The complementarities and contextualities of corporate R&D strategies: An empirical analysis of Korean manufacturing industry

Journal of Management and Organization

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 311-333

  Choi, Donghyuk ^a   Lee, Sungki ^b   Kim, Yeonbae ^c  

^a Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP)   (South Korea)

^b Korea Institute of Intellectual Property   (South Korea)

^c Institute of Chemical Processes   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Commissioned R D; Complementarity; Contextuality; In house R D; Joint R D

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865557255     PISSN: 18333672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/jmo.2012.18.3.311     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571-582.
2. Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1994). Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 24(1), 91-114.
3. Bojica, A. M., Fuentes Fuentes, M. M., & Gómez-Gras, J. M. (2011). Radical and incremental entrepreneurial orientation: The effect of knowledge acquisition. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(3), 326-343.
4. Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68-82.
5. Catozzella, A., & Vivarelli, M. (2007). The catalysing role of in-house R&D in fostering the complementarity of innovative inputs (IZA Discussion Paper No. 3126). Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
6. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
7. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: Two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99(397), 569-596.
8. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
9. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504-1511.
10. Dowd, B., Feldman, R., Cassou, S., & Finch, M. (1991). Health plan choice and the utilization of health care services. Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(1), 85-93.
11. Ennen, E., & Richter, A. (2010). The whole is more than the sum of its parts - or is it? A review of the empirical literature on complementarities in organizations. Journal of Management, 36(1), 207-233.
12. Ernst, H., Lichtenthaler, U., & Vogt, C. (2011). The impact of accumulating and reactivating technological experience on R&D alliance performance. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1194-1216.
13. Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., & Tribo, J. A. (2009). Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 38(1), 96-105.
14. Fey, C. F., & Birkinshaw, J. (2005). External sources of knowledge, governance mode, and R&D performance. Journal of Management, 31(4), 597-621.
15. Garud, R., & Nayyar, P. R. (1994). Transformative capacity: Continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 365-385.
16. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Market incumbency and technological inertia. Marketing Science, 10(2), 161-171.
17. Gresov, C., Haveman, H. A., & Oliva, T. A. (1993). Organizational design, inertia and the dynamics of competitive response. Organization Science, 4(2), 181-208.
18. Grimpe, C., & Kaiser, U. (2010). Balancing internal and external knowledge acquisition: The gains and pains from R&D outsourcing. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), 1483-1509.
19. Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153-161.
20. Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2-9.
21. Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999-1015.
22. Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the not-invented-here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management,12(1), 7-19
23. Kim, J. K., & Lee, C. H. (2002). Insolvency in the corporate sector and financial crisis in Korea. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 7(2), 267-281.
24. Kodde, D.A., & Palm, F.C. (1986). Wald criteria for jointly testing equality and inequality restrictions. Econometrica, 54(5), 1243-1248.
25. Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833-863.
26. Lee, L. F. (1983). Generalized econometric models with selectivity. Econometrica, 51(2), 507-512.
27. Lichtenthaler, E. (2004). Organising the external technology exploitation process: Current practices and future challenges. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(2-3), 255-271.
28. Lichtenthaler, U. (2011). Open innovation: Past research, current debates, and future directions. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 75-93.
29. Lichtenthaler, U., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). A capability-based framework for open innovation: Complementing absorptive capacity. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1315-1338.
30. Lund Vinding, A. (2006). Absorptive capacity and innovation performance: A human capital approach. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(4), 507-517.
31. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
32. Marsh, S. J., & Stock, G. N. (2006). Creating dynamic capability: The role of intertemporal integration, knowledge retention, and interpretation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(5), 422-436.
33. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105-142). New York, NY: The Academic Press.
34. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1990). The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. American Economic Review, 80(3), 511-528.
35. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1995). Complementarities and fits: Strategy, structure and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(2-3), 179-208.
36. Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Bjorkman, I., Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. (2003). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6), 586-599.
37. Mowery, D. C. (1984). Firm structure, government policy, and the organization of industrial research. Business History Review, 58(4), 504-531.
38. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1998). Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, 27(5), 507-523.
39. Nakamura, K., & Odagiri, H. (2005). R&D boundaries of the firm: an estimation of the double-hurdle model on commissioned R&D, joint R&D, and licensing in Japan. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(7), 583-615.
40. Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67(3), 297-306.
41. Newey, L. R., & Verreynne, M. L. (2011). Multilevel absorptive capacity and interorganizational new product development: A process study. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(1), 39-55.
42. OECD. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
43. Parmigiani, A. (2007). Why do firms both make and buy? An investigation of concurrent sourcing. Strategic Management Journal, 28(3), 285-311.
44. Pisano, G. (1990). The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 153-176.
45. Porter, M. E., & Rivkin, J. W. (1998). Activity systems as barriers to imitation (Working paper No. 98-066). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
46. Porter, M. E., & Siggelkow, N. (2008). Contextuality within activity systems and sustainability of competitive advantage. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(2), 34-56.
47. Rammer, C., Czarnitzki, D., & Spielkamp, A. (2009). Innovation success of non-R&D-performers: Substituting technology by management in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 35-58.
48. Sampson, R. C. (2007). R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 364-386.
49. Schmidt, T. (2005). Knowledge flows and R&D cooperation: Firm-level evidence from Germany (ZEW Discussion Paper No. 05-22). Mannheim, Germany: Center for European Economic Research (ZEW).
50. Schmiedeberg, C. (2008). Complementarities of innovation activities: An empirical analysis of the German manufacturing sector. Research Policy, 37(9), 1492-1503.
51. Steensma, H. K., & Corley, K. G. (2000). On the performance of technology-sourcing partnerships: The interaction between partner interdependence and technology attributes. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1045-1067.
52. Steensma, H. K., & Corley, K. G. (2001). Organizational context as a moderator of theories on firm boundaries for technology sourcing. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 271-291.
53. Suseno, Y., & Ratten, V. (2007). A theoretical framework of alliance performance: The role of trust, social capital and knowledge development. Journal of Management & Organization, 13(1), 4-23.
54. Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review, 40(3), 55-79.
55. Tyler, B. B. (2001). The complementarity of cooperative and technological competencies: a resource-based perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18(1), 1-27.
56. Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 57-91.
57. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets and relational contracting. New York, NY: The Free Press.
58. Zahra, A. S., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, re-conceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
59. Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917-955.