The myth of participation in occupational therapy: Reconceptualizing a client-centred approach

Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 421-427

  Kjellberg, Anette ^a   Kåhlin, Ida ^a   Haglund, Lena ^a   Taylor, Renée R ^b  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Intellectual disabilities; Learning disabilities; Mental health; Mental illness; Occupational therapist; Practice

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; LEARNING DISORDER; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SWEDEN;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING DISORDERS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SWEDEN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865334364     PISSN: 11038128     EISSN: 16512014     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/11038128.2011.627378     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:569-76.
2. Kielhofner G. Therapeutic reasoning: Using occupational therapy's conceptual foundations in everyday practice. In Kielhofner G, Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy. 4th ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 2009. p 279-99.
3. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
4. Kielhofner G. Model of Human Occupation: Theory and application. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
5. United Nations. The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. UN. 2006. Available at http://www.un.org (accessed 23 August 2010).
6. Creek J, Lawson-Porter A. Contemporary issues in occupational therapy: Reasoning and reflection. Chichester: Wiley; 2007.
7. Vessby K, Kjellberg A. Participation in occupational therapy research: A literature review. Br J Occup Ther 2010;73:319-26.
8. Taylor RR. The intentional relationship: Occupational therapy and use of self. Philadelphia: FA. Davis; 2008.
9. Maitra KK, Erway F. Perception of client-centred practice in occupational therapists and their clients. Am J Occup Ther 2006;60:298-10.
10. Palmadottir G. Client-therapist relationships: Experiences of occupational therapy clients in rehabilitation. Br J Occup Ther 2006;69:394-01.
11. Townsend E. Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2002.
12. Sumsion T. Facilitating client-centered practice: Insights from clients. Can J Occup Ther 2005;72:13-20.
13. Hedberg-Kristensson E, Dahlin Ivanoff S, Iwarsson S. Participation in the prescription process of mobility devices: Experience among older patients. Br J Occup Ther 2006; 69:169-76.
14. Kielhofner G, Taylor RR. Re-defining client-centered practice in occupational therapy. Paper presented to the Italian Occupational Therapy Association, Naples, Italy; 2010.
15. Law M, Baptiste S, Mills J. Client-centred practice: What does it mean and does it make a difference? Can J Occup Ther 1995;62:250-7.
16. SFS 1982:763. Hälso-och sjukvårdslagen [The health and medical services act] (in Swedish). Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.
17. SFS 1993:387. Lagen om stöd och service till vissa funktion-shindrade [The act concerning support and service for persons with certain functional impairments] (in Swedish). Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.
18. SFS 2001:453. Socialtjänstlagen [The social services act] (in Swedish). Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.
19. Swedish Association of Occupational Therapists. Code of ethics for occupational therapists. Nacka: Swedish Association of Occupational Therapists; 2005.
20. Larsson Lund M, Tamm M, BränholmI-B. Patients' perceptions of their participation in rehabilitation planning and professionals' view of their strategies to encourage it. Occup Ther Int 2001;8:151-67.
21. Palmadottir G. Client perspectives on occupational therapy in rehabilitation services. Scand J Occup Ther 2003;10:157-66.
22. Goodley D. Self-advocacy in the lives of people with learning difficulties. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press; 2000.
23. Vetenskapsrådet. Forskningsetiska principer i humanistisk- samhällsvetenskaplig forskning [Research ethical principles in humanistic and social science] (in Swedish). Available at http://www.codex.vr.se/texts/ HSFR.pdf (accessed 23 August 2010).
24. Swedish Association of Occupational Therapists. Available at http://www.fsa.akademikerhuset.se (accessed 19 September 2005).
25. Kjellberg A. More or less independent. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24:828-40.
26. Kinebanian A, Stomph M. Cross-cultural occupational therapy: A critical reflection. Am J Occup Ther 1992;46:751-7.
27. Whiteford GE, Wilcock AA. Cultural relativism: Occupation and independence reconsidered. Can J Occup Ther 2000;67: 324-36.
28. Rogers CR. On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. New York: Houghton Mifflin; 1961.