Contingent valuation of built heritage properties in a transition country: A case of Lithuania;Nekilnojamojo kultūros paveldo vertinimas taikant numatomojo vertinimo metodą pereinamojo laikotarpio valstybėje: Lietuvos atvejis

International Journal of Strategic Property Management

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 393-415

  Gražuleviciute Vileniske, Indre ^a   Janilionis, Vytautas ^a   Guščinskiene, Jurate ^a   Ažukaite, Ligita ^a  

^a KAUNAS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Built heritage; Contingent valuation method (CVM); Kaunas region; Lithuania; Manor residence; Post communist transition country

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865619533     PISSN: 1648715X     EISSN: 16489179     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/1648715X.2011.638159     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alberini, A. and Cooper, J. (2000) Applications of the contingent valuation method in developing countries. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
2. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P. R., Leamer, R. R., Rander, R. and Schuman, H. (1993) Report of the NOAA Panel on contingent valuation. Washington: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
3. Berend, I. T. (2007) Social shock in transforming Central and Eastern Europe, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 40(3), pp. 269-280. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2007.06.007
4. Brauers, W. K. M. and Zavadskas, E. K. (2010) Project management by MULTIMOORA as an instrument for transition economies, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(1), pp. 5-24. doi:10.3846/tede.2010.01
5. Bowitz, E. and Ibenholt, K. (2009) Economic impacts of cultural heritage - research and perspectives, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 10(1), pp. 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2008.09.002
6. Čepaitiene, R. (2005) Laikas ir akmenys. Kultūros paveldo sampratos moderniojoje Lietuvoje [Time and stones. The notions of cultural heritage in modern Lithuania]. Vilnius: Lietuvos istorijos instituto leidykla. (In Lithuanian)
7. Čepaitiene, R. (2002) Požiūriai i{ogonek} kultūros pavelda{ogonek} dabarties Lietuvoje [The attitudes towards cultural heritage in contemporary Lithuania], Kultūros paminklai, 9(1), pp. 10-19. (In Lithuanian)
8. Čiegis, R., Gavenauskas, A., Petkevičiute, N. and Štreimikiene, D. (2008) Ethical values and sustainable development: Lithuanian experience in the context of globalization, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 14(1), pp. 29-37. doi:10.3846/2029-0187.2008.14.29-37
9. Del Saz Salazar, S. and Marques, J. M. (2005) Valuing cultural heritage: the social benefits of restoring an old Arab tower, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 6(1), pp. 69-77. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2004.09.001
10. Dutta, M., Banerjee, S. and Husain, Z. (2007) Untapped demand for heritage: a contingent valuation study of Prinsep Ghat, Calcutta, Tourism Management, 28(1), pp. 83-95. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2005.07.021
11. Dziegielewska, D. A. and Mendelsohn, R. (2007) Does "No"mean "No"? A protest methodology, Environmental and Resource Economics, 38(1), pp. 71-87. doi:10.1007/s10640-006-9057-4
12. Epstein, R. A. (2003) The regrettable necessity of contingent valuation, Journal of Cultural Economics, 27(3-4), pp. 259-274. doi:10.1023/A:1026375220210
13. Galiniene, B. and Marčinskas, A. (2007) Factors determining the quality of business valuation services in the transformation context, Transformations in Business & Economics, 6(2), pp. 38-50.
14. Greffe, X. (2004) Is heritage an asset or a liability? Journal of Cultural Heritage, 5(3), pp. 301-309. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2004.05.001
15. Jureniene, V. (2010) Creativity - the basis for targeted regional development, Transformations in Business & Economics, 9(3), pp. 158-169.
16. Kinghorn, N. and Willis, K. (2008) Valuing the components of an archaeological site: an application of choice experiment to Vindolanda, Hadrian's Wall, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 9(2), pp. 117-124. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2007.05.006
17. Leggett, C. G., Kleckner, N. S., Boyle, K. J., Duffield, J. W. and Mitchell, R. C. (2003) Social desirability bias in contingent valuation surveys administered through in-person interviews, Land Economics, 79(4), pp. 561-575. doi:10.3368/le.79.4.561
18. Lipscomb, C. (2011) Using contingent valuation to measure property value impacts, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 29(4/5), pp. 448-459. doi:10.1108/14635781111150330
19. Mattia, S., Oppio, A. and Pandolfi, A. (2010) Contingent valuation method and market value: applying stated preference methods in real estate market. In: the proceedings of 17th annual European Real Estate Society conference in Milan, Italy. Available at: http://www.eres2010.org/index.asp?page=papers_download
20. Marčinskas, A. and Galiniene, B. (2005) Property valuation in the context of transformations: the case of Lithuania, Transformations in Business & Economics, 4(1), pp. 139-147.
21. McDonald, S., Malys, N. and Maliene, V. (2009) Urban regeneration for sustainable communities: a case study, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(1), pp. 49-59 doi:10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.49-59
22. Mourato, S., Kontoleon, A. and Danchev, A. (2002) Preserving cultural heritage in transition economies: a contingent valuation study of Bulgarian monasteries. In: Navrud, S. and Ready, R. C. (Eds.), Valuing cultural heritage. Applying environmental valuation techniques to historic buildings, monuments and artifacts. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 68-85.
23. Noonan, D. S. (2003) Contingent valuation and cultural resources: a meta-analytic review of the literature, Journal of Cultural Economics, 27(3-4), pp. 159-176. doi:10.1023/A:1026371110799
24. Roddewig, R. J. and Frey, J. D. (2006) Testing the reliability of contingent valuation in the real estate marketplace, Appraisal Journal, 74(3), pp. 267-280.
25. Roddewig, R. J. and Papke, G. R. (1993) Market value and public value: an exploratory essay, Appraisal Journal, January, pp. 52-62.
26. Ruijgrok, E. C. M. (2006) The three economic values of cultural heritage: a case study in the Netherlands, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 7(3), pp. 206-213. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2006.07.002
27. Samalavičius, A. (2008) Kaita ir te{ogonek}stinumas: kultūros kritikos ese [Change and continuity: the essay of cultural criticism]. Vilnius: Kultūros barai. (In Lithuanian)
28. Sapsford, R. and Abbott, P. (2006) Trust, confidence and social environment in post-communist societies, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39(1), pp. 59-71. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2005.12.003
29. Simons, R. A., Saginor, J., Karam, A. H. and Baloyi, H. (2008) Use of contingent valuation analysis in a developing country: market perceptions of contamination on Johannesburg's mine dumps, International Real Estate Review, 11 (2), pp. 75-104.
30. Stone, H. (2005) Perceived values of recreational urban parks with reference to Simferopol in the Republic of Crimea and Raleigh in the USA, Building and Environment, 40(11), pp. 1538-1547. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.11.022
31. Throsby, D. (2002) Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Vaitkuviene, A. (2010) Processes of patrimonialization in Soviet and post-Soviet Lithuania. Summary of doctoral dissertation, Vilnius: Vilnius University.
33. Venkatachalam, L. (2004) The contingent valuation method: a review, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(1), pp. 89-124. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00138-0
34. Whitehead, J. C. and Blomquist, G. C. (2006) The use of contingent valuation in benefit-cost analysis. In: Alberini, A. and Kahn, J. R. (Eds.), Handbook on contingent valuation. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 92-115.
35. World Bank (2002) Transition. The first tent years. Analysis and lessons for Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Washington, D.C.
36. Žvirblis, A. and Buračas, A. (2010) The consolidated measurement of the financial markets development: the case of transitional economies, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), pp. 266-279. doi:10.3846/tede.2010.17