 , pp. 565-574
    • Vickers, A.J.1    Elkin, E.B.2
  • 9
    • 2342571696 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker
    • Pepe MS, Janes H, Longton G, Leisenring W, Newcomb P. Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:882-90.
    • (2004) Am J Epidemiol , vol.159 , pp. 882-890
    • Pepe, M.S.1    Janes, H.2    Longton, G.3    Leisenring, W.4    Newcomb, P.5
  • 10
    • 84865619671 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Software for Decision Curve Analysis. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Accessed at, on 16 July 2012
    • Software for Decision Curve Analysis. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; 2012. Accessed at www.mskcc.org/research/epidemiology-biostatistics/health-outcomes/collaborative/decision-curve-analysis on 16 July 2012.
    • (2012)
  • 11
    • 58149269742 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers
    • Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Elkin EB, Gonen M. Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8:53.
    • (2008) BMC Med Inform Decis Mak , vol.8 , pp. 53
    • Vickers, A.J.1    Cronin, A.M.2    Elkin, E.B.3    Gonen, M.4
  • 12
    • 72949090243 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Putting risk prediction in perspective: Relative utility curves
    • Baker SG. Putting risk prediction in perspective: relative utility curves. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1538-42.
    • (2009) J Natl Cancer Inst , vol.101 , pp. 1538-1542
    • Baker, S.G.1
  • 13
    • 68149124197 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Estimation and comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves
    • Pepe M, Longton G, Janes H. Estimation and comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves. Stata J. 2009;9:1.
    • (2009) Stata J , vol.9 , pp. 1
    • Pepe, M.1    Longton, G.2    Janes, H.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.