Robust and sensitive analysis of methanol and ethanol from cellulose degradation in mineral oils

Journal of Chromatography A

Volumn 1256, Issue , 2012, Pages 240-245

  Jalbert, Jocelyn ^a   Duchesne, Steve ^a   Rodriguez Celis, Esperanza ^a   Tétreault, Pierre ^a   Collin, Pascal ^a  

^a HYDRO QUÉBEC   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aging indicator; Cellulose degradation; Ethanol; Insulating oil; Insulating paper; Methanol

Indexed keywords

ANALYTES; ANALYTICAL METHOD; CELLULOSE DEGRADATION; CONTROL CHARTS; CONTROL SOLUTIONS; DIRECT ANALYSIS; ELECTRICAL UTILITIES; END-OF-LIFE; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHS; INSULATING PAPER; INSULATION MATERIALS; INTERNAL STANDARDS; METHOD DETECTION LIMITS; METHOD VALIDATIONS; OIL MATRIX; RELATIVE ERRORS; REPRODUCIBILITIES; SENSITIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATIONS; STANDARDIZED METHODS; STATIC HEADSPACE;

CELLULOSE; CRUDE OIL; DEGRADATION; INSULATING MATERIALS; INSULATING OIL; METHANOL; MINERAL OILS; OIL FILLED TRANSFORMERS; POWER TRANSFORMERS; TRACE ANALYSIS;

ETHANOL;

ALCOHOL; CELLULOSE; METHANOL; MINERAL OIL; PETROLEUM;

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE ANALYSIS; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; LIMIT OF DETECTION; MASS SPECTROMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; STANDARDIZATION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

CALIBRATION; CELLULOSE; ETHANOL; LIMIT OF DETECTION; METHANOL; MINERAL OIL;

EID: 84865365316     PISSN: 00219673     EISSN: 18733778     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.07.069     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Tamura R., Anetai H., Ishii T., Kawamura T. JIEE Proc. Pub. A 1981, 101:30-36.
2. Burton P.J., Carballeira M., Duval M., Fuller C.W., Graham J., De Pablo A., Samat J., Spicar E. Pro. CIGRE Conf. 1998.
3. Griffin P.J., Lewand L.R., Pahlavanpour B. Minutes 61st Annual Intl. Conf. of Doble Clients, Sec. 10-5.1 1994.
4. Lundgaard L.E., Hansen W., Linhjell D., Painter T. IEEE Trans. Power Deliver. 2004, 19:230-239.
5. Scheirs J., Camino G., Avidano M., Tumiatti W. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1998, 69:2541-2547.
6. Allan D.M., Jones C.F. 9th Int. Symposium on High Voltage Engineering 1995, 1-4. pp. 1004.
7. M.C. Lessard, et al., Furanic compounds for diagnosis, CIGRé Working Group D1.01.TF13. Technical Report, April 2012.
8. L. Cheim, D. Platts, T. Prevost, S. Xu, IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine, Vol. 28, No. 2, March-April 2012.
9. Jalbert J., Gilbert R., Tétreault P., Morin B., Lessard-Déziel D. Cellulose 2007, 14:295-309.
10. Schaut A., Autru S., Eeckhoudt S. IEEE Trans. Dielect. Elect. In. 2011, 18:533-540.
11. J. Jalbert, R. Gilbert, Y. Denos, P. Gervais, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 27, No. 2, April 2012.
12. Gilbert R., Jalbert J., Tétreault P., Morin B., Denos Y. Cellulose 2009, 16:327-338.
13. Gilbert R., Jalbert J., Duchesne S., Tétreault P., Morin B., Denos Y. Cellulose 2010, 17:253-269.
14. M. Ryadi, A. Tanguy, J. Jalbert, C. Rajotte, CIGRE A2 and D1 Joint Colloquium, Kyoto, Japan, PS2-0-4, 2011.
15. Kolb B., Ettre L.S. Static Headspace-Gas Chromatography: Theory and Practice 2006, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ. 2nd ed.
16. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Petroleum Products and Lubricants (IV): D6973. 05.04, Conshohocken, PA, 2009.
17. Portari G., Marchini J., Jordao A. Lab. Med. 2008, 39:42-45.
18. Zuba D., Parczewski A., Reichenbacher M. J. Chromatogr. B 2002, 773:75-82.
19. Mittelbach M., Roth G., Bergmann A. Chromatographia 1996, 42:431-434.
20. Knothe G. JAOCS 2006, 83:823-833.
21. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Revised assessment of detection and quantitation approaches. Chapter 5.1: Detection Limit Approaches, EPA-821-B-04-005, Washington, DC, 2004.
22. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA); Definition and Procedure for the Determination of the Method Detection Limit. Revision 1.11, 40CFR-Part 136, Appendix B, 2004.