Rhythmic priming enhances the phonological processing of speech

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 50, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 2652-2658

  Cason, Nia ^a   Schön, Daniele ^a  

^a TIMONE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

EEG; Rhythm; Speech and music; Temporal expectation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MUSIC; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; RHYTHMIC PRIME; SPEECH AND LANGUAGE; SPEECH PROCESSING; VERBALIZATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERIODICITY; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; SPEECH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865555576     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.018     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Barnes R., Jones M.R. Expectancy, attention, and time. Cognitive Psychology 2000, 41:254-311.
2. Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2012) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.05, (accessed 20 February 2012). http://www.praat.org/.
3. Correa Á, Lupiáñez J., Madrid E., Tudela P. Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research 2006, 1076:116-128.
4. Coull J.T., Frith C.D., Büchel C., Nobre A.C. Orienting attention in time: behavioural and neuroanatomical distinction between exogenous and endogenous shifts. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:808-819.
5. Cummins F., Port R. Rhythmic constraints on stress timing in English. Journal of Phonetics 1998, 26:145-171.
6. Dilley L.C., McAuley J.D. Distal prosodic context affects word segmentation and lexical processing. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:294-311.
7. Doherty J.R., Rao A., Mesulam M.M., Nobre A.C. Synergistic effect of combined temporal and spatial expectations on visual attention. The Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25:8259-8266.
8. Donchin E., Karis D., Bashore T.R., Coles M.G.H., Gratton G. Cognitive psychophysiology: systems, processes, and applications. Psychophysiology: systems, processes, and applications 1986, 244-267. The Guilford Press, New York. M.G.H. Coles, E. Donchin, S. Porges (Eds.).
9. Duncan-Johnson C.C., Donchin E. On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 1977, 14:456-467.
10. Ganong W.F. Phonetic categorisation in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1980, 6:110-125.
11. Griffin I.C., Miniussi C., Nobre A. Multiple mechanisms of selective attention: differential modulation of stimulus processing by attention to space or time. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:2325-2340.
12. Herholz, S.C., Claudia Lappe, C. & Pantev, C. (2009). Looking for a pattern: an MEG study on the abstract mismatch negativity in musicians and nonmusicians. BMC Neuroscience 2009, 10.
13. Hirst D.J., Di Cristo A. A survey of intonation systems. Intonation systems: a survey of twenty languages 1998, 1-44. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. D.J. Hirst, A. Di Cristo (Eds.).
14. Jones M.R., Boltz M. Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review 1989, 96:459-491.
15. Jones M.R., Boltz M., Kidd G. Controlled attending as a function of melodic and temporal context. Perception and Psychophysics 1982, 32:211-238.
16. Jones M.R., Moynihan H., MacKenzie N., Puente J. Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays. Psychological Science 2002, 13:313-319.
17. Jusczyk P. How infants begin to extract words from speech. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999, 3:323-328.
18. Kotz S.A. A critical review of ERP and fMRI evidence on L2 syntactic processing. Brain and Language 2008, 109:68-74.
19. Kutas M., McCarthy G., Donchin E. Augmenting mental chronometry: P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science 1977, 197:792-795.
20. Large E.W., Palmer C. Perceiving temporal regularity in music. Cognitive Science 2002, 26:1-37.
21. Large E.W., Jones M.R. The dynamics of attending: how people track time-varying events. Psychological Review 1999, 106:119-159.
22. Large E.W., Snyder J.S. Pulse and meter as neural resonance. The Neurosciences and Music III-Disorders and Plasticity; Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2009, 1169:46-57.
23. Lehiste I. Isochrony reconsidered. Journal of Phonetics 1977, 5:253-263.
24. Lehiste I. Phonetic manifestation of syntactic structure in English. Annual Bulletin Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, University of Tokyo 1980, 14:1-27.
25. Lenden J.M., Flipsen P. Prosody and voice characteristics of children with cochlear implants. Journal of Communication Disorders 2007, 40:66-81.
26. Lerdahl F., Jackendoff R. A generative theory of tonal music 1983, MA: MIT Press, Cambridge.
27. List A., Justus T., Robertson L.C., Bentin S. A mismatch negativity study of local-global auditory processing. Brain Research 2007, 11:122-133.
28. Magliero A., Bashore T.R., Coles M.G.H., Donchin E. On the dependence of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes. Psychophysiology 1984, 21:171-186.
29. Magne C., Astesano C., Aramaki M., Ystad S., Kronland-Martinet R., Besson M. Influence of syllabic lengthening on semantic processing in spoken French: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:2659-2668.
30. Makeig S., Bell A.J., Jung T.-P., Sejnowski T. Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic data. Advances in neural information processing systems 1996, 8. MA: MIT Press, Cambridge. D.S. Touretzky, M.C. Mozer, M.E. Hasselmo (Eds.).
31. Martin J. Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behavior. Psychological Review 1972, 79:487-509.
32. Meltzer R.H., Martin J.G., Mills C.B., Imhoff D.L., Zohar D. Reaction time to temporally-displaced phoneme targets in continuous speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1976, 2:277-290.
33. Miniussi C., Wilding E.L., Coull J.T., Nobre A.C. Orienting attention in time. Brain 1999, 122:1507-1518.
34. Näätänen R. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral Brain Sciences 1990, 13:201-288.
35. New B., Pallier C., Ferrand L., Matos R. Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L'Année Psychologique 2001, 101:447-462.
36. Patel A. Music, language and the brain 2008, Oxford University Press, New York.
37. Pitt M.A., Samuel A.G. The use of rhythm in attending to speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1990, 16:564-573.
38. Pitt M.A., Samuel A.G. Lexical and sublexical feedback in auditory word recognition. Cognitive Psychology 1995, 29:149-188.
39. Port R.F. Meter and speech. Journal of Phonetics 2003, 31:599-611.
40. Quené H., Port R.F. Effects of timing regularity and metrical expectancy on spoken-word perception. Phonetica 2005, 62:1-13.
41. Rothermich, Schmidt-Kassow, Kotz Rhythm's gonna get you: regular meter facilitates semantic sentence processing. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:232-244.
42. Sams M., Hari R., Rif J., Knuutila J. The human auditory sensory memory trace persists about 10s: neuromagnetic evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1993, 5:363-370.
43. Sams M., Kaukoranta E., Hämäläinen M., Näätänen R. Cortical activity elicited by changes in auditory stimuli: different sources for the magnetic N100m and mismatch responses. Psychophysiology 1991, 28:21-29.
44. Schmidt-Kassow M., Kotz S.A. Attention and perceptual regularity in speech. NeuroReport 2009, 20:1643-1647.
45. Shannon R.V., Zeng F., Kamath V., Wygonski J., Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 1995, 270:303-304.
46. Shields J.L., McHugh A., Martin J.G. Reaction time to phoneme targets as a function of rhythmic cues in continuous speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1974, 102:250-255.
47. Squires K., Wickens C., Squires N.K., Donchin E. The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. Science 1976, 193:1142-1146.
48. Stahl B., Kotz S.A., Henseler I., Turner R., Geyer S. Rhythm in disguise: why singing may not hold the key to recovery from aphasia. Brain 2011, 134:3083-3093.
49. Thaut M.H. Neurologic music therapy in speech and language rehabilitation. Rhythm, music, and the brain: scientific foundations and clinical applications 2005, 165-178. Routledge, New York. M.H. Thaut (Ed.).
50. Thaut M.H., Kenyon G.P., Schauer M.L., McIntosh G.C. The connection between rhythmicity and brain function. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 1999, 18:101-108.
51. Thaut M., Peterson D., McIntosh G. Temporal entrainment of cognitive functions: musical mnemonics induce brain plasticity and oscillatory synchrony in neural networks underlying memory. The Neurosciences and Music II: From Perception to Performance 2005, 1060:243-254.
52. Trehub S.E. Musical predispositions in infancy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2001, 930:1-16.
53. Tueting P., Sutton S., Zubin J. Quantitative evoked potential correlates of the probability of events. Psychophysiology 1970, 7:385-394.
54. Verleger R., Jâkowski P., Wascher E. Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. Journal of Psychophysiology 2005, 19. 150-150.
55. Vuust P., Pallesen K.J., Bailey C., van Zuijen T.L., Gjedde A., Roepstorff A., et al. To musicians, the message is in the meter. Pre-attentive neuronal responses to incongruent rhythm are left-lateralized in musicians. NeuroImage 2005, 24:560-564.
56. Vuust P., Roepstorff A., Wallentin M., Mouridsen K., Østergaard L. It don't mean a thing ... :keeping the rhythm during polyrhythmic tension, activates language areas (BA47). Neuroimage 2006, 31:832-841.