Will Hunters Steward Wolves? A Comment on Treves and Martin

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 97-102

  Bruskotter, Jeremy T ^a   Fulton, David C ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

acceptance; carnivores; conservation; hunters; intolerance; stewardship; tolerance

Indexed keywords

CANID; CARNIVORE; HUNTER-GATHERER; NATURE CONSERVATION; SUSTAINABILITY; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

ROCKY MOUNTAINS; UNITED STATES; WISCONSIN;

CANIDAE;

EID: 84865356707     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2011.622735     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decision Processes 50: 179-211.
2. Bright, A. D., and M. J. Manfredo. 1996. A conceptual model of attitudes toward natural resource issues: A case study of wolf reintroduction. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 1 (1): 1-21.
3. Bruskotter, J. T., and D. C. Fulton. 2007. The influence of anglers value orientations on fisheries stewardship norms. In Aquatic stewardship education in theory and practice, ed. B. A. Knuth and W. F. Siemer, 157-168. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.
4. Bruskotter, J. T., and D. C. Fulton. 2008. Minnesota anglers' fisheries-related value orientations and their stewardship of fish resources. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 13 (4): 207-221.
5. Bruskotter, J. T., E. Toman, Sherry A. Enzler, and R. H. Schmidt. 2010. Are gray wolves endangered in the northern Rocky Mountains? A role for social science in endangered species listing determinations. BioScience 60 (11): 941-948.
6. Carpenter, L. H., D. J. Decker, and J. F. Lipscomb. 2000. Stakeholder acceptance capacity in wildlife management. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. Int. J. 5 (3): 5-19.
7. Cronbach, L. J., and P. E. Meehl. 1955. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol. Bull. 52: 281-302.
8. Decker, D. J., and K. G. Purdy. 1988. Toward a concept of wildlife acceptance capacity in wildlife management. Wildl. Soci. Bull. 16 (1): 53-57.
9. Eagly, A. H., and S. Chaiken. 1993. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
10. Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 2010. Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press.
11. Fuller, T. K. 1989. Population dynamics of wolves in north-central Minnesota. Wildl. Monogr. 105.
12. Gigliotti, L., D. J. Decker, and L. H. Carpenter. 2000. Developing the wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity concept: Research needed. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. Int. J. 5 (3): 76-82.
13. Lischka, S. A., S. J. Riley, and B. A. Rudolph. 2008. Effects of impact perception on acceptance capacity for white-tailed deer. J. Wildl. Manage. 72 (2): 502-509.
14. Meadow, R., R. P. Reading, M. Phillips, M. Mehringer, and B. J. Miller. 2005. The influence of persuasive arguments on public attitudes toward a proposed wolf restoration in the southern Rockies. Wildl. Soci. Bull. 33 (1): 154-163.
15. Reiter, D., M. Brunson, and R. H. Schmidt. 1999. Public attitudes toward wildlife damage management and policy. Wildl. Soci. Bull. 27: 746-758.
16. Riley, S. J., and D. J. Decker. 2000a. Wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity for cougars in Montana. Wildl. Soci. Bull. 28 (4): 931-939.
17. Riley, S. J., and D. J. Decker. 2000b. Risk perception as a factor in wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity for cougars in Montana. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. Int. J. 5 (3): 50-62.
18. Schwartz, S. H. 1968. Awareness of consequences and the influence of moral norms on interpersonal behavior. Sociometry 31 (4): 355-369.
19. Smith, D. W., E. E. Bangs, J. K. Oakleaf, C. Mack, J. A. Fontaine, D. Boyd, M. Jimenez, D. H. Pletscher, C. C. Niemeyer, T. J. Meier, D. R. Stahler, J. Holyan, V. J. Asher, and D. L. Murray. 2010. Survival of colonizing wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains of the United States, 1982-2004. J. Wildl. Manage. 74 (4): 620-634.
20. Stern, P. C., T. Dietz, T. Abel, G. A. Guagnano, and L. Kalof. 1999. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmental concern. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 6: 81-97.
21. Treves, A., and K. A. Martin. 2011. Hunters as stewards of wolves in Wisconsin and the Northern Rocky Mountains, USA. Society Nat. Resources 24: 984-994.
22. Vaske, J. J., and D. Whittaker. 2004. Normative approaches to natural resources. In Society & natural resources: A summary of knowledge, ed. M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, B. L. Bruyere, D. R. Field, and P. J. Brown, 283-294. Jefferson, MO: Modern Litho.
23. Wilson, M. A. 1997. The wolf in Yellowstone: Science, symbol, or politics? Deconstructing the conflict between environmentalism and wise use. Society Nat. Resources 10: 453-468.
24. Wilson, R. S., and J. T. Bruskotter. 2009. Assessing the impact of decision frame and existing attitudes on support for wolf restoration in the United States. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 14 (5): 353-365.
25. Zinn, H. C., and M. J. Manfredo. 2000. An experimental test of rational and emotional appeals about a recreation issue. Leisure Sci. 22: 183-194.
26. Zinn, H. C., M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, and K. Wittmann. 1998. Using normative beliefs to determine the acceptability of wildlife management actions. Society Nat. Resources 11: 649-662.