The role of medical librarians in medical education review articles

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 142-144

  Tannery, Nancy H ^a   Maggio, Lauren A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LIBRARIAN; LITERATURE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; LIBRARIANS; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84865613718     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: 15589439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.100.2.015     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Wikiquote. Isaac Newton [Internet]. 19 Jul 2011 [cited 26 Aug 2011], http://www.en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton.
2. Bordage G. Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Acad Med. 2001 Sep; 76(9):889-96.
3. Patrick TB, Demiris G, Folk LC, Moxley DE, Mitchell JA, Tao D. Evidence-based retrieval in evidence-based medicine. J Med Lib Assoc. 2004 Apr;92(2):196-9.
4. Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G. Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2007 Aug;41(8):737-45. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02777.x.
5. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.
6. Maggio LA, Tannery NH, Kanter SL. Reproducibility of literature search reporting in medical education reviews. Acad Med. 2011 Aug; 86(8):1049-54.
7. Holst R, Funk CJ. State of the art of expert searching: results of a Medical Library Association survey. J Med Lib Assoc. 2005 Jan; 93(1):45-52.
8. Alpi KM. Expert searching in public health. J Med Lib Assoc. 2005 Jan;93(1):97-103.
9. Klein-Fedyshin M. It was the worst of times, it was the best of times: positive trends influencing hospital libraries. J Med Lib Assoc. 2010 Jul; 98(3):196-9. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.98.3.002.
10. RM. Expert searching in consumer health: an important role for librarians in the age of the Internet and the web. J Med Lib Assoc. 2007 Apr;95(2):203-7, e66. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.95.2.203.
11. Sampson M, McGowan J. Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1057.e1-e9. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.007.
12. Institute of Medicine. Standards for systematic reviews [Internet]. The Institute; 31 Mar 2011 [cited 15 Apr 2011], http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Finding-What-Works-in-Health-Care-Standards-for-Systematic-Reviews/Standards.aspx? page 52.
13. Relevo R, Balshem H. Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions [Internet]. In: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews. Bethesda, MD: The Agency; 2011 [cited 15 Apr 2011], http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK53479/.
14. Ilic D, Forbes K. Undergraduate medical student perceptions and use of evidence-based medicine: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2010 Aug 19; 10: 58. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-58.
15. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. JAMA. 1997 Mar 19; 277(11):927-34.