Detrital magnetizations from redeposition experiments of different natural sediments

Earth and Planetary Science Letters

Volumn 351-352, Issue , 2012, Pages 147-157

  Spassov, Simo ^a   Valet, Jean Pierre ^b  

^a ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF BELGIUM   (Belgium)

^b INSTITUT DE PHYSIQUE DU GLOBE DE PARIS   (France)

Author keywords

Deep sea sediments; Detrital remanent magnetization; Floc formation; Paleointensity; Rock magnetism; Salinity

Indexed keywords

DEEP SEA SEDIMENT; FLOC FORMATION; PALEOINTENSITY; REMANENT MAGNETIZATION; ROCK MAGNETISM; SALINITY;

ALIGNMENT; CARBONATION; CLAY MINERALS; EXPERIMENTS; LITHOLOGY; MAGNETIC MOMENTS; SATURATION MAGNETIZATION; SEDIMENTOLOGY; STRATIGRAPHY; SUBMARINE GEOLOGY; SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS); TUBES (COMPONENTS);

SEDIMENTS;

CARBONATE SEDIMENT; CLAY; DEEP-SEA SEDIMENT; DEPOSITION; DEPOSITIONAL SEQUENCE; DETRITAL DEPOSIT; MAGNETIZATION; REMANENT MAGNETIZATION; SALINITY; SATURATION; STRATIGRAPHY; SUSPENDED SEDIMENT;

EID: 84865526163     PISSN: 0012821X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.07.016     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Burov B., Nurgaliev D.K., Jasonov P.G. Paleomagnetic Analysis 1986, Kazan University Press, in Russian.
2. Carter-Stiglitz B., Valet J.-P., LeGoff M. Constraints on the acquisition of remanent magnetization in fine grained sediments imposed by redeposition experiments. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2006, 245:427-437.
3. Cisowski S. Interacting vs. non-interacting single-domain behavior in natural and synthetic samples. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 1981, 26:77-83.
4. Day R., Fuller M., Schmidt V.A. Hysteresis properties of titanomagnetics: grain-size and compositional dependence. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 1977, 13:206-267.
5. c) 1. Theoretical curves and tests using titanomagnetite data. J. Geophys. Res. 2002, 107:2056. doi:0.1029/2001JB000486.
6. Fabian K., von Dobeneck T. Isothermal magnetization of samples with stable Preisach function: a survey of hysteresis, remanence and rock magnetic parameters. J. Geophys. Res. 1997, 201:17659-17677.
7. Fisher R.A. Dispersion on a sphere. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1953, 217:295-305.
8. Heslop D. Are hydrodynamic shape effects important when modelling the formation of depositional remanent magnetization?. Geophys. J. Int. 2007, 171:1029-1035. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03588.x.
9. Jasonov P.G., Nourgaliev D.K., Burov B.V., Heller F. A modernized coercivity spectrometer. Geol. Carpathica 1998, 49:224-225.
10. King R. The remanent magnetism of artificially deposited sediments. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1955, (Geophysical Suppl. 7):115-134.
11. Levi S., Banerjee S.K. On the possibility of obtaining relative paleointensities from lake sediments. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1976, 29:219-226.
12. Lu R., Banerjee S.K., Marvin J.A. Effects of clay mineralogy and the electrical conductivity of water on the acquisition of depositional remanent magnetization in sediments. J. Geophys. Res. 1990, 95:4531-4538.
13. Meynadier L., Valet J.-P., Weeks R., Shackleton N., Hagee V.L. Relative paleointensities of the geomagnetic field during the last fourteen hundred thousand years. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1992, 114:39-57.
14. Meynadier L., Valet J.-P., Grousset F. Magnetic properties and origin of late quaternary sediments in the Somali basin (Indian Ocean). Paleoceanography 1995, 10:459-472.
15. Mitra R., Tauxe L. Full vector model for magnetization in sediments. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2009, 286:535-545.
16. Mullins C.E., Tite M.S. Magnetic viscosity, quadrature susceptibility, and frequency dependence of susceptibility in single-domain assemblies of magnetite and maghemite. J. Geophys. Res. 1973, 78:804-809.
17. Nagata T. Rock Magnetism 1961, Maruzen, Tokyo. second ed.
18. Shcherbakov V.P., Shcherbakova V.V. On the theory of depositional remanent magnetization in sedimentary rocks. Geophys. Surv. 1982, (5):369-380.
19. Shcherbakov V.P., Sycheva N.K. Flocculation mechanism of the acquisition of remanent magnetization by sedimentary rocks. Izv. Phys. Solid Earth 2008, 44:804-815.
20. Shcherbakov V.P., Sycheva N.K. Numerical modeling of magnetization of a precipitating rock suspension. Izv. Phys. Solid Earth 2009, 45:47-56.
21. Tauxe L., Kent D.V. Properties of a detrital remanence carried by hematite from a study of modern river deposits and laboratory redeposition experiments. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 1984, 77:543-561.
22. Tauxe L., Steindorf J.L., Harris A. Depositional remanent magnetization: toward an improved theoretical and experimental foundation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2006, 244:515-529.
23. Van Vreumingen M.J. The magnetization intensity of some artificial suspensions while flocculating in a magnetic field. Geophys. J. Int. 1993, 114:601-606.
24. Van Vreumingen M.J. The influence of salinity and flocculation upon the acquisition of remanent magnetization in some artificial sediments. Geophys. J. Int. 1993, 114:607-614.
25. Valet J.-P., Meynadier L. Geomagnetic field intensity and reversals during the last four million years. Nature 1993, 366:234-238.
26. Valet J.-P., Meynadier L., Bassinot F., Garnier F. Relative paleointensity across the last geomagnetic reversal from sediments of the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific oceans. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1994, 21:485-488.
27. Verosub K.L. Depositional and post-depositional processes in the magnetization of sediments. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 1977, 15:129-143.
28. Wulansari R., Mitchell J., Blanshard J., Paterson J. Why are gelatin solutions Newtonian?. Food Hydrocolloids 1998, 12:245-249.
29. Zhao X., Roberts A.P. How does the Chinese loess become magnetized?. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2010, 292:112-122.