Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire;Kol, omuz ve el sorunlari (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand - DASH) anketi Türkçe uyarlamasinin güvenirligi ve geçerliǧi

Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 99-107

  Düger, Tülin ^a   Yakut, Edibe ^a   Öksüz, Çiǧdem ^a   Yörükan, Selma ^a   Bilgütay, Burcu Semin ^a   Ayhan, Çiǧdem ^a   Leblebicioǧlu, Gürsel ^a   Kayihan, Hülya ^a   Kirdi, Nuray ^a   Yakut, Yavuz ^a   Güler, Çaǧatay ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

DASH Questionnaire; Outcome measures; Turkish version; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865325910     PISSN: 13008757     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Colville RJ, Nicholson KS, Belcher HJ. Hand surgery and quality of life. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1999;24:263-266. (Pubitemid 29322246)
2. Szabo RM. Outcomes assessment in hand surgery: when are they meaningful? J Hand Surg [Am]. 2001;26:993-1002. (Pubitemid 33086427)
3. Davis AM, Beaton DE, Hudak P, et al. Measuring disability of the upper extremity: a rationale supporting the use of a regional outcome measure. J Hand Then 1999;12:269-274. (Pubitemid 30013574)
4. Overend TJ, Wuori-Fearn JL, Kramer JF, et al. Reliability of a patient-rated forearm evaluation questionnaire for patients with lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Ther. 1999;12:31-37. (Pubitemid 29120162)
5. Chiari-Grisar C, Koller U, Stamm TA, et al. Performance of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome questionnaire and the Moberg picking up test in patients with finger joint arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:203-206. (Pubitemid 43151294)
6. Jester A, Harth A, Germann G. Measuring levels of upper-extremity disability in employed adults using the DASH Questionnaire. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2005;30:1074.
7. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602-608.
8. Jester A, Harth A, Wind G, et al. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire: determining functional activity profiles in patients with upper extremity disorders. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2005;30:23-28. (Pubitemid 40058050)
9. Turchin DC, Beaton DE, Richards RR. Validity of observer-based aggregate scoring systems as descriptors of elbow pain, function, and disability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:154-162. (Pubitemid 28103379)
10. McConnel S, Beaton DE, Bombardier C. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand: the DASH outcome measure user's manual. 1st ed. Toronto: Institute for Work and Health; 1999.
11. Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:913-923. (Pubitemid 28527146)
12. Gummcsson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;16;4:11.
13. Gay RE, Amadio PC, Johnson JC. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2003;28:250-254. (Pubitemid 36373321)
14. SooHoo NF, McDonald AP, Seiler JG, et al. Evaluation of the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2002;27:537-541. (Pubitemid 34522585)
15. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:1417-1432. (Pubitemid 24017263)
16. Ware JE Jr, Keller SD, Gandek B, et al. Evaluating translations of health status questionnaires. Methods from the IQOLA project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995;11:525-551.
17. Beaton DE, Bambardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the cross-cultural adaptation of self report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186-3191. (Pubitemid 32042951)
18. Offenbaecher M, Ewert T, Sangha O, et al. Validation of a German version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH-G). J Rheumatol. 2002;29:401-402. (Pubitemid 34118799)
19. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Andersson B, et al. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:613-618.
20. Padua R, Padua L, Ceccarelli E, et al. Italian version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2003;28:179-186. (Pubitemid 36401702)
21. Hervas MT, Navarro Collado MJ, Peiro S, et al. Spanish version of the DASH questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and responsiveness. Med Clin (Bare). 2006;127:441-447. (Pubitemid 44745462)
22. Themistocleous GS, Goudelis G, Kyrou I, et al. Translation into Greek, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). J Hand Ther. 2006;19:350-357. (Pubitemid 44067408)
23. Orfale AG, Araujo PM, Ferraz MB, et al. Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the reliability of the Disabilities of the Aim, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2005;38:293-302. (Pubitemid 40372606)
24. Dubert T, Voche P, Dumontier C, et al. The DASH questionnaire. French translation of a trans-cultural adaptation. Chir Main. 2001;20:294-302. (Pubitemid 32845172)
25. Ware JE, Shcrbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.
26. Martin DP, Engelberg R, Agel J, et al. Comparison of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire with the Short Form-36, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the Sickness Impact Profile health-status measures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1323-1335. (Pubitemid 27413161)
27. Koçyiǧit H, Aydemir O, Fisek G, ve ark. Kisa Form-36 (KF-36)'nin TüRkçE versiyonunun güvenilirliǧi ve geçerliliǧi. Ilač ve Tedavi Dergisi. 1999;12:102-106.
28. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420-428.
29. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundation of Clinical Research Application to Practice. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange; 1993.
30. Engelberg R, Martin DP, Agel J, et al. Musculoskeletal Function Assessment instrument: criterion and construct validity. J Orthop Res. 1996;14:182-192. (Pubitemid 26145987)
31. Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care. 1990;28:632-642.
32. Bessette L, Sangha O, Kuntz KM, et al. Comparative responsiveness of generic versus disease-specific and weighted versus unweighted health status measures in carpal tunnel syndrome. Med Care. 1998;36:491-502. (Pubitemid 128452876)
33. Sauerbier M, Kluge S, Bickert B, et al. Subjective and objective outcomes after total wrist arthrodesis in patients with radiocarpal arthrosis or Kienbock's disease. Chir Main. 2000;19:223-231.
34. Sauerbier M, Trankle M, Erdmann D, et al. Functional outcome with scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthrodesis in the treatment of Kienbock's disease stage III. Ann Plast Surg. 2000;44:618-625. (Pubitemid 30397254)
35. Hannah SD, Hudak PL. Splinting and radial nerve palsy: a single-subject experiment. J Hand Ther. 2001; 14:195-201. (Pubitemid 32730229)
36. Pomerance J. Outcome after repair of the scapholunate interosseous ligament and dorsal capsulodesis for dynamic scapholunate instability due to trauma. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2006;31:1380-1386. (Pubitemid 44486581)