Growth, survival, and genetic variability of Austrian pine (Pinus nigra Arnold) seedlings in response to water deficit

New Forests

Volumn 43, Issue 5-6, 2012, Pages 791-804

  Mataruga, Milan ^a   Haase, Diane ^b   Isajev, Vasilije ^c   Orlović, Saša ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BANJA LUKA   (Bosnia and Herzegovina)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Austrian pine; Seedlings; Survival; Water deficit

Indexed keywords

AUSTRIAN PINE; CRUSHED STONES; DROUGHT STRESS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HABITAT CONDITIONS; HABITAT TYPE; HEIGHT GROWTH; INFLUENTIAL FACTORS; OPEN-POLLINATED FAMILIES; PINUS NIGRA ARNOLD; PLANT GROWTH; SEED QUALITY; SEEDLING VIGOR; SEEDLINGS; SURVIVAL; SURVIVAL AND GROWTH; SURVIVAL DATA; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT GROUP; WATER AVAILABILITY; WATER DEFICITS;

CLIMATE CHANGE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DROUGHT; ECOSYSTEMS; REFORESTATION;

POPULATION STATISTICS;

ADAPTATION; ARID REGION; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONIFEROUS FOREST; DROUGHT STRESS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENETIC VARIATION; GROWTH RATE; HABITAT TYPE; HEIGHT DETERMINATION; POLLINATION; PROVENANCE; REFORESTATION; SEED COLLECTION; SEEDLING ESTABLISHMENT; SURVIVAL; TERRAIN; TRANSPLANTATION; VIGOR; WATER AVAILABILITY;

BALKANS;

EID: 84865440474     PISSN: 01694286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11056-012-9351-7     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abrams MD (1988) Genetic variation in leaf morphology and plant and tissue water relations during drought in Cercis canadensis L. For Sci 34(1): 200-207.
2. Abrams MD, Kubiske ME, Steiner KC (1990) Drought adaptations and responses in five genotypes of Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh.: photosynthesis, water relations and leaf morphology. Tree Physiol 6: 305-315.
3. Bilan MV, Hogan CT, Carter HB (1977) Stomatal opening, transpiration and needle moisture in loblolly pine seedlings from two Texas sources. For Sci 23: 457-462.
4. Blake TJ, Yeatman CW (1989) Water relations, gas exchange and early growth rates of outcrossed and selfed Pinus banksiana families. Can J Bot 67: 1618-1623.
5. Borghetti M, Cinnirella S, Magnani F, Saracino A (1998) Impact of long term drought on xylem embolism and growth in Pinus halepensis. Trees Struct Funct 12: 187-195.
6. Burdett AN (1990) Physiological processes in plantation establishment and the development of specifications for forest planting stock. Can J For Res 20(4): 415-427.
7. Chen CW, Tsai WT, Gomez LE (1994) Modeling responses of ponderosa pine to interacting stresses of ozone and drought. For Sci 40(2): 267-288.
8. Choi SH (1992) Variation in water potential components among half-sib families of shortleaf pine (Pinuse chinata) in response to soil drought. Can J For Res 22(1): 111-116.
9. Costa P, Bahrman N, Frigerio JM, Kremer A, Plomion C (1998) Water-deficit responsive proteins in Maritime pine. Plant Mol Biol 39: 587-596.
10. Cregg BM (1994) Carbon allocation, gas exchange and needle morphology of Pinus ponderosa genotypes known to differ in growth and survival under imposed drought. Tree Physiol 14: 883-898.
11. Cregg BM (2004) Improving drought tolerance of trees: theoretical and practical considerations. In: Fernandes T, Davidson CG (eds) Proceedings of the XXVI IHC-Nursery Crops, Can Int Dev Agency, p 147.
12. Cregg BM, Zhang JW (2001) Physiology and morphology of Pinus sylvestris seed sources from diverse sources under cyclic drought stress. For Ecol Manag 154: 131-139.
13. Cregg BM, Olivas-García JM, Hennessey TC (2000) Provenance variation in carbon isotope discrimination of mature ponderosa pine trees at two locations in the Great Plains. Can J For Res 30: 428-439.
14. Dubos C, Plomion C (2001) Drought differentially affects expression of a PR-10 protein, in needles of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). J Exp Bot 358: 1143-1144.
15. Dubos C, Plomion C (2003) Identification of water-deficit responsive genes in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) roots. Plant Mol Biol 51(2): 249-262.
16. Dubos C, Le Provost G, Pot D, Salin F, Lalane C, Madur D, Frigerio J-M, Plomion C (2003) Identification and characterization of water-stress-responsive genes in hydroponically grown maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) seedlings. Tree Physiol 23(3): 169-179.
17. Džamić R, Stikić R, Nikolić M, Jovanović Z (1999) Fiziologija biljaka-praktikum. Naučna Knjiga. Poljoprivredni fakultet, Beograd, pp 24-138. (eng-Plant Physiology-Lab. Scientific Book. Faculty of Agriculture, Belgrade, pp 24-138).
18. Elfeel AA, Al-Namo ML (2011) Effect of imposed drought on seedling growth, water use efficiency and survival of three arid zone species (Acacia tortilis subsp raddiana, Salvadora persica and Leptadenia pyrotechnica). Agric Biol J N Am 2(3): 493-498.
19. Fan S, Grossnickle SC, Russell JH (2008) Morphological and physiological variation in western redcedar (Thuja plicata) populations under contrasting soil water conditions. Trees Struct Funct 22: 671-683.
20. Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA (2009) Plant drought stress: effects, mechanism and management. Agron Sustain Dev 29: 185-212.
21. Fernández M, Gil L, Pardos J (1999) Response of Pinus pinaster Ait. provenances at early age to water supply. I. Water relation parameters. Ann For Sci 56(2): 179-187.
22. Garau AM, Lemcoff JH, Ghersa CM, Beadle CL (2008) Water stress tolerance in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. subsp. Maidenii (G. Muell.) saplings induced by water restrictions imposed by weeds. For Ecol Manag 255: 2811-2819.
23. Gibelin AL, Déqué M (2003) Anthropogenic climate change over the Mediterranean region simulated by a global variable resolution model. Clim Dynam 20: 327-339.
24. Grossnickle SC, Russell JH (2010) Physiological variation among western redcedar (Thuja plicata Donn ex D. Don) populations in response to short-term drought. Ann For Sci 67: 506-516.
25. Grossnickle SC, Fan S, Russell JH (2005) Variation in gas exchange and water use efficiency patterns among populations of western redcedar. Trees Struct Funct 19: 32-42.
26. Guehl JM, Clement A, Kaushal P, Aussenac G (1993) Planting stress, water status and non-structural carbohydrate concentrations in Corsican pine seedlings. Tree Physiol 12: 173-183.
27. He C, Zhang J, Duan A, Zheng S, Sun H, Fu L (2008) Proteins responding to drought and high-temperature stress in Populus × euramericana cv. '74/76'. Trees Struct Funct 22(6): 803-813.
28. Heth D, Kramer PJ (1975) Drought tolerance of pine seedlings under various climatic conditions. For Sci 21: 72-82.
29. IPCC (2007) Climate change, fourth assessment report. Cambridge University Press, London.
30. Irvine J, Perks MP, Magnani F, Grace J (1998) The response of Pinus sylvestris to drought: stomatal control of transpiration and hydraulic conductance. Tree Physiol 18: 393-402.
31. Johnson D, McCulloh K, Reinhardt K (2011) The earliest stages of tree growth: development, physiology and impacts of microclimate. Tree Physiol 4(2): 65-87.
32. Jones MM, Turner NC, Osmond CB (1981) Mechanisms of drought resistance. In: Paleg LG, Aspinall D (eds) Physiology and biochemistry of drought resistance in plants. Academic Press, Sydney, p 15.
33. Margolis HA, Brand DG (1990) An ecophysiological basis for understanding plantation establishment. Can J For Res 20(4): 375-390.
34. Martin-Benito D, Kint V, del Rio M, Muys B, Canellas I (2011) Growth responses of West-Mediterranean Pinus nigra to climate change are modulated by competition and productivity: past trends and future perspectives. Forest Ecol Manag 262: 1030-1040.
35. Mataruga M (2006) Austrian pine growing on the rocks-its variability and various possibilities of its use. University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka.
36. Mataruga M, Haase D, Isajev V (2010) Dynamics of seed imbibition and germination of Austrian pine (Pinus nigra Arnold) from extreme habitat conditions within five Balkan provenances. New For 40: 229-242.
37. Olivas-García JM, Cregg BM, Hennessey TC (2000) Genotypic variation in carbon isotope discrimination and gas exchange of ponderosa pine seedlings under two levels of water stress. Can J For Res 30: 1581-1590.
38. Otorepec S (1991) Agrometeorologija, Naučna knjiga Beograd, pp 222. (eng-Agrometeorology, Scientific book, Belgrade, pp 222).
39. Pausas JG, Bladé C, Valdecantos A, Seva JP, Fuentes D, Alloza JA, Vilagrosa A, Bautista S, Cortina J, Vallejo R (2004) Pines and oaks in the restoration of Mediterranean landscapes of Spain: new perspectives for an old practice-a review. Plant Ecol 171(1-2): 209-220.
40. Raev I, Rosnev B (2004) Drought impacts on managed forests. In: CG Knight, I Raev, MP Staneva (eds) Drought in Bulgaria: a contemporary analog for climate change. Printed by Ashgote studie in environmental policy and practice, pp 145-150.
41. Rao PB, Kaur A, Tewari A (2008) Drought resistance in seedlings of five important tree species in Tarai region of Uttarakhand. Trop Ecol 49(1): 43-52.
42. Šolaja M, Topalić LJ (1998) Praktikum za biologiju. Banja Luka. pp 13-17 (eng Practicum in Biology. Banja Luka, pp 13-17).
43. Teskey RO, Bongarten BC, Cregg BM, Dougherty PM, Hennessey TC (1987) Physiology and genetics of tree growth in response to moisture and temperature stress: an examination of the characteristics of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Physiol 3: 41-61.
44. Tognetti R, Michelozzi M, Giovannelli A (1997) Geographical variation in water relations, hydraulic architecture and terpene composition of Aleppo pine seedlings from Italian provenances. Tree Physiol 17: 241-250.
45. van Buijtenen JP, Bilan MV, Zimmerman RH (1976) Morpho-physiological characteristics related to drought resistance in Pinus taeda. In: Cannell MGR, Last FT (eds) Tree physiology and yield improvement. Academic Press, New York, pp 349-359.
46. Woeste EK, Jacobs DF, McKenna JR (2011) Half-sib seed source and nursery sowing density affect black walnut (Juglans nigra) growth after 5 years. New For 41: 235-245.
47. Zhang JW, Feng Z, Cregg BM, Schumann CM (1997) Carbon isotopic composition, gas exchange, and growth of three populations of ponderosa pine differing in drought tolerance. Tree Physiol 7: 461-466.
48. Zlatanov T, Velichkov I, Lexer JM, Dubravec T (2010) Regeneration dynamics in aging black pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) plantations on the south slopes of the Middle Balkan Range in Bulgaria. New For 40(3): 289-303.