Aquifer nitrate vulnerability assessment using positive and negative weights of evidence methods, Milan, Italy

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 48, Issue , 2012, Pages 199-210

  Sorichetta, Alessandro ^a   Masetti, Marco ^a   Ballabio, Cristiano ^b   Sterlacchini, Simone ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^c CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Adjusted contrasts; Groundwater vulnerability assessment; Map reliability; Map spatial agreement; Sample bias; Weights of evidence

Indexed keywords

ADJUSTED CONTRASTS; COMBINED EFFECT; EXPLANATORY VARIABLES; GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION; GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY; MILAN , ITALY; MODELING TECHNIQUE; MULTI-CLASS; NITRATE CONTAMINATION; PHYSICAL PROCESS; QUANTITATIVE METHODOLOGY; SAMPLE BIAS; SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS; STUDY AREAS; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS; WEIGHTS OF EVIDENCE;

AQUIFERS; CONTAMINATION; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; HYDROGEOLOGY; SAMPLING;

GROUNDWATER POLLUTION;

AQUIFER; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; MAPPING; NITRATE; POROSITY; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SAMPLING BIAS; UNCONFINED AQUIFER; VULNERABILITY; WATER QUALITY;

ITALY; LOMBARDY; MILANO [LOMBARDY];

EID: 84865321005     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.05.021     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Acutis, M., Provolo, M., 2003. Stime dei Carichi Diffusi di Azoto, Fosforo e Fitofarmaci da Agricoltura Nelle Acque di Superficie della Lombardia (Estimation of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Pesticide Loads due Agricultural Activities Entering Surface Waters in Lombardy). In: Piano di Tutela delle Acque della Regione Lombardia, Allegato 7, IReR, Milano, 53 pp. (in Italian).
2. Agterberg F.P., Bonham-Carter G.F., Cheng Q., Wright D.F. Weights of Evidence modeling and weighted logistic regression for mineral potential. Computers in Geology-25 Years of Progress 1993, 13-32. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. J.C. Davis, U.C. Herzfeld (Eds.).
3. Akbar T.A., Lin H., DeGroote J. Development and evaluation of GIS-based ArcPRZM-3 system for spatial modeling of groundwater vulnerability to pesticide contamination. Computers & Geosciences 2011, 37:822-830.
4. Alberti, L., De Amicis, M., Masetti, M., Sterlacchini, S., 2001. Bayes' rule and GIS for evaluating sensitivity of groundwater to contamination. In: Proceedings of 2001 Annual Conference of the International Association for Mathematical Geology (IAMG), Cancun, Mexico.
5. Arthur, J.D., Baker, A.E., Cichon, J.R., Wood, A.R., Rudin, A., 2005. Florida Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment (FAVA): Contamination Potential of Florida's Principal Aquifer Systems. Division of Resource Assessment and Management, Florida Geological Survey. URL: (accessed October 10, 2011). http://publicfiles.dep.state.fl.us/.
6. Arthur J.D., Wood H.A.R., Baker A.E., Cichon J.R., Raines G.L. Development and implementation of a Bayesian-based aquifer vulnerability assessment in Florida. Natural Resources Research 2007, 16:93-107.
7. Bonham-Carter G.F. Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists-Modelling with GIS 1994, Pergamon Press, Elsevier Science, New York, NY, 398pp.
8. Bonham-Carter G.F., Agterberg F.P., Wright D.F. Weights of evidence modeling: a new approach to mapping mineral potential. Statistical Applications in the Earth Sciences 1989, 171-183. Geological Survey of Canada. F.P. Agterberg, G.F. Bonham-Carter (Eds.).
9. Burow K.R., Nolan B.T., Rupert M.G., Dubrovsky N. Nitrate in groundwater of the United States, 1991-2003. Environmental Sciences & Technology 2010, 44:4988-4997.
10. Carranza E.J.M., Hale M. Geologically constrained probabilistic mapping of gold potential, Baguio District, Philippines. Natural Resources Research 2000, 9(3):237-253.
11. Carrara A.M., Cardinali M., Detti R., Guzzetti F., Pasqui V., Reichenbach P. GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 1991, 16:427-445.
12. Cheng Q. Application of weights of evidence method for assessment of flowing wells in the Greater Toronto area, Canada. Natural Resources Research 2004, 13:77-86.
13. Cheng Q., Bonham-Carter G., Wang W., Zhang S., Li W., Qinglin.X. A spatially weighted principal component analysis for multi-element geochemical data for mapping locations of Felsic intrusions in the Gejiu mineral district of Yunnan, China. Computers & Geosciences 2011, 37(5):662-669.
14. Chung C.F. Using likelihood ratio functions for modeling the conditional probability of occurrence of future landslides for risk assessment. Computers & Geosciences 2006, 32(8):1052-1068.
15. Chung, C.F., Fabbri, A.G., 1998. Three Bayesian prediction models for landslide hazard. In: Bucciantti A. (Ed.), Proceedings of 1998 Annual Conference of International Association for Mathematical Geology (IAMG), Ischia, Italy, pp. 204-211.
16. Chung C.F., Fabbri A.G., van Westen C.J. Multivariate regression analysis for landslide hazard zonation. Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazards 1995, 107-142. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. A. Carrara, F. Guzzetti (Eds.).
17. Cinnirella S., Buttafuoco G., Pirrone N. Stochastic analysis to assess the spatial distribution of groundwater nitrate concentrations in the Po catchment (Italy). Environmental Pollution 2005, 133(3):569-580.
18. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960, 20:37-46.
19. Coolbaugh M.F., Raines G.L., Zehner R.E. Assessment of exploration bias in data-driven predictive models and the estimation of undiscovered resources. Natural Resources Research 2007, 16:199-207.
20. Dahal R.K., Hasegawa S., Nonomura A., Yamanaka M., Dhakal S., Paudyal P. Predictive modelling of rainfall-induced landslide hazard in the Lesser Himalaya of Nepal based on weights-of-evidence. Geomorphology 2008, 102:496-510.
21. Davis J.C., Chung C.-J., Ohlmacher G.C. Two models for evaluating landslide hazards. Computers & Geosciences 2006, 32(8):1120-1127.
22. de Quadros T.F.P., Koppe J.C., Strieder A.J., Costa J.F.C.L. Mineral-potential mapping: a comparison of weights-of-evidence and fuzzy methods. Natural Resources Research 2006, 15(1):49-65.
23. Dixon B., Scott H.D., Dixon J.C., Steele K.F. Prediction of aquifer vulnerability to pesticides using fuzzy rule-based models at the regional scale. Physical Geography 2002, 23(2):130-153.
24. Eckhardt D.A.V., Stackelberg P.E. Relation of groundwater quality to land use on Long Island, New York. Ground Water 1995, 33(6):1019-1033.
25. ERSAF-Ente di Ricerca per lo Sviluppo Agricolo e Forestale, 2003. Carta di Uso del Suolo Agricolo e Forestale della Regione Lombardia (Land Use Map of Lombardy Region). Destinazione d'Uso dei Suoli Agricoli e Forestali (DUSAF), scale 1:10 000. URL: (Accessed October 10, 2011). http://www.cartografia.regione.lombardia.it/rlregisdownload/.
26. ERSAF-Ente di Ricerca per lo Sviluppo Agricolo e Forestale, 2004. Strumenti ed Indirizzi per la Gestione Multifunzionale dei Suoli Agricoli (SIGMA) (Tools and Guidelines for the Management of Agricultural Soils). In: Piano di Tutela delle Acque della Regione Lombardia, Allegato 10, IReR, Milano, 102 pp. (in Italian).
27. ESRI - Environmental Systems Research Institute, 2008. ArcGIS Desktop 9.3, Redlands, CA, (Accessed October 10, 2011). http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcgis-for-desktop/index.html.
28. Fang J.H. Fuzzy logic and geology. Geotimes 1997, 42(10):23-26.
29. Gardner K., Vogel R. Predicting ground water nitrate concentration from land use. Ground Water 2005, 43:343-352.
30. Goovaerts P. Geostatistics for Environmental Applications 1997, Oxford University Press, New York, 483pp.
31. Gurdak, J.J., Qi, S.L., 2006. Vulnerability of Recently Recharged Ground Water in the High Plains Aquifer to Nitrate Contamination: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5050, US Department of the Interior, Reston, VA, 39 pp.
32. Guzzella L., Pozzoni F., Giuliano G. Herbicide contamination of surficial groundwater in Northern Italy. Environmental Pollution 2006, 142(2):344-353.
33. Harris D.P., Zurcher L., Stanley M., Marlow J., Pan G. A comparative analysis of favorability mappings by weights of evidence, probabilistic neural networks, discriminant analysis, and logistic regression. Natural Resources Research 2003, 12:241-255.
34. Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression 1989, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 307pp.
35. ISTAT, 2001. Popolazione Residente Censita al 2001 (Popolazione Legale) e al 1991, Differenze e Densità Abitativa, Per Comune. Censimento 2001 (Legal Residential Population in 2001 and 1991, Population Variation and Density, for each Municipality. 2001 Census data). URL: (Accessed October 10, 2011). http://dawinci.istat.it/daWinci/jsp/dwDownload.jsp?tav=home.
36. Lee S., Min K. Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environmental Geology 2001, 40(9):1095-1113.
37. Lee S., Ryu J.-H., Kim I.-S. Landslide susceptibility analysis and its verification using likelihood ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models: case study of Youngin, Korea. Landslides 2007, 4:327-338.
38. Leite E.P., de Souza Filho C.R. Probabilistic neural networks applied to mineral potential mapping for platinum group elements in the Serra Leste region, Carajás Mineral Province, Brazil. Computers & Geosciences 2009, 35(3):675-687.
39. Masetti M., Poli S., Sterlacchini S. The use of the weights-of-evidence modeling technique to estimate the vulnerability of groundwater to nitrate contamination. Natural Resources Research 2007, 16:109-119.
40. Masetti M., Poli S., Sterlacchini S., Beretta G.P., Facchi A. Spatial and statistical assessment of factors influencing nitrate contamination in groundwater. Journal of Environmental Management 2008, 86:272-281.
41. Masetti M., Sterlacchini S., Ballabio C., Sorichetta A., Poli S. Influence of threshold value in the use of statistical methods for groundwater vulnerability assessment. Science of the Total Environment 2009, 407:3836-3846.
42. Nolan B.T., Hitt K.J., Ruddy B.C. Probability of nitrate contamination of recently recharged groundwaters in the conterminous United States. Environmental Science & Technology 2002, 36:2138-2145.
43. Nolan B.T., Hitt K.J. Vulnerability of shallow groundwater and drinking-water wells to nitrate in the United States. Environmental Sciences & Technology 2006, 40:7834-7840.
44. NRC-National Research Council Ground Water Vulnerability Assessment: Predictive Relative Contamination Potential Under Conditions of Uncertainty 1993, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 224 pp.
45. Oh H.-J., Pradhan B. Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide-susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area. Computers &Geosciences 2011, 37:1264-1276.
46. Raines G.L. Evaluation of weights of evidence to predict epithermal-gold deposits in the great basin of the Western United States. Natural Resources Research 1999, 8:257-276.
47. Raines G.L., Bonham-Carter G.F. Introduction to special issue on spatial modeling in GIS. Natural Resources Research 2007, 16:81-84.
48. Sawatzky, D.L., Raines, G.L., Bonham-Carter, G.F., Looney, C.G., 2009. Spatial Data Modeler (SDM): ArcMAP 9.3 Geoprocessing Tools for Spatial Data Modelling Using Weights of Evidence, Logistic Regression, Fuzzy Logic and Neural Network, , (Accessed October 10, 2011). http://www.ige.unicamp.br/sdm/default_e.htm.
49. Schwab G.O., Fangmeier D.D., Elliot W.J., Frevert R.K. Soil and Water Conservation Engineering 1993, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 507pp. fourth ed.
50. Simpson P.K. Artificial Neural System-Foundation, Paradigm, Application and Implementation 1990, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, 209pp.
51. Sorichetta A., Masetti M., Ballabio C., Sterlacchini S., Beretta G.P. Reliability of groundwater vulnerability maps obtained through statistical methods. Journal of Environmental Management 2011, 92:1215-1224.
52. Sterlacchini S., Ballabio C., Blahut J., Masetti M., Sorichetta A. Spatial agreement of predicted patterns in landslide susceptibility maps. Geomorphology 2011, 125(1):51-61.
53. Tesoriero A.J., Voss F.D. Predicting the probability of elevated nitrate concentrations in the puget basin: implications for aquifer susceptibility and vulnerability. Ground Water 1997, 35(6):1029-1039.
54. Tesoriero, A.J., Inkpen, E.L., Voss, F.D., 1998. Assessing groundwater vulnerability using logistic regression. In: Proceedings for the Source Water Assessment and Protection 98 Conference, Dallas, TX, pp. 157-165.
55. Twarakavi N.K.C., Kaluarachchi J.J. Aquifer vulnerability assessment to heavy metals using ordinal logistic regression. Ground Water 2005, 43(2):200-214.
56. USSCS-United States Soil Conservation Service National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology 1964, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 30pp.
57. USGS-United States Geological Survey The Quality of Our Nations Waters-Nutrients and Pesticides: US Geological Survey Circular 1225 1999, US Department of the Interior, Reston, VA.
58. Worral F., Besien T. The vulnerability of groundwater to pesticide contamination estimated directly from observations of presence or absence in wells. Journal of Hydrology 2005, 303:92-107.
59. Yilmaz I. Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey). Computers & Geosciences 2009, 35(6):1125-1138.