Management and removal of heavy metals from contaminated soil

Heavy Metals in the Environment

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 381-430

  Shammas, Nazih K ^a  

^a Krofta Engineering Corp   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865471783     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (106)

1. Federal Register, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). 42 U.S.C. s/s 9601 et seq. (1980), United States Government, Public Laws. Available at: www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/title42/chapter103_.html, January 2004.
2. U.S. EPA, RecentDevelopments for In Situ Treatment of Metal Contaminated Soils. Contract # 68-W5-0055, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, March 1997.
3. Federal Register, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). 42 U.S, Codes/s 6901et seq. (1976), U.S. Government, Public Laws. Available at: www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/title42/chapter82_.html, January 2004.
4. U.S. EPA, Contaminantsand Remedial Options at Selected Metal-Contaminated Sites. EPA/540/R-95/512, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, July 1995.
5. U.S. EPA, TechnologyAlternatives for the Remediation of Soils Contaminated with AS, Cd, Cr, Hg, and Pb. EPA/540/S-97/500, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, August 1997.
6. U.S. EPA, InSitu Technologies for the Remediation of Soils Contaminated with Metals—Status Report. U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, July 1996.
7. U.S. EPA, Selectionof Control Technologies for Remediation of Lead Battery Recycling Sites. EPA/540/2-91/014, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, 1991.
8. U.S. EPA, EngineeringBulletin: Selection of Control Technologies for Remediation of Lead Battery Recycling Site. EPA/540/S-92/011, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, 1992.
9. U.S. EPA, Contaminantsand Remedial Options at Wood Preserving Sites. EPA 600/R-92/182, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, 1992.
10. U.S. EPA, PresumptiveRemedies for Soils, Sediments, and Sludges at Wood Treater Sites. EPA/540/R-95/128, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, 1995.
11. U.S. EPA, Contaminantsand Remedial Options at Pesticide Sites. EPA/600/R-94/202, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, 1994.
12. U.S. EPA. Separation/Concentration Technology Alternatives for the Remediation of Pesticide-Contaminated Soil. EPA/540/S-97/503, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, 1997.
13. McLean, J.E. and Bledsoe, B.E, Behaviorof Metals in Soils. EPA/540/S-92/018, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, 1992.
14. Palmer, C.D. and Puls, R.W, NaturalAttenuation of Hexavalent Chromium in Ground Water and Soils. EPA/540/S-94/505, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, 1994.
15. Benjamin, M.M. and Leckie, J.D, Adsorptionof metals at oxide interfaces: Effects of the concentrations of adsorbate and competing metals. In: Baker R.A. (Ed.), Contaminant sand Sediments, Chapter 16. Volume 2: Analysis, Chemistry, Biology. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, 1980.
16. Wagemann, R, Sometheoretical aspects of stability and solubility of inorganic As in the freshwater environment. Water Res., 12, 139-145, 1978.
17. Zimmerman, L. and Coles, C, Cementindustry solutions to waste management—the utilization of processed waste by-products for cement manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference for Cement Industry Solutions to Waste Management, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, pp. 533-545, 1992.
18. Earth Platform. Contaminated Soil Remediation. Available at: http://www.earthplatform.com/contaminated/soil/remediation, 2007.
19. Sharma, H.D. and Reddy, K.R, GeoenvironmentalEngineering: Site Remediation, Waste Containment, and Emerging Waste Management Technologies. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2004.
20. Weston, R.F, InstallationRestoration General Environmental Technology Development Guidelines for In-Place Closure of Dry Lagoons. U.S, ArmyToxic and Hazardous Materials, May 1985.
21. U.S. EPA, SlurryTrench Construction for Pollution Migration Control. EPA/540/2-84/001, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, February 1984.
22. U.S. EPA, GroutingTechniques in Bottom Sealing of Hazardous Waste Sites. EPA/600/2-86/020, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, 1986.
23. U.S. EPA, EngineeringBulletin: Landfill Covers. EPA/540/S-93/500, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, February 1993.
24. FRTR, PhysicalBarriers. Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide. Available at: http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4-53.html, 2007.
25. U.S. EPA, EngineeringBulletin: Slurry Walls. EPA/540/S92/008, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, October 1992.
26. U.S. EPA. Solidification/Stabilization Use at Superfund Sites. EPA-542-R-00-010, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, September 2000.
27. U.S. EPA, TechnicalResource Document: Solidification/Stabilization and Its Application to Waste Materials. EPA/530/R-93/012, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, June 1993.
28. U.S. EPA, EngineeringBulletin: Solidification/Stabilization of Organics and Inorganics. EPA/540/S-92/015, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, 1992.
29. Conner, J.R, ChemicalFixation and Solidification of Hazardous Wastes. VanNostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, 1990.
30. U.S. EPA. Solidification/Stabilization and Its Application to Waste Materials. EPA/530/R-93/012, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, June 1993.
31. Anderson, W.C. (Ed.), Innovative Site Remediation Technology: Solidification/Stabilization, Volume 4, Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, VA, 1994.
32. WASTECH, American Academy of Environmental Engineers (EPA printed under license no. EPA/542-B-94-001). June 1994.
33. U.S. EPA. A Citizen’s Guide to Solidification/Stabilization. EPA 542-F-01-024, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, December 2001.
34. U.S. EPA. Solidification/Stabilization Use at Superfund Sites. EPA-542-R-00-010, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, September 2000.
35. U.S. ACE. Solidification/Stabilization of Contaminated Material, Unified Facility Guide Specification. UFGS-02160a, U.S, ArmyCorps of Engineers. October 2000.
36. ANL, FactSheet—Solidification/Stabilization. Drilling Waste Management Information System, Argonne National Laboratory. Available at: http://web.ead.anl.gov/dwm/techdesc/solid/index.cfm, 2007.
37. U.S. EPA, Handbookon In Situ Treatment of Hazardous Waste-Contaminated Soils. EPA/540/2-90/002, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, 1990.
38. Arniella, E.F. and Blythe, L.J, Solidifyingtraps hazardous waste. Chem. Eng., 97(2), 92-102, 1990.
39. Kalb, P.D., Burns, H.H., and Meyer, M. Thermo-plastic encapsulation treatability study for a mixed waste incinerator off-gas scrubbing solution. In: Gilliam, T.M. (Ed.), Third International Symposium on Stabilization/Solidification of Hazardous, Radioactive, and Mixed Wastes, ASTM STP 1240. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1993.
40. Ponder, T.G. and Schmitt, D, Fieldassessment of air emission from hazardous waste stabilization operation. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Hazardous Waste Research Symposium, EPA/600/9-91/002, Cincinnati, OH, 1991.
41. Shukla, S.S., Shukla, A.S., and Lee, K.C. Solidification/stabilization study for the disposal of pentachlorophenol. J. Hazard. Mater., 30, 317-331, 1992.
42. U.S. EPA, Evaluationof Solidification/Stabilization as a Best Demonstrated Available Technology for Contaminated Soils. EPA/600/2-89/013, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, 1989.
43. Weitzman, L. and Hamel, L.E, Volatileemissions from stabilized waste. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Research Symposium, EPA/600/9-90/006, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, 1990.
44. Means, J.L., Nehring, K.W., and Heath, J.C, Abrasiveblast material utilization in asphalt roadbed material. In: Third International Symposium on Stabilization/Solidification of Hazardous, Radioactive, and Mixed Wastes. ASTM STP 1240, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1993.
45. U.S. ACE, Yearlyaverage cost index for utilities. In: Civil Works Construction Cost Index System Manual, 110-2-1304, U.S, ArmyCorps of Engineers, Washington, DC, p. 44. PDF file is available on the Internet at: http://www.nww.usace.army.mil/cost, 2007.
46. Buelt, J.L., Timmerman, C.L., Oma, K.H., FitzPatrick, V.F., and Carter J.G, InSitu Vitrification of Transuranic Waste: An Updated Systems Evaluation and Applications Assessment, PNL-4800, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, 1987.
47. U.S. EPA, VitrificationTechnologies for Treatment of Hazardous and Radioactive Waste. EPA/625/R-92/002, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, May 1992.
48. U.S. EPA, EngineeringBulletin: In Situ Vitrification Treatment. EPA/540/S-94/504, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, October 1994.
49. U.S. EPA, EngineeringBulletin: In Situ Vitrification Treatment. EPA/540/S-94/504, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, May 2002 (Revised).
50. FRTR. Solidification/Stabilization—In Situ Soil Remediation Technology. Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide. Available at: http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4-8.html, 2007.
51. U.S. EPA, GeosafeCorporation In Situ Vitrification Innovative Technology Evaluation Report. EPA/540/R-94/520, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, March 1995.
52. FitzPatrick, V.F., Timmerman, C.L., and Buelt, J.L, Insitu vitrification: An innovative thermal treatment technology. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on New Frontiers for Hazardous Waste Management, 305-322, 1987. EPA/600/9-87/018F. U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, EPA printed under license No. EPA/542-B-94-001, June 1994.
53. Timmerman, C.L, InSitu Vitrification of PCB Contaminated Soils. EPRI CS-4839, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, 1986.
54. U.S. EPA, The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program: Technology Profiles, 4th Edition, EPA/540/5-91/008, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, 1991.
55. Luey, J., Koegler, S.S., Kuhn, W.L., Lowery, P.S., and Winkelman, R.G, InSitu Vitrification of a Mixed-Waste Contaminated Soil Site. The 116-B-6A Crib at Hanford, PNL-8281. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, 1992.
56. Hansen, J.E. and FitzPatrick, V.F, InSitu Vitrification Applications. Geosafe Corporation, Richland, WA, 1991.
57. U.S. EPA, EngineeringBulletin: Soil Washing Treatment. EPA/540/2-90/017, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, 1996.
58. U.S. EPA. A Citizen’s Guide to Soil Washing. EPA 542-F-01-008, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, May 2001.
59. William, C.A. (Ed.). Innovative Site Remediation Technology: Soil Washing/Flushing, Vol. 3. American Academy of Environmental Engineers (published by EPA under EPA 542-B-93-012), November 1993.
60. U.S. EPA, TechnologyFocus—Soil Washing. Technology Innovation Program, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, Availableat: http://clu-in.org/techfocus/default.focus/sec/Soil_Washing/cat/Overview, 2007.
61. Ehsan, S., Prasher, S.O., and Marshall, W.D. A washing procedure to mobilize mixed contaminants from soil. II, Heavymetals. J. Environ. Qual., 35, 2084-2091, 2006.
62. Fischer, K. and Bipp, H.P, Removalof heavy metals from soil components and soils by natural chelating agents. Part II, Soilextraction by sugar acids. Water, Air, and Soil Pollut., 38(1-4), 271-288, 2002.
63. U.S. EPA. Citizen’s Guide to Soil Washing. EPA/542/F-92/003, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, March 1992.
64. U.S. EPA, EngineeringBulletin: In Situ Soil Flushing. EPA/540/2-91/021, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, October 1991.
65. FRTR, SoilFlushing—In Situ Soil Remediation Technology. Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide. Available at: http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4-6.html, 2007.
66. CPEO, SoilFlushing. Center for Public Environmental Oversight (CPEO). San Francisco, CA http:// www.cpeo.org/techtree/ttdescript/soilflus.htm, 2007.
67. U.S. EPA, SuperfundInnovative Technology Evaluation Program: Technology Profiles, 7th Edition, EPA/540/R-94/526, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, November 1994.
68. Pamukcu, S. and Wittle, J.K, Electrokineticremoval of selected metals from soil. Environ. Progr. 2, 3, 241-250, 1992.
69. Acar, Y.B, Electrokineticcleanups. Civil Eng., 62, 58-60, 1992.
70. Mattson, E.D. and Lindgren, E.R. Electrokinetics: An innovative technology for in situ remediation of metals. In: Proceedings, National Groundwater Association, Outdoor Acnon Conference. Minneapolis, MN, May 1994.
71. Acar, Y.B. and Gale, R.J, Electrokineticremediation: Basics and technology status. J. Hazard. Mater., 40, 117-137, 1995.
72. Will, F, Removingtoxic substances from the soil using electrochemistry. Chem. and Ind., 15, 376-379, 1995.
73. Rodsand, T. and Acar, Y.B, Electrokineticextraction of lead from spiked Norwegian marine clay. Geoenvironment 2000, 2, 1518-1534, 1995.
74. Lindgren, E.R., Kozak, M.W., and Mattson, E.D, Electrokineticremediation of contaminated soils: An update. Waste Management 92. Tuscon, Arizona, p. 1309, 1992.
75. Jacobs, R.A. and Sengun, M.Z, Modelof experiences on soil remediation by electric fields. J. Environ. Sci. Health, 29A, 9, 1994.
76. Acar, Y.B. and Gale, R.J, ElectrochemicalDecontamination of Soils and Slurries. U.S, PatentNo.: 5,137,608. Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Washington, DC, August15, 1992.
77. Marks, R., Acar, Y.B., and Gale, R.J, InSitu Bioelectrokinetic Remediation of Contaminated Soils Containing Hazardous Mixed Wastes. U.S, PatentNo. 5,458, 747. Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Washington, DC, October 17, 1995.
78. Acar, Y.B. and Alshawabkeh, A.N, Electrokineticremediation: I. pilot-scale tests with lead spiked kaolinite, II. theoretical model. J. Geotechn. Eng., 122(3), 173-196, March 1996.
79. W. Pool. Process for the Electroreclamation of Soil Material. Patent No. 5,433,829, U.S, PatentOffice. July 18, 1995.
80. U.S. EPA, InSitu Remediation Technology Status Report: Electrokinetics. EPA 542-K-94-007, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, 1995.
81. Editor. Innovative in situ cleanup processes. The Hazardous Waste Consultant, September/October, 1992.
82. DOE, Developmentof an Integrated In-Situ Remediation Technology. Technology Development Data Sheet, DE-AR21-94MC 31185. U.S, Departmentof Energy, 1995.
83. U.S. EPA, SuperfundInnovative Technology Evaluation Program Technology Profiles, 7th Edition, EPA 540-R-94-526, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, 1994.
84. U.S. EPA Lasagna™ Public-Private Partnership. EPA 542-F-96-010A, U.S, EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Washington, DC, 1996.
85. Szpyrkowicz, L., Radaelli, M., Bertini, S., Daniele, S., and Casarin, F, Simultaneousremoval of metals and organic compounds from a heavily polluted soil. Electrochim. Acta, 52(10), 3386-3392, 2007.
86. CPEO. Electrokinetics. Center for Public Environmental Oversight (CPEO). San Francisco, CA, Availableat: http://www.cpeo.org/techtree/ttdescript/elctro.htm, 2007.
87. Cunningham, S.D. and Berti, W.R, Remediationof contaminated soils with green plants: An overview. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. (Tissue Culture Association), 29, 207-212, 1993.
88. Raskin, I, Bioconcentrationof metals by plants. Environ. Biotechnol., 5, 285-290, 1994.
89. Goldsbrough, P, Phytochelatinsand metallothioneins: Complementary mechanisms for metal tolerance. In: Fourteenth Annual Symposium 1995 in Current Topics in Plant Biochemistry, Physiology and Molecular Biology, 1995.
90. Salt, D.E. Phytoremediation: A novel strategy for the removal of toxic metals from the environment using plants. Biotechnology, 13, 468-474, 1995.
91. Kumar, P.B.A. Phytoextraction: The use of plants to remove metals from soils. Environmen. Sci. Technol., 29, 1232-1238, 1995.
92. Durham, S, UsingPlants to Clean Up Soil. U.S, Departmentof Agriculture (USDA), http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr/2007/070123.htm. January 23, 2007.
93. Morel, I.L, Rootexudates and metal mobilization. In: Fourteenth Annual Symposium 1995 in Current Topics in Plant Biochemistry, Physiology and Molecular Biology, 1995.
94. Baker, A.J.M. and Brooks, R.R, Terrestrialhigher plants which hyperaccumulate metallic elements—a review of their distribution, ecology, and phytochemistry. Biorecovery, 1, 81-126, 1989.
95. Hyperaccumulation in the Genus Alyssum. In: Fourteenth Annual Symposium 1995 in Current Topics in Plant Biochemistry, Physiology and Molecular Biology, 1995.
96. Baker, A.J.M, Metalhyperaccumulation by plants: Our present knowledge of ecophysiological phenomenon. In: Fourteenth Annual Symposium 1995 in Current Topics in Plant Biochemistry, Physiology and Molecular Biology, 1995.
97. Greger, M. and Landberg, M.T, Improvingremoval of metals from soil by Salix. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Biogeochemistry of Trace Elements, Uppsala, Sweden, June 15-19, 2003.
98. Chaney, R.L., Malik, M., Li, Y.M., Brown, S.L., Angle, J.S., and Baker, A.J.M, Phytoremediationof soil metals. Current Opin. Biotechnol., 8, 279-284, 1997.
99. King Communications Group, Inc. Promise of heavy metal harvest lures venture funds. The Bioremediation Report, 4, 1, Washington, DC, January, 1995.
100. Ensley, B.D, Willplants have a role in bioremediation? In: Fourteenth Annual Symposium 1995 in Current Topics in Plant Biochemistry, Physiology and Molecular Biology, 1995.
101. Cunningham, S.D. and Lee, C.R. Phytoremediation: Plant-based remediation of contaminated soil and sediments. In: Proceedings of a Symposium of the Soil Science, Society of America, Chicago, IL, November, 1994.
102. DOE, SummaryReport of a Workshop on Phytoremediation Research Needs. U.S, Departmentof Energy, Santa Rosa, CA, July 24-26, 1994.
103. Baker, A.J.M., Brooks, R.R., and Reeves, R.D, Growingfor gold…and copper…and zinc. New Scientist, 1603, 44-48, 1989.
104. Parry, I, Plantsabsorb metals. Pollut. Eng., pp. 40-41, February, 1995.
105. USDA, AcidifyingSoil Helps Plant Remove Cadmium, Zinc Metals. Agricultural Research Service. Science Daily. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/06/050619192657.htm, 2007.
106. Hyman, M. and Dupont, R.R, Groundwaterand Soil Remediation: Process Design and Cost Estimating of Proven Technologies. ASCE Publications, Reston, VA, p. 534, 2001.