Quantifying the effect of using Kanban versus scrum: A case study

IEEE Software

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 47-53

  Sjøberg, Dag I K ^a   Johnsen, Anders ^b   Solberg, Jørgen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b Software Innovation ^*  (Norway)

Author keywords

lean; management; measurement; process metrics; productivity; software engineering; software engineering process; software process models

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION DOMAINS; EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION; LEAN; LEAN METHODS; PROCESS METRICS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING PROCESS; SOFTWARE PROCESS MODELS; WORK ITEMS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MANAGEMENT; MEASUREMENTS; PRODUCTIVITY;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84865517147     PISSN: 07407459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/MS.2012.110     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. T. Dybå and T. Dingsøyr, "Empirical Studies of Agile Software Development: A Systematic Review", Information & Software Tech., vol. 50, nos. 9-10, 2008, pp. 833-859.
2. J. E. Hannay et al., "The Effectiveness of Pair-Programming: A Meta-Analysis", Information and Software Tech., vol. 55, no. 7, 2008, pp. 1110-1122.
3. C. Ebert and R. Dumke, Software Measurement, Springer, 2007.
4. D. Anderson, Kanban: Successful Evolutionary Change for Your Technology Business, Blue Hole Press, 2010.
5. H. Kniberg and M. Skarin, Kanban and Scrum: Making the Most of Both, InfoQ, 2009.
6. D. I. K. Sjøberg et al., "Quantifying the Effect of Code Smells on Maintenance Effort", IFI Research Report 417, University of Oslo (ISBN 82-7368-381-8), 2012.
7. R. Chillarege et al., "Orthogonal Defect Classification-A Concept for In-Process Measurement", IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol. 18, no. 11, 1992, pp. 943-956. (Pubitemid 23608410)
8. T. K. Abdel-Hamid and S. E. Madnick, Software Project Dynamics: An Integrated Approach, Prentice Hall, 1991.