Social implications of residential demand response in cool temperate climates

Energy Policy

Volumn 49, Issue , 2012, Pages 759-769

  Darby, Sarah J ^a   McKenna, Eoghan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Distributed energy resources; Dynamic pricing; Residential demand response

Indexed keywords

COOL CLIMATES; DEMAND RESPONSE; DEMAND-SIDE; DIRECT LOAD CONTROL; DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES; DISTRIBUTED RESOURCES; DYNAMIC PRICING; ECONOMIC POTENTIALS; ELECTRICAL DEMAND; ELECTRICITY USE; ELECTRICITY USERS; ENERGY SYSTEMS; MARKET REGULATION; MEDIUM TERM; REAL TIME PRICING; SMALL LOAD; SMART GRID; SOCIAL IMPLICATION; SUPPLY COSTS; TEMPERATE CLIMATE;

ENERGY RESOURCES; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

CLIMATOLOGY;

COMMODITY PRICE; DEMAND ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ENERGY RESOURCE; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

EID: 84865603907     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.026     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. AECOM, 2011. Energy Demand Research Prject: final analysis. Report for Ofgem, London.
2. Albadi M.H., El-Saadany E.F. Categorising demand response programmes. Electric Power Systems Research 2008, 78(11):1989-1996.
3. Alexander B. Dynamic pricing? Not so fast! A residential consumer perspective. The Electricity Journal 2010, 23(6):39-49.
4. Allcott, H., 2009. Rethinking real time electricity pricing. Paper 09-015, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
5. Appel, J., 2011. Demand-Side Participation in Great Britain's Market for Balancing Services: Technical, Economic and Market Potential for Delivering Balancing Services with Aggregated Demand Response and Enabling Market Design Changes Needed. Unpublished Dissertation for MSc (Environmental Change and Management), Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford.
6. Batlle, C., Rodilla, P., 2009. Electricity demand response tools: status quo and outstanding issues. European Review of Energy Markets. Special issue on incentives for a low-carbon energy future. May 2008.
7. Boshell, F., Veloza, O.P., 2008. Review of developed demand side management programs including different concepts and their results. IEEE Explore, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4641792.
8. Borenstein, S., Jaske, M., Rosenfeld, A., 2002. Dynamic pricing, advanced metering and demand response in electricity markets. Univ of California Energy Institute. CSEM WP 105 http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/PDF/csemwp105.pdf.
9. Brattle Group and Sustainability First GB electricity demand - 2010 and 2025. Initial Brattle electricity demand-side model - scope for demand reduction and flexible response. Sustainability First, London 2012.
10. Caird S., Roy R. Consumer adoption and use of household energy efficiency products. People centred ecodesign project: energy efficiency study. Design innovation group. Open University 2007.
11. CER, 2011. Electricity Smart Metering Customer Behaviour Trials (CBT) Findings Report.
12. Commission for Energy Regulation, Dublin. http://www.cer.ie/en/information-centre-reports-and-publications.aspx?article=5dd4bce4-ebd8-475e-b78d-da24e4ff7339&mode=author.
13. Country Energy The Country Energy Home Energy Efficiency Trial 2005.
14. Crossley, D., 2008. The Role of Advanced Metering and Load Control in Supporting Electricity Networks. IEA Research Report No 5, Task XV of the International Energy Agency Demand Side Management Programme.
15. Crossley D. Tempo electricity tariff-France. Case studies of network-driven DSM. International Energy Agency. Paris 2008.
16. Darby, S., 2008. Why, what, when, how, where and who? Developing UK policy on metering, billing and energy display devices. Proceedings of ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Asilomar, CA. August 17--22. Paper 7, 137.
17. Darby, S.J., 2011. Load management at home: advantages and drawbacks of some 'active demand side' options. Proceedings, 2nd International Conference in Microgeneration and Related Technologies in Buildings, 'Microgen '11', University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, April 4-6.
18. Darby, S.J., in press. Metering: EU policy and implications for fuel poor households. Energy Policy, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.065.
19. DECC The UK low carbon transition plan. National strategy for climate and energy. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London 2009.
20. DECC Digest of UK Energy Statistics 2011.
21. EC, 2010a. Final deliverable, expert Group 1, functionalities of smart grids and smart meters. EU Commission Task Force for Smart Grids.
22. Interpretative note on directive 2009-72/EC concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and directive 2009/73/EC concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas. Retail markets. European Commission, Brussels 2010, EC.
23. Ericson, T., 2009. Energy Policy 37, 3502-3512. http://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/2010-dr-report.pdf.
24. Faruqui A., Sergici S. Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments. Journal of Regulatory Economics 2010, 38:193-225.
25. Faruqui A., Harris D., Hledik R. Unlocking the €53 billion savings from smart meters in the EU: how increasing the adoption of dynamic tariffs could make or break the EU's smart grid investment. Energy Policy 2010, 38:6222-6231.
26. FERC, 2012. http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/demand-response/dem-res-adv-metering.asp.
27. Filippini, M., 2010. Short and long-run time-of-use price elasticities in Swiss residential electricity demand. CEPE Working Paper No. 76, Centre for Energy Policy and Eocnomics, Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology.
28. Frontier Economics, 2010. Economic Analysis of Market, Policy and Technological Drivers of Energy Management Benefits Linked to Smart Metering. A Report for the Department of Energy and Climate Change. London.
29. Goldman, C., Reid, M., Levy, R., Silverstein, A., 2010. Coordination of Energy Efficiency and Demand Response. Report LBNL-30443, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, CA.
30. Gottwalt S., Ketter W., Block C., Collins J., Weinhardt C. Demand side management-a simulation of household behaviour under variable prices. Energy Policy 2011, 39:8163-8174.
31. Guerra-Santin O., Itard L. Occupants' behaviour: determinants and effects on residential heating consumption. Building Research and Information 2010, 38(3):318-338.
32. PNNL, 2007. Pacific Northwest GridWise Testbed Demonstration projects. Part I. Olympic Peninsula Project. PNNL, Richland, Washington. http://www.mendeley.com/research/pacific-northwest-gridwise-testbed-demonstration-projects-part-i-olympic-peninsula-project/#page-1.
33. Herter K. Residential implementation of critical-peak pricing of electricity. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2121-2130.
34. Hirst, D.L., 2011. System frequency-a resource for sustainable electricity. Paper is derived from an invited lecture to the EC Joint Research Council, Petten, 17th November 2011 http://www.davidhirst.com/electricity/documents/SystemFrequencyPaperv06.pdf.
35. Hong, J., Kelly, N.J., Richardson, I., Thomson, M., 2011. The influence of thermal storage on microgeneration flexibility. Paper 102, Proceedings, Microgen II Conference, University of Strathclyde, April 4-6. http://microgen11.supergen-hidef.org/microgenII/CD/index.html.
36. Isaacson, M., Kotewa, L., Star, A., Ozog, M., 2006. Changing how people think about energy. Proceedings, ACEEE, 7-124-7-139.
37. Kim J.-H., Shcherbakova a Common failures of demand response. Energy 2011, 36(2):873-880.
38. Koponen, P., Seppälä, J., 2011. Market price based control of electrical heating loads. Proceedings, 21st International Conference on Electricity distribution, Frankfurt, 6-9 June 2011. Paper 0796.
39. Lampaditou, E., Leach, M., 2005. Evaluating participation of residential customers in demand response programs in the UK. Proceedings, ECEEE summer study, paper 6, 064.
40. Letzler R. Applying Psychology to Economic Policy Design: Using Incentive Preserving Rebates to Increase Acceptance of Critical Peak Electricity Pricing 2006, Center for the Study of Energy Markets, UC Berkeley.
41. Lyon T.P., Michelin M., Jongelan A., Leahy T. Is "smart charging" policy for electric vehicles worthwhile?. Energy Policy 2012, 41:259-268.
42. Lutzenhiser, L., Peters, J., Moezzi, M., Woods, J., 2009. Beyond the price effect in time-of-use programs: results from a municipal utility pilot, 2007-2008. Proceedings, International Energy Program Evaluation Conference, Portland, Oregon. http://drrc.lbl.gov/sites/drrc.lbl.gov/files/lbnl-2750e.pdf?q=pubs/lbnl-2750e.pdf.
43. McKenna, E., Ghosh, K., Thomson, M., 2011. Demand response in low-carbon power systems: a review of residential electrical demand response projects. Proceedings, Microgen II, University of Strathclyde.
44. McKenna E., Richardson I., Thomson M. Smart meter data: balancing consumer privacy concerns with legitimate applications. Energy Policy 2012, 41:807-814.
45. Nevius, M., Pigg, S., 2000. Programmable thermostats that go berserk? Taking a social perspective on space heating in Wisconsin. Proceedings, ACEEE Summer Study, 8.233-8.244.
46. Opinion Leader, 2009. Ofgem Consumer First Panel. Research findings from the Third Events. Report for Ofgem.
47. Owen G., Ward J. Smart tariffs and household demand response for Great Britain. Sustainability First, London, March 2010, 2010.
48. Owen, G., Ward, J., Pooley, M., 2011. GB electricity demand-context and 2010 baseline data. Sustainability First. London.
49. Pavan M. Status and prospective for demand response in Italy. Presentation at workshop on 'Demand response in Europe: status, barriers, opportunities and outlooks'. Joint Research Council of the European Commission. Ispra 2010, 3-4(March):2010.
50. Pyrko, J., 2006. Load demand pricing-case studies in residential buildings. Proceedings, EEDAL '06, London, 21-23 June.
51. Roberts, S., Redgrove, Z., 2011. The Smart Metering Programme: A Consumer Review. Report to Which? by the Centre for Sustainable Energy, Bristol.
52. Quantec, L.L.C., 2004. Analysis of the load impacts and economic benefits of the residential TOU rate option. Prepared for Portland General Electric.
53. Renner, S., Albu, M., van Elburg, H., Heinemann, C., Lazicki, A., Penttinen, L., Puente, F. Saele, H., 2011. European Smart Metering Landscape Report.
54. Roscoe A.J., Ault G. Renewable Power Generation 2010, 4(4):369-382.
55. Rowlands I.H., Furst I.M. The cost impacts of a mandatory move to time-of-use pricing on residential customers: an Ontario (Canada) case-study. Energy Efficiency 2011, 10.1007/s12053-011-9113-y.
56. Saele H., Grande O. Demand response from household customers: experiences from a pilot study in Norway. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 2011, 2(1):102-109.
57. Sernhed, K., 2008. Electricity peak load problems and load management in households. Chapter 6, unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Lund University.
58. SGCC, 2011. Excellence in consumer engagement. Smart Grid Consumer Collaborative, http://smartgridcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/SGCC-Excellence-in-Consumer-Engagement.pdf.pdf.
59. Shaw R., Attree M., Jackson T., Kay M. The value of reducing distribution losses by domestic load-shifting; a network perspective. Energy Policy 2009, 37:3159-3167.
60. Short J.A., Infleld D. Stabilization of grid frequency through dynamic demand control. IEEE Ttansactions on Power Systems 2007, 22(3):1284-1293.
61. Star, A., Isaacson, M., Haeg, D., Kotewa, L., 2010. The Dynamic Pricing Mousetrap:Why Isn't the World Beating Down Our Door? Proceedings, ACEEE summer study, 2257-2268.
62. Stokke A.V., Doorman G.L., Ericson T. An analysis of a demand charge electricity grid tariff in the residential sector. Energy Efficiency 2010, 3:267-282. 10.1007/s12053-009-9071-9.
63. Strengers Y. Air-conditioning Australian households: the impact of dynamic peak pricing. Energy Policy 2010, 38:7312-7322.
64. Strbac G. Demand side management: benefits and challenges. Energy Policy 2008, 36:4419-4426.
65. Strömbäck, J., Dromacque, C., Yassin, M.H., 2011. The Potential of Smart Meter Enabled Programs To Increase Energy and Systems Efficiency: Mass Pilot Comparison. A Report for the European Smart Metering Industry Group. VaasaETT, Global Energy Think Tank.
66. Summit Blue Evaluation of the 2005 energy-smart pricing plan. Prepared for CNT Energy, Chicago. Summit Blue Consulting, Boulder, Colorado 2006.
67. Thomson M., Infield G. Network power-flow analysis for a high penetration of distributed generation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2007, 22(3):1157-1162.
68. Torriti J., Hassan M.G., Leach M. Demand response experience in Europe: policies, programmes and implementation. Energy 2010, 35:1575-1583.
69. Wolsink M. The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: renewable as common pool resources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2012, 16(1):822-835.
70. Wood G., Newborough M. Energy-use information transfer for intelligent homes: enabling energy conservation with central and local displays. Energy and Buildings 2007, 39:495-503.
71. York, D., Kushler, M., 2005. Exploring the relationship between demand response and energy efficiency: a review of experience and discussion of key issues. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy report number U052, Washington DC. http://www.aceee.org/research-report/u052.