Comparison of CT, PET, and PET/CT for staging of patients with indolent non-hodgkin's lymphoma: Statistical errors in Fueger et al. (2009)

Molecular Imaging and Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 397-398

  White, Larry R ^a  

^a EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ACCURACY; CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; INDOLENT NONHODGKIN LYMPHOMA; LETTER; NONHODGKIN LYMPHOMA; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SYSTEMATIC ERROR;

FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; LYMPHOMA, NON-HODGKIN; MALE; NEOPLASM STAGING; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84865463455     PISSN: 15361632     EISSN: 18602002     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-011-0513-3     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Fueger BJ, Yeom K, Czernin J, Sayre JW, Phelps ME, Allen- Auerbach MS (2009) Comparison of CT, PET, and PET/CT for staging of patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Mol Imaging Biol 11(4):269-274
2. Beyer T, Czernin J, Freudenberg LS (2011) Variations in clinical PET/CT operations: results of an international survey of active PET/CT users. J Nucl Med 52(2):303-310
3. Graham MM, Badawi RD, Wahl RL (2011) Variations in PET/CT methodology for oncological imaging at U.S. academic medical centers: an imaging response assessment team survey. J Nucl Med 52(2):311-317