The symptom inventory disability-specific short forms for multiple sclerosis: Construct validity, responsiveness, and interpretation

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 93, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1617-1628.e1

  Schwartz, Carolyn E ^a,b   Bode, Rita K ^a,c   Quaranto, Brian R ^a   Vollmer, Timothy ^d,e  

^a DeltaQuest Foundation Inc   (United States)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^e Rocky Mountain MS Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Outcome Assessment; Patient; Psychometrics; Quality of life; Rehabilitation; Symptoms

Indexed keywords

99 ITEM SYMPTOM INVENTORY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLADDER FUNCTION; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COGNITION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DISABILITY SEVERITY; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HAND FUNCTION; HUMAN; INTESTINE FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT MOBILITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SHORT FORM 12; SPASTICITY; VISION;

EID: 84865588165     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: 1532821X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.01.012     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. M.H. Liang Longitudinal construct validity: establishment of clinical meaning in patient evaluative instruments Med Care 38 2000 II84 II90
2. R.D. Hays, D. Hadorn Responsiveness to change: an aspect of validity, not a separate dimension Qual Life Res 1 1992 73 75
3. D.E. Beaton Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness Spine 25 2000 3192 3199 (Pubitemid 32042952)
4. C.B. Terwee, F.W. Dekker, W.M. Wiersinga, M.F. Prummel, P.M. Bossuyt On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation Qual Life Res 12 2003 349 362 (Pubitemid 36612040)
5. D.A. Revicki, R.D. Hays, D. Cella, J. Sloan Recommended methods for determining responsivenes and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes J Clin Epidemiol 61 2008 102 109
6. M.A.G. Sprangers, C.M. Moinpour, T.J. Moynihan, D.L. Patrick, D.A. Revicki Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group Assessing meaningful change in quality of life over time: a user's guide for clinicians Mayo Clin Proc 77 2002 561 571 (Pubitemid 34587346)
7. K.W. Wyrwich, M. Bullinger, N. Aaronson, R.D. Hays, D.L. Patrick, T. Symonds Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes Qual Life Res 14 2005 285 295 (Pubitemid 40576381)
8. S. Embretson, S.P. Reise Item response theory for psychologists 2000 Erlbaum Mahwah
9. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services F.A.D.A. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims 2009 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Washington (DC)
10. P.M. Fayers, D.J. Hand Factor analysis, causal indicators, and quality of life Qual Life Res 6 1997 139 150 (Pubitemid 27207279)
11. H. Tremlett, Y. Zhao, P. Rieckmann, M. Hutchinson New perspectives in the natural history of multiple sclerosis Neurology 74 2010 2004 2015
12. A. Compston, I.R. McDonald, J. Noseworthy McAlpine's multiple sclerosis 4th ed. 2005 Churchill Livingstone New York
13. C.E. Schwartz, T. Vollmer, H. Lee North American Research Consortium on Multiple Sclerosis Outcomes Study Group Reliability and validity of two self-report measures of impairment and disability for MS Neurology 1999 5263 5270
14. K.W. Rammohan, J. Shoemaker Emerging multiple sclerosis oral therapies Neurology 2010 74S47-53
15. S.E. Embretson, S.P. Reise Item response theory for psychologists 2000 Erlbaum Mahwah
16. C.E. Schwartz, G. Welch, P. Santiago-Kelley, R. Bode, X. Sun Computerized adaptive testing of diabetes impact: a feasibility study of Hispanics and non-Hispanics in an active clinic population Qual Life Res 15 2006 1503 1518 (Pubitemid 44736783)
17. P.M. Fayers Quality-of-life measurement in clinical trialsthe impact of causal variables J Biopharm Stat 14 2004 155 176 (Pubitemid 38294758)
18. P.M. Fayers, D.J. Hand Causal variables, indicator variables and measurement scales: an example from quality of life J Royal Stat Soc 165 2002 233 261
19. P.M. Fayers, D.J. Hand, K. Bjordal, M. Groenvold Causal indicators in quality of life research Qual Life Res 6 1997 393 406 (Pubitemid 27359783)
20. C.E. Schwartz, M.P. Merriman, G. Reed, I. Byock Evaluation of the Missoula-VITAS Quality of Life IndexRevised: research tool or clinical tool? J Palliat Med 8 2005 121 135 (Pubitemid 40144259)
21. C.E. Schwartz, R.K. Bode, T. Vollmer The Symptom Inventory disability-specific short forms for multiple sclerosis: reliability and factor structure Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93 2012 1629 1636
22. G. Godin, R.J. Shephard A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community Can J Appl Sport Sci 10 1985 141 146
23. M.J. Hohol, E.J. Orav, H.L. Weiner Disease steps in multiple sclerosis: a simple approach to evaluate disease progression Neurology 45 1995 251 255
24. R.A. Marrie, M. Goldman Validity of performance scales for disability assessment in multiple sclerosis Mult Scler 13 2007 1176 1182 (Pubitemid 351541422)
25. J.E. Ware Jr, M. Kosinski, S.D. Keller A 12-item Short-Form Health Survey Med Care 34 1996 220 233
26. R.W. Motl, C.E. Schwartz, T. Vollmer Continued validation of the Symptom Inventory in multiple sclerosis J Neurol Sci 285 2009 134 136
27. K.L. Haywood, A.M. Garratt, K. Jordan, K. Dziedzic, P.T. Dawes Disease-specific, patient-assessed measures of health outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: reliability, validity, and responsiveness Rheumatology (Oxford) 41 2002 1295 1302 (Pubitemid 35363805)
28. D. Kahneman, A. Tversky Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 47 1979 263 291
29. D. Cella, E.A. Hahn, K. Dineen Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: differences between improvement and worsening Qual Life Res 11 2002 207 221 (Pubitemid 34553502)
30. J. Cohen A power primer Psychol Bull 112 1992 155 159
31. T.G. Fong, M.A. Fearing, R.N. Jones Telephone interview for cognitive status: creating a crosswalk with the Mini-Mental State Examination Alzheimers Dement 5 2009 492 497
32. A.W. Wu, I.C. Huang, A.L. Gifford, K.L. Spritzer, S.A. Bozzette, R.D. Hays Creating a crosswalk to estimate AIDS Clinical Trials Group quality of life scores in a nationally representative sample of persons in care for HIV in the United States HIV Clin Trials 6 2005 147 157 (Pubitemid 41341729)
33. R.G.J. Miller Simultaneous statistical inference 1991 Springer-Verlag New York
34. G.H. Guyatt, G.R. Norman, E.F. Juniper, L.E. Griffith A critical look at transition ratings J Clin Epidemiol 55 2002 900 908 (Pubitemid 35246561)
35. J.C. Hill, J.M. Fritz Psychosocial influences on low back pain, disability, and response to treatment Phys Ther 91 2011 712 721
36. F.J. Oort Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change Qual Life Res 14 2005 587 598 (Pubitemid 40576848)
37. G.W. Donaldson Structural equation models for quality of life response shifts: promises and pitfalls Qual Life Res 14 2005 2345 2351 (Pubitemid 41674437)
38. R.N. Jones, J. Manly, M.M. Glymour, D.M. Rentz, A.L. Jefferson, Y. Stern Conceptual and measurement challenges in research on cognitive reserve J Int Neuropsychol Soc 17 2011 593 601