Hemodynamic changes of fractional flow reserve after double kissing crush and provisional stenting technique for true bifurcation lesions

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 125, Issue 15, 2012, Pages 2658-2662

  Ye, Fei ^a   Chen, Shao Liang ^a   Zhang, Jun Jie ^a   Zhu, Zhong Sheng ^a   Kan, Jing ^a   Tian, Nai Liang ^a   Lin, Song ^a   Liu, Zhi Zhong ^a   You, Wei ^a   Xu, Hai Mei ^a   Xu, Jing ^a  

^a NANJING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bifurcation; Double kissing crush; Fractional flow reserve; Provisional

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; CLOPIDOGREL; HEPARIN; RAPAMYCIN;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BOLUS INJECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY BIFURCATION LESION; CORONARY STENT; DOUBLE KISSING CRUSH STENTING; DRUG ELUTING STENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART DISEASE; HEART INFARCTION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPEREMIA; LOADING DRUG DOSE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PILOT STUDY; PROVISIONAL SIDE BRANCH STENTING; REVASCULARIZATION; STENOSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865614926     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2012.15.003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van't Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Eng J Med 2009; 360: 213-224.
2. Lockle T, Ishida M, Perera D, Chiribiri A, De Silva K, Kozerke S, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0-Tesla to detect hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses as determined by fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 70-75.
3. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van't Veer M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 2105-2111.
4. Hamilos M, Muller O, Cuisset T, Ntalianis A, Chlouverakis G, Sarno G, et al. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation 2009; 120: 1505-1512.
5. Iwasaki K, Matsumoto T. Coronary pressure measurement identifies patients with diffuse coronary artery disease who benefit from coronary revascularization. Coron Artery Dis 2011; 22: 81-86.
6. Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, et al; FAME Study investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 177-184.
7. Applegate RJ. Fractional flow reserve-guided stent therapy for multivessel disease: taking a closer look. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 2822-2824.
8. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 2816-2821.
9. Sarno G, Garg S, Onuma Y, Girasis C, Tonino P, Morel MA, et al. Bifurcation lesions: functional assessment by fractional flow reserve vs. anatomical assessment using conventional and dedicated bifurcation quantitative coronary angiogram. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 76: 817-823.
10. Chen SL, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Chen YD, Patel T, Kawajiri K, et al. Study comparing the double kissing (DK) crush with classical crush for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: The DKCRUSH-1 bifurcation study with drug-eluting stents. Eur J Clin Invest 2008; 38: 361-371.
11. Ye F, Zhang JJ, Tian NL, Lin S, Liu ZZ, Kan J, et al. The acute changes of fractional flow reserve in DK (double kissing), crush, and 1-stent technique for true bifurcation lesions. J Interv Cardiol 2010; 23: 341-345.
12. Chen SL, Ye F, Zhang JJ, Zhu ZS, Lin S, Shan SJ, et al. DK crush technique: modified treatment of bifurcation lesions in coronary artery. Chin Med J 2005; 118: 1746-1750.
13. Pijls NHJ. Optimum guidance of complex PCI by coronary pressure measurement. Heart 2004; 90: 1085-1093.
14. Goktekin O, Kaplan S, Dimopoulos K, Barlis P, Tanigawa J, Vatankulu MA, et al. A new quantitative analysis system for the evaluation of coronary bifurcation lesions: comparison with current conventional methods. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 69: 172-180.
15. Mauri L, Hsieh WH, Massaro JM, Ho KK, D'Agostino R, Cutlip DE. Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. N Eng J Med 2007; 356: 1020-1029.
16. Bon-Kwon Koo, Kyung-Woo Park, Hyun-Jae Kang, Cho YS, Chung WY, Youn TJ, et al. Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 726-732.
17. Koo BK, Kang HJ, Youn TJ, Chae IH, Choi DJ, Kim HS, et al. Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 633-637.
18. Chen SL, Santoso T, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Xu YW, Fu Q, et al. A randomized clinical study comparing double kissing crush with provisional stenting for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the DKCRUSH-II (double kissing crush versus provisional stenting technique for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 914-920.