Harnessing genomics for delineating conservation units

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 489-496

  Funk, W Chris ^a   McKay, John K ^a   Hohenlohe, Paul A ^b   Allendorf, Fred W ^c  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION GENETICS; DATA SET; DECISION MAKING; ENDANGERED SPECIES; GENE FLOW; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOMICS; NATURAL SELECTION; RARE SPECIES;

ADAPTATION; BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GENE FLOW; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOMICS; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GENETICS; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; GENE FLOW; GENETIC LOCI; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOMICS; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84865552514     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.012     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Rokas A., Abbot P. Harnessing genomics for evolutionary insights. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:192-200.
2. Rice A.M., et al. A guide to the genomics of ecological speciation in natural animal populations. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:9-18.
3. Stapley J., et al. Adaptation genomics: the next generation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25:705-712.
4. Elmer K.R., Meyer A. Adaptation in the age of ecological genomics: insights from parallelism and convergence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:298-306.
5. Thomas M.A., Klapper R. Genomics for the ecological toolbox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:439-445.
6. Kohn M.H., et al. Genomics and conservation genetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21:629-637.
7. Allendorf F.W., et al. Genomics and the future of conservation genetics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:697-709.
8. Frankham R. Challenges and opportunities of genetic approaches to biological conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143:1919-1927.
9. Allendorf F.W., Luikart G. Genetics and the Conservation of Populations 2007, Blackwell Publishing.
10. Fraser D.J., Bernatchez L. Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Mol. Ecol. 10 2001, 2741-2752.
11. Ryder O.A. Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1986, 1:9-10.
12. Moritz C. Defining evolutionarily significant units for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1994, 9:373-375.
13. Waples R.S. Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus spp., and the definition of 'species' under the Endangered Species Act. Mar. Fish. Rev. 1991, 53:11-22.
14. Crandall K.A., et al. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2000, 15:290-295.
15. Palsbøll P.J., et al. Identification of management units using population genetic data. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:11-16.
16. Hanski I.A., Gilpin M.E. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution 1997, Academic Press.
17. McKay J.K., Latta R.G. Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:285-291.
18. Holderegger R., et al. Adaptive vs. neutral genetic diversity: implications for landscape genetics. Landsc. Ecol. 2006, 21:797-807.
19. de Guia A.P.O., Saitoh T. The gap between the concept and definitions in the Evolutionarily Significant Unit: the need to integrate neutral genetic variation and adaptive variation. Ecol. Res. 2007, 22:604-612.
20. Moritz C. Conservation units and translocations: strategies for conserving evolutionary processes. Hereditas 1999, 130:217-228.
21. Frankham R., et al. Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conserv. Biol. 2011, 25:465-475.
22. Glenn T.C. Field guide to next-generation DNA sequencers. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11:759-769.
23. Hohenlohe P.A., et al. Next-generation RAD sequencing identifies thousands of SNPs for assessing hybridization between rainbow and westslope cutthroat trout. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11:117-122.
24. Rowe H.C., et al. RAD in the realm of next-generation sequencing technologies. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20:3499-3502.
25. Reznick D., Endler J.A. The impact of predation on life-history evolution in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 1982, 36:160-177.
26. Hohenlohe P.A., et al. Population genomics of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback using sequenced RAD tags. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000862.
27. Li W.H. Maintenance of genetic variability under joint effect of mutation, selection and random drift. Genetics 1978, 90:349-382.
28. Haldane J.B.S. A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. VI. Isolation. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1930, 26:220-230.
29. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 1931, 16:97-159.
30. Slatkin M. Gene flow in natural populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1985, 16:393-430.
31. Pritchard J.K., et al. The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:R208-R215.
32. Goss E.M., Bergelson J. Variation in resistance and virulence in the interaction between Arabidopsis thaliana and a bacterial pathogen. Evolution 2006, 60:1562-1573.
33. Sambatti J.B.M., Rice K.J. Local adaptation, patterns of selection, and gene flow in the Californian serpentine sunflower (Helianthus exilis). Evolution 2006, 60:696-710.
34. Luikart G., et al. The power and promise of population genomics: from genotyping to genome typing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 4:981-994.
35. Prunier J., et al. Scanning the genome for gene SNPs related to climate adaptation and estimating selection at the molecular level in boreal black spruce. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20:1702-1716.
36. Bonin A., et al. Population adaptive index: a new method to help measure intraspecific genetic diversity and prioritize populations for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21:697-708.
37. Salemi M., Vandamme A.-M. The Phylogenetic Handbook: A Practical Approach to DNA and Protein Phylogeny 2003, Cambridge University Press.
38. Pritchard J.K., et al. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000, 155:945-959.
39. Guillot G., et al. GENELAND: a computer package for landscape genetics. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2005, 5:712-715.
40. Joost S., et al. A spatial analysis method (SAM) to detect candidate loci for selection: towards a landscape genomics approach to adaptation. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:3955-3969.
41. Joost S., et al. Spatial analysis method (SAM): a software tool combining molecular and environmental data to identify candidate loci for selection. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2008, 8:957-960.
42. Schwartz M.K., et al. Landscape genomics: a brief perspective. Spatial Complexity, Informatics, and Wildlife Conservation 2009, 165-174. Springer. S.A. Cushman, F. Huettmann (Eds.).
43. Manel S., et al. Perspectives on the use of landscape genetics to detect genetic adaptive variation in the field. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:3760-3772.
44. Manel S., et al. Common factors drive adaptive genetic variation at different spatial scales in Arabis alpina. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:3824-3835.
45. ST outlier tests for SNP loci under selection. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11:184-194.
46. Rockman M.V. The QTN program and the alleles that matter for evolution: all that's gold does not glitter. Evolution 2012, 66:1-17.
47. Hohenlohe P.A., et al. Using population genomics to detect selection in natural populations: key concepts and methodological considerations. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2010, 171:1059-1071.
48. Beaumont M.A., Balding D.J. Identifying adaptive genetic divergence among populations from genome scans. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13:969-980.
49. Storz J.F. Using genome scans of DNA polymorphism to infer adaptive population divergence. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14:671-688.
50. Bonin A. Population genomics: a new generation of genome scans to bridge the gap with functional genomics. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:3583-3584.
51. Foll M., Gaggiotti O. A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective. Genetics 2008, 180:977-993.
52. Gaggiotti O.E., Foll M. Quantifying population structure using the F-model. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 10:821-830.
53. Edmands S. Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:463-475.
54. McKay J.K., et al. 'How local is local?' A review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2005, 13:432-440.
55. Coop G., et al. The role of geography in human adaptation. PLoS Genet. 2009, 6:e1000500.
56. Willing E.-M., et al. Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms reveal population history and adaptive divergence in wild guppies. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:968-984.
57. Hancock A.M., et al. Adaptation to climate across the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Science 2011, 334:83-86.
58. Namroud M.-C., et al. Scanning the genome for gene single nucleotide polymorphisms involved in adaptive population differentiation in white spruce. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:3599-3613.
59. Waples R.S., Gaggiotti O. What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15:1419-1439.
60. Drummond A.J., Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:214.
61. Dizon A.E., et al. Rethinking the stock concept - a phylogeographic approach. Conserv. Biol. 1992, 6:24-36.
62. Avise J.C. Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution 1994, Chapman & Hall.
63. Vogler A.P., Desalle R. Diagnosing units of conservation management. Conserv. Biol. 1994, 8:354-363.
64. USFWS (U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service) and NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) Policy regarding the recognition of distinct vertebrate population segments under the Endangered Species Act. Fed. Regist. 1996, 61:4721-4725.
65. Wilding C.S., et al. Differential gene exchange between parapatric morphs of Littorina saxatilis detected using AFLP markers. J. Evol. Biol. 2001, 14:611-619.
66. Cresko W.A., et al. Parallel genetic basis for repeated evolution of armor loss in Alaskan threespine stickleback populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:6050-6055.
67. Goudet J., et al. Testing differentiation in diploid populations. Genetics 1996, 144:1933-1940.
68. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 1995, 57:289-300.
69. Kalinowski S.T. How well do evolutionary trees describe genetic relationships between populations?. Heredity 2009, 102:506-513.
70. Black W.C., et al. Population genomics: genome-wide sampling of insect populations. Annu. Rev. Entom. 2001, 46:441-469.
71. Morin P.A., et al. SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:208-216.