Clinical trial evaluating an online cognitive dysfunction evaluation system for stroke patients

Journal of Physical Therapy Science

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 503-507

  Lee, In Hee ^a   Park, Sang Young ^b   Son, Chang Sik ^a   Kim, Yoon Nyun ^a  

^a Keimyung University   (South Korea)

^b Daegu University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Cognitive dysfunction; Online examination system; Stroke

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865493189     PISSN: 09155287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1589/jpts.24.503     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Neisser U: Cognition and Reality, San Fransisco: W.H. Freeman, 1976.
2. Prigatano GP, Fordyce DJ: Cognitive dysfunction and psychological adjustment after brain I jury, In: GP Prignatano, ed. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation after Brain Injury. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.
3. Allard G, Butler J, Faust D, et al.: Errors in hand scoring objective personality tests: The case of the Personality Diagnostic Questinaire- Reivsed(PDQ-R). Prof Psychol Res Pr, 1995, 26: 304-308. [CrossRef]
4. Moon GW, Blakey WA, Gosuch RL, et al.: Frequent WAIS-R administration errors: An ignored sources of inaccurate measurement. Prof Psychol Res Pr, 1991, 22: 256-258. [CrossRef]
5. Collingwood LM, Harrel EH: Performance of psychotic and substance abuse patients with or without head injury on the Halstead-reitan battery. Appl Neuropsychol, 1999, 6: 88-95. [Medline] [CrossRef]
6. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res, 1975, 12: 189-198. [Medline] [CrossRef]
7. Morris RG, Evenden JL, Sahakian BJ, et al.: Computer-aided assessment of dementia: Comparative studies of neuropsychological deficits in Alzheimer-type dementia and Parkinson's disease. In: Stahl SM, Iversen SD, Goodman EC(Eds.), Cognitive neurochemistry Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986, pp 21-36.
8. Devivo K, Rothland J, Price L, et al.: Computerized assessment of arithmetic computation skills with MicroCog. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 1997, 3: 199-200. [Medline]
9. Golden CJ, Hammeke TA, Prish AD: Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery: A Manual for clinical and experimental Uses. Los Angeles: University of Nebraska Press, 1980.
10. David W: Wechsler memory scale-revised manual, 1st ed, San Antonio: Hacourt Brace Jovanovich, 1987.
11. Regan EC, Price KR: The frequency occurrence and severity of side-effects of immersion virtual reality. Aviat Space Environ Med, 1994, 65: 527-530. [Medline]
12. Lauren P, Jorgensen T: Computerized neuropsychological test system: In Neurobehavioral Method in Occupational and Environmental health. WHO Environmental Health Document 3, Cophenhagen, 1985.
13. Nell V: Cross-Cultural Neuropsychological Assessment: Theory and Practice. New Jersy: Lawrence Erbaum Associates, 1999.
14. Paul RH, Lawrence J, Williams LM, et al.: Preliminary validity of "Integ- Neuro": a new computerized battery of neurocognitive tests. Int J Neurosci, 2005, 115: 1549-1567. [Medline] [CrossRef]
15. Kwon YC, Park JH: Korean version of mini-mental state examination(MMSE-K). J Korean Neurol Assoc, 1989, 1: 123-135.
16. Zec RF: Neuropsychological functioning in Alzheimer's disease. In: Parks RW, Zec RW, Wilson RS: Neuropsychology of Alzheimer's disease and other dementia. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993, pp 3-80.
17. Maddocks D, Sailing M: Neuropsychological deficits following concussion. Brain Inj, 1996, 10: 99-104. [Medline] [CrossRef]
18. Birnbaum MH: Human research and data collection via the internet. Annu Rev Psychol, 2004, 55: 803-832. [Medline] [CrossRef]
19. Kraut R, Olson J, Banaji M, et al.: Psychological Research Online. Am Psychol, 2004, 59: 105-117. [Medline] [CrossRef]
20. Silverstein SM, Berten S, Olson P, et al.: Development and validation of a world-wide-web-based neurocognitive assessment battery: webneuro. Behav Res Methods, 2007, 39: 940-949. [Medline] [CrossRef]
21. Naglieri JA, Drasgow F, Schmit M, et al.: Psychological testing on the internet: new problems, old issues. Am Psychol, 2004, 59: 150-162. [Medline] [CrossRef]
22. Luce KH, Winzelberg AJ, Das S, et al.: Reliability of self-report: Paper versus online administration. Comput Human Behav, 2007, 23: 1384-1389. [CrossRef]