Cortical auditory evoked potential in aging: Effects of stimulus intensity and noise

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1105-1112

  Kim, Jae Ryong ^a   Ahn, Soo Yong ^b   Jeong, Sung Wook ^b   Kim, Lee Suk ^b   Park, Ji Sang ^b   Chung, Seung Hyun ^b   Oh, Min Kyung ^a  

^a Inje University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Dong A University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Aging; Cortical auditory evoked potential; Intensity; Noise

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; AGING; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 84865587267     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182659b1e     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Humes LE. Speech understanding in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1996;7:61-7.
2. Martin JS, Jerger JF. Some effects of aging on central auditory processing. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42:25-44.
3. Committee on Hearing and Bioacoustics and Biomechanics (CHABA). Speech understanding and aging. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;83:859-95.
4. Frisina DR, Frisina RD. Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms. Hear Res 1997;106:95-104.
5. Strouse A, Ashmead DH, Ohde RN, Grantham DW. Temporal processing in the aging auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;104: 2385-99.
6. Schneider BA, Pichora-Fuller MK. Age-related changes in temporal processing: implications for speech perception. Semin Hear 2001;22: 227-39.
7. Harkrider AW, Plyler PN, Hedrick MS. Effects of age and spectral shaping on perception and neural representation of stop consonant stimuli. Clin Neurophysiol 2005;116:2153-64.
8. Tremblay KL, Piskosz M, Souza P. Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues. Clin Neurophysiol 2003;114:1332-43.
9. Dorman MF, Marton K, Hannley MT, Lindholm JM. Phonetic identification by elderly normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1985;77:664-70.
10. Gaeta H, Friedman D, Ritter W, Cheng J. An event-related potential study of age-related changes in sensitivity to stimulus deviance. Neurobiol Aging 1998;19:447-59.
11. Zeng FG, Oba S, Garde S, Sininger Y, Starr A. Temporal and speech processing deficits in auditory neuropathy. Neuroreport 1999;10: 3429-35.
12. Uhlhaas PJ, Roux F, Rodriguez E, Rotarska-Jagiela A, Singer W. Neural synchrony and the development of cortical networks. Trends Cogn Sci 2010;14:72-80.
13. Michalewski HJ, Starr A, Zeng FG, Dimitrijevic A. N100 cortical potentials accompanying disrupted auditory nerve activity in auditory neuropathy (AN): effects of signal intensity and continuous noise. Clin Neurophysiol 2009;120:1352-63.
14. Näätänen R, Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987;24:375-425.
15. Woods DL. The component structure of the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;44:102-9.
16. Phillips DP, Hall SE. Response timing constraints on the cortical representation of sound time structure. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;88: 1403-11.
17. Picton TW, Woods DL, Baribeau-Braun J, Healey TM. Evoked potential audiometry. J Otolaryngol 1976;6:90-119.
18. Billings CJ, Tremblay KL, Stecker GC, Tolin WM. Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level. Hear Res 2009;254:15-24.
19. Tremblay KL, Billings C, Rohila N. Speech evoked cortical potentials: effects of age and stimulus presentation rate. J Am Acad Audiol 2004;15:226-37.
20. Hellstrom LI, Schmiedt RA. Compound action potential input/ output functions in young and quiet-aged gerbils. Hear Res 1990; 50:163-74.
21. Backoff PM, Caspary DM. Age-related changes in auditory brainstem responses in Fischer 344 rats: effects of rate and intensity. Hear Res 1994;73:163-72.
22. Rosenhall U, Björkman G, Pedersen K, Kall A. Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in different age groups. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985;62:426-30.
23. Vander Werff KR, Burns KS. Brain stem responses to speech in younger and older adults. Ear Hear 2011;32:168-80.
24. Mills JH, Schmiedt RA, Kulish LF. Age-related changes in auditory potentials of Mongolian gerbil. Hear Res 1990;46:201-10.
25. Anderer P, Semlitsch HV, Saletu B.Multichannel auditory event-related brain potentials: effects of normal aging on the scalp distribution of N1, P2, N2 and P300 latencies and amplitudes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996;99:458-72.
26. Kelly-Ballweber D, Dobie RA. Binaural interaction measured behaviorally and electrophysiologically in young and old adults. Audiology 1984;23:181-94.
27. Woods DL, Clayworth CC. Age-related changes in human middle latency auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1986;65:297-303.