The role of the surface fine-grained laminae in low-gradient streams: A model approach

Geomorphology

Volumn 171-172, Issue , 2012, Pages 127-138

  Russo, Joseph ^a   Fox, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Erosion; Sediment transport modeling; Surface fine grained lamina; Watershed

Indexed keywords

EROSION RATE; FINE GRAINED SEDIMENT; FLOW FIELD; FLOW MODELING; FLUVIAL DEPOSIT; GEOMORPHOLOGICAL RESPONSE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; STREAM BED;

KENTUCKY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84865557026     PISSN: 0169555X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ahmandi S., Amin S., Keshavarzi A.R., Mirzamostafa N. Simulating watershed outlet sediment concentration using the ANSWERS model by applying two sediment transport capacity equations. Biosystems Engineering 2006, 94:615-626.
2. Aksoy H., Kavvas M.L. A review of hillslope and watershed scale erosion and sediment transport models. Catena 2005, 64:247-271.
3. Bergman M.J., Green W., Donnangelo L.J. Calibration of storm loads in the South Prong watershed, Florida. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2002, 38(5):1423-1436.
4. Chang H.H. Fluvial Processes in River Engineering 1988, Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, Fl.
5. Chien N., Wan Z. Mechanics of Sediment Transport 1999, ASCE Press, ISBN 0-7844-0400-3.
6. Coulter C.B., Kolka R.K., Thompson J.A. Water quality in agricultural, urban, and mixed land use watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2004, 40:1593-1601.
7. Davis, C.M., 2008. Sediment fingerprinting using organic matter tracers to study streambank erosion and streambed sediment storage processes in the South Elkhorn watershed. M.S. Thesis, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
8. Decho A.W. Microbial exopolymer secretions in ocean environments: their role(s) in food webs and marine processes. Oceanography Marine Biology Annual Review 1990, 28:73-153.
9. Donigian A.S. Watershed model calibration and validation: the HSPF experience. Proc. WEF National TMDL Science and Policy 2002, Water Environment Federation, Phoenix, Arizona.
10. Dou G.R. Similarity Theory and Its Application to the Design of Total Sediment Transport Model 1974, Research Bulletin of Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, China.
11. Droppo I.G., Stone M. In-channel surficial fine-grained sediment laminae. Part I: Physical characteristics and formational processes. Hydrological Processes 1994, 8(2):101-111. (March/April 1994).
12. Droppo I.G., Amos C.L. Structure, stability, and transformation of contaminated lacustrine surface fine-grained laminae. Journal of Sedimentary Research 2001, 71(5):717-726.
13. Droppo I.G., Leppard G.G., Flannigan D.T., Liss S.N. The freshwater floc: a functional relationship of water and organic and inorganic floc constituents affecting suspended sediment properties. Water Air and Soil Pollution 1997, 99:43-53.
14. Duan J.G., Nanda S.K. Two-dimensional depth-averaged model simulation of suspended sediment concentration distribution in a groyne field. Journal of Hydrology 2006, 327:426-437.
15. FISRWG Stream corridor restoration: principles, processes, and practices. Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group. GPO Item No. 0120-A; SuDocs No. A 57.6/2:EN 3/PT.653 1998.
16. Fox J.F., Davis C.M., Martin D.K. Sediment source assessment in a lowland watershed using nitrogen stable isotopes. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2010, 46:1192-1204.
17. Green T.R., Beavis S.G., Dietrich C.R., Jakeman A.J. Relating stream-bank erosion to in-stream transport of suspended sediment. Hydrological Processes 1999, 13:777-787.
18. Guy B.T., Dickenson W.T., Sohrabi T.M., Rudra R.P. Development of an empirical model for calculating sediment-transport capacity in shallow overland flows: model calibration. Biosystems Engineering 2009, 103:245-255.
19. Hanson G.J., Simon A. Erodibility of cohesive sediments in the loess area of the midwestern USA. Hydrological Processes 2001, 15:23-38.
20. Hessel R., Jetten V. Suitability of transport equations in modeling soil erosion for a small loess plateau catchment. Engineering Geology 2007, 91:56-71.
21. Jarritt N.P., Lawrence D.S.L. Fine sediment delivery and transfer in lowland catchments: modeling suspended sediment concentrations in response to hydrological forcing. Hydrological Processes 2007, 21:2729-2744.
22. Julien P.Y., Simons D.B. Sediment transport capacity of overland flow. American Society of Agricultural Engineers 1985, 28(3):755-762.
23. Kies L., Fast T., Wolfstein K., Hoberg M.L. On the role of algae and their exopolymers in the formation of suspended particulate matter in the Elbe estuary (Germany). Archives Hydrobiologica Special Issues on Advanced Limnology 1996, 47:93-103.
24. Kinsey-Henderson A.E., Post D.A., Prosser I.P. Modeling sources of sediment at sub-catchment scale: an example from Burdekin catchment, North Queensland, Australia. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 2005, 69:90-102.
25. Langendoen E.J., Simon A., Thomas R.E. Proceedings of the 2001 Wetlands Engineering and River Restoration Conference 2001, 1233-1243.
26. Lartiges B.S., Deneux-Mustin S., Villemin G., Mustin C., Barrès O., Chamerois M., Gerard B., Babut M. Composition, structure, and size distribution of suspended particulates from the Rhine River. Water Research 2001, 35(3):808-816.
27. Liu W.C., Hsu M.H., Kuo A.Y. Modelling of hydrodynamics and cohesive sediment transport in Tanshui River estuarine system, Taiwan. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2002, 44(10):1076-1088. (44).
28. Long J.L.A., House W.A., Parker A., Rae J.E. Micro-organic compounds associated with sediments in the Humber rivers. The Science of the Total Environment 1998, 210-211:229-253.
29. Madej M.A., Sutherland S.G., Lisle T.E., Pryor B. Channel responses to varying sediment input: a flume experiment modeled after Redwood Creek, California. Geomorphology 2009, 103:507-519.
30. Merritt W.S., Letcher R.A., Jakeman A.J. A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environmental Modeling & Software 2003, 18:761-799.
31. Millar R.G., Quick M.C. Stable width and depth of gravel-bed rivers with cohesive banks. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 1998, 124(10):1005-1013.
32. Morris G.L., Fan J. Reservoir Sedimentation Handbook 1997, McGraw-Hill, NY, 848pp.
33. Mosselman E. Morphological modeling of rivers with erodible banks. Hydrological Processes 1998, 12:1357-1370.
34. Nash J.E., Sutcliff J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part 1 - a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 1970, 10(3):282-290.
35. Owens P.N., Walling D.E., Carton J., Meharg A.A., Wright J., Leeks G.J.L. Downstream changes in the transport and storage of sediment-associated contaminates (P, Cr and PCBs) in agricultural and industrialized drainage basins. The Science of the Total Environment 2001, 266:177-186.
36. Richardson J., Jowett I.G. Effects of sediment on fish communities in East Cape streams, North Island, New England. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 2002, 36:431-442.
37. Sanford L.P., Maa J.P.Y. A unified erosion formulation for fine sediments. Marine Geology 2001, 179:9-23.
38. Simon A. Fine sediment loadings to Lake Tahoe. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2008, 44:618-639.
39. Simon A., Thomas R.E. Processes and forms of an unstable alluvial system with resistant, cohesive streambeds. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 2002, 27:699-718.
40. Simon A., Curini A., Darby S., Langendoen E.J. Bank and near-bank processes in an incised channel. Geomorphology 2000, 35:193-217.
41. Simon A., Pollen-Bankhead N., Mahacek V., Langendoen E. Quantifying reductions of mass-failure frequency and sediment loadings from streambanks using toe protection and other means: Lake Tahoe, United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2009, 45:170-186.
42. Smith H.G., Dragovich D. Sediment budget analysis of slope-channel coupling and in-channel sediment storage in an upland catchment, southeastern Australia. Geomorphology 2008, 101:643-654.
43. Sliter M.M. The life-cycle of sediment aggregates in upland agricultural and mining watersheds 2007, Kentucky Water Resources Annual Symposium, Lexington, KY.
44. Spiro T.G., Stigliani W.M. Chemistry and the Environment 2002, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 498pp.
45. Stehr G., Zörner S., Böttcher B., Koops H.P. Exopolymers: an ecological characteristic of a floc-attached, ammonia-oxidizing bacterium. Microbial Ecology 1995, 30(2):115-126.
46. Stone M., Droppo I.G. In-channel surficial fine grained sediment lamina. Part II: chemical characteristics and implications for contaminant transport in fluvial systems. Hydrological Processes 1994, 8:113-124.
47. Thoms M.C. Channel sedimentation within the urbanized River Tame, UK. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 1987, 1:229-246.
48. Thornton D.C. Diatom aggregation in the sea: mechanisms and ecological implications. European Journal of Phycology 2002, 37:149-161.
49. USEPA Protocol for Developing Sediment TMDLs 1999, EPA 841-B-99-004, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
50. USEPA The Incidence and Severity of Sediment Contamination in Surface Waters of the United States 2004, EPA 823-R-04-007, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
51. Viney N.R., Sivapalan M. A conceptual model of sediment transport: application to the Avon River basin in Western Australia. Hydrological Processes 1999, 13:727-743.
52. Walling D.E., Collins A.L., Jones P.A., Leeks G.J.L., Old G. Establishing fine-grained sediment budgets for the Pang and Lambourn LOCAR catchments, UK. Journal of Hydrology 2006, 330:126-141.
53. Wilkinson S.N., Prosser I.P., Rustomji P., Read A.M. Modeling and testing spatially distributed sediment budgets to relate erosion processes to sediment yields. Environmental Modeling and Software 2009, 24:489-501.
54. Wood P.J., Armitage P.D. Biological effects of fine sediments on the lotic environment. Environmental Management 1997, 21(2):203-217.
55. Wörner U., Zimmermann-Timm H., Kausch H. Aggregate associated bacteria and heterotrophic flagellates in the River Elbe - their relative significance along the longitudinal profile from 46km to 583km. International Review of Hydrobiology 2002, 87:255-266.
56. Wynn T.M., Henderson M.B., Vaughan D.H. Changes in streambank erodibility and critical shear stress due to subaerial processes along a headwater stream southwestern Virginia, USA. Geomorphology 2008, 97:260-273.
57. Yan L.J., Yu X.X., Lei T.W., Qu L.Q. Effects of transport capacity and erodibility on rill erosion processes: a model study using the Finite Element method. Geoderma 2008, 146:114-120.
58. Zappou C. Review of urban storm water models. Environmental Modeling & Software 2001, 16:195-231.
59. Zimmerman-Timm H. Characteristics, dynamics and importance of aggregates in rivers - an invited review. International Review of Hydrobiology 2002, 87(2-3):197-240.