Causal tapestries for psychology and physics

Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 113-136

  Sulis, William H ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Causal tapestry; Dimension; Lorentz invariance; Process theory; Transient now

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MATHEMATICS; MOTIVATION; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PERCEPTION; PHYSICS; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SEMANTICS; SOCIAL SUPPORT; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CAUSALITY; COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOTIVATION; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PERCEPTION; PHYSICS; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SEMANTICS; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 84865373906     PISSN: 10900578     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Andersen, P. B., Emmeche, C., Finnemann, N. O., & Christiansen, P. V. (Eds.). (2000). Downward causation. Oxford: Aarhus University Press.
2. Barnsley, M. (2006). Superfractals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
3. Berlekamp, E. R., Conway, J. H. & Guy, R .K. (2004). Winning ways for your mathematical plays, Volumes 1-4. Wellesley, MA: A.K.Peters.
4. Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. London: ARK Borchers, H. J. & Sen, R. N. (2006). Mathematical implications of Einstein-Weyl causality. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
5. Borchers, H. J. & Sen, R. N. (2006). Mathematical implications of Einstein-Weyl causality. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
6. Coecke, B. (2011). New structures for physics. Berlin: Springer.
7. Dowker, F., Henson, J. & Sorkin, R. D. (2004), Quantum gravity phenomenology, Lorentz invariance and discreteness, Modern Physics Letters A19, 1829-1840.
8. Favareau, D. (2010). Essential readings in biosemiotics. Berlin: Springer.
9. Kauffman, S. (2000). Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Kempf, A. (2009). Information theoretic natural ultraviolet cutoof for spacetime. Physical Review Letters, 103, 231301-231304.
11. Khrennikov, A. (2010). Ubiquitous quantum structure. From psychology to finance. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
12. Kim, D. (2010). The group of causal automorphisms. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 27, 155005-155009.
13. Mermin, D. (1993). Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell. Reviews of Modern Physics, 65, 803-815.
14. Meyer, D. (1988). The dimension of causal sets. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachussetts Institute of Technology.
15. Oriti, D. (ed.) (2009). Approaches to quantum gravity: Towards a new understanding of space, time and matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Palmer, T. (1995). A local deterministic model of quantum spin measurement. Proceedings of the. Royal Society of London. A, 451, 585-608.
17. Pearl, J. (2009). Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Shimony, A. (1993a). Search for a naturalistic world view. Volume II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Spekkens, R. (2011). Personal communication.
20. Sulis, W. (1989). Order automata. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Western Ontario.
21. Sulis, W. (2000). The neural basis of mental representations: nonlinear perspectives. In Sulis, W. & Trofimova, I. (Eds.) Nonlinear dynamics in the life and social sciences. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
22. Sulis, W. (2008). Stochastic phase decoupling in dynamical networks. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 12, 327-358.
23. Sulis, W. (2010). Archetypal dynamics, emergent situations, and the reality game. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 14, 209-238.
24. Sulis, W. (2011). Reality games for causal tapestries. (In preparation).
25. Trotter, W. T. (1992). Combinatorics and partially ordered sets. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
26. Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality (Corrected edition). New York: The Free Press.