Robust principal component analysis of electromagnetic arrays with missing data

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 190, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1423-1438

  Smirnov, M Yu ^a   Egbert, G D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Geomagnetic induction; Magnetotelluric; Time series analysis

Indexed keywords

DATA DENIAL EXPERIMENTS; ELECTROMAGNETIC ARRAYS; GEOMAGNETIC INDUCTION; HETEROGENEOUS ARRAY; INCOMPLETE DATA; LARGE DATA; MAGNETOTELLURIC; MISSING DATA; MULTI VARIATE ANALYSIS; MULTIVARIATE METHODS; POLARIZATION PARAMETERS; ROBUST PCA; ROBUST PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; ROBUST REGRESSIONS; SITE OCCUPATION; SPATIAL MODES; STATISTICAL LITERATURE; SYNTHETIC AND REAL DATA;

ALGORITHMS; ELECTROMAGNETISM; GEOMAGNETISM; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

ROBUST CONTROL;

ALGORITHM; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; GEOMAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOTELLURIC METHOD; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

EID: 84865298227     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05569.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Banks, R., 1969. Geomagnetic variations and the electrical conductivity of the upper mantle, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 17, 457-487.
2. Bransky, L.N., Borokov, J.E., Gohkberg, M.B., Krylov, S.M. & Trotskaya, V., 1985. High resolution method of direct measurement of magnetic field lines eigenfrequencies, Planet. Space Sci., 33, 1369-1375.
3. Croux, C., Filzmoser, P. & Oliveira, M.R., 2007. Algorithms for projection pursuit robust principal component analysis, Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst., 87, 218-225.
4. Daszykowski, M., Serneels, S., Kaczmarek, K., Espen, P.V., Croux, C. & Walczak, B., 2007. TOMCAT: a MATLAB toolbox for multivariate calibration techniques, Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst., 85, 269-277.
5. De La Torre, F. & Black, M.J., 2003. A framework for robust subspace learning, Int. J. Comput. Vision, 54, 117-142.
6. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M. & Rubin, D.B., 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm, J. R. Statist. Soc. Series B (Methodological), 39, 1-38.
7. Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R., 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, FL
8. Egbert, G.D., 1989. Multivariate analysis of geomagnetic array data 2. Random source models, J. geophys. Res., 94(B10), 14249-14265.
9. Egbert, G.D., 1997. Robust multiple-station magnetotelluric data processing, Geophys. J. Int., 130, 475-496, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb05663.x.
10. Egbert, G.D., 2002. Processing and interpretation of electromagnetic induction array data, Surv. Geophys., 23, 207-249, doi:10.1023/A:1015012821040.
11. Egbert, G.D., 2008. Source complications in earthscope magnetotelluric data: challenges and opportunities, in The 19th International Workshop on EM Induction in The Earth, Beijing, China, 2008 October 23-29.
12. Egbert, G.D. & Booker, J.R., 1989. Multivariate analysis of geomagnetic array data 1. The response space, J. geophys. Res., 94(B10), 14227-14247.
13. Egbert, G.D. & Booker, J.R., 1993. Imaging crustal structure in southwestern Washington with small magnetometer arrays, J. geophys. Res., 98(B9), 15967-15985.
14. Egbert, G.D., Eisel, M., Boyd, O.S. & Morrison, H.F., 2000. DC trains and PC3s: source effects in mid-latitude geomagnetic transfer functions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27(1), 25-28.
15. Egbert, G. et al., 2007. EmScope 150, electromagnetic component of EarthScope backbone and transportable array experiments 2006-2008, EOS, Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 88(52), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract GP32A-01.
16. Frahm, G. & Jaekel, U., 2010. A generalization of Tyler's M-estimators to the case of incomplete data, Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 54(2), 374-393.
17. Fujii, I. & Schultz, A., 2002. The 3D electromagnetic response of the earth to ring current and auroral oval excitation, Geophys. J. Int., 151(3), 689-709.
18. Gabriel, K.R. & Zamir, S., 1979. Lower rank approximation of matrices by least-squares with any choice of weights, Technometrics, 21(4), 489-498.
19. Gleser, L.J., 1981. Estimation in a multivariate "errors in variables" regression model: large sample results, Ann. Statist., 9(1), 24-44.
20. Gough, D.I., McKirdy, D.M., Woods, D.V. & Geiger, H., 1989. Conductive structures and tectonics beneath the EMSLAB land array, J. geophys. Res., 94, B10, doi:10.1029/JB094iB10p14099.
21. Huber, P., 1981. Robust Statistics, Wiley, New York, NY
22. Hubert, M., Rousseeuw, P.J. & Vanden Branden, K., 2005. ROBPCA: a new approach to robust principal component analysis, Technometrics, 47(1), 64-79.
23. Kelbert, A., Schultz, A. & Egbert, G.D., 2009. Global electromagnetic induction constraints on transition-zone water content variations, Nature, 460(7258), 1003-1006.
24. Korja, T. et al., 2002. Crustal conductivity in Fennoscandia: a compilation of a database on crustal conductance in the Fennoscandian shield, Earth Planets Space, 54(5), 535-558.
25. Kuckes, A.F., Nekut, A.G. & Thompson, B.G., 1985. A geomagnetic scattering theory for evaluation of earth structure, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 83(2), 319-330.
26. Larsen, J.C., Mackie, R.L., Manzella, A., Fiordelisi, A. & Rieven, S., 1996. Robust smooth magnetotelluric transfer functions, Geophys. J. Int., 124(3), 801-819.
27. Menke, W., 1989. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory, International Geophysics Series Vol. 45, Academic Press, London
28. Olsen, N., 1998. The electrical conductivity of the mantle beneath europe derived from C-responses from 3 to 720 hr, Geophys. J. Int., 133(2), 298-308.
29. Patro, P.K. & Egbert, G.D., 2008. Regional conductivity structure of Cascadia: preliminary results from 3D inversion of USArray transportable array magnetotelluric data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35(20), L20311, doi:10.1029/2008GL035326.
30. Qian, W. & Pedersen, L.B., 1991. Industrial interference magnetotellurics: an example from the Tangshan area, China, Geophysics, 56(2), 265-273.
31. Ritter, P. & Banks, R.J., 1998. Separation of local and regional information in distorted GDS response functions by hypothetical event analysis, Geophys. J. Int., 135, 923-942, doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.t01-1-00674.x.
32. Samson, J., Jacobs, J. & Rostoker, G., 1982. Latitude dependent characteristics of long-period geomagnetic micropulsations, J. geophys. Res., 76, 3675-3683.
33. Schmucker, U., 2003. Horizontal spatial gradient sounding and geomagnetic depth sounding in the period range of daily variations, in Protokoll 20 Kolloquium Elektromagnetische Tiefenforschung in Konigstein/Elbsandsteingeb, pp. 306-317, Hördt, A. & Stoll, J., eds, Deutsche Geophysikalische Gesellschaft.
34. Serneels, S. & Verdonck, T., 2008. Principal component analysis for data containing outliers and missing elements, Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 52(3), 1712-1727.
35. Smirnov, M.Yu., 2003. Magnetotelluric data processing with a robust statistical procedure having a high breakdown point, Geophys. J. Int., 152(1), 1-7.
36. Smirnov, M.Yu., Korj, T.J. & Pedersen, L.B., 2008. Electrical conductivity of the Archaean lithosphere in Fennoscandia: results from two magnetotelluric mini arrays (EMMA project), in The 19th International Workshop on EM Induction in The Earth, Beijing, China, 2008 October 23-29.
37. Stanimirova, I., Daszykowski, M. & Walczak, B., 2007. Dealing with missing values and outliers in principal component analysis, Talanta, 72(1), 172-178.
38. Varentsov, I.M., Sokolova, E.Y. & Grp, B.W., 2003. Diagnostics and suppression of auroral distortions in the transfer operators of the electromagnetic field in the BEAR experiment, Izvestiya Phys. Sol. Earth, 39(4), 283-307.
39. Verboven, S. & Hubert, M., 2005. LIBRA: a MATLAB library for robust analysis, Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst., 75(2), 127-136.
40. Verboven, S. & Hubert, M., 2010. MATLAB library LIBRA, Wiley Interdisciplin. Rev. Computat. Statist., 2(4), 509-515.
41. Vozar, J. & Semenov, V.Y., 2010. Compatibility of induction methods for mantle soundings, J. geophys. Res., 115(B3), B03101, doi:10.1029/2009JB006390.