Prediction of daily fine particulate matter concentrations using aerosol optical depth retrievals from the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES)

Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association

Volumn 62, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1022-1031

  Chudnovsky, Alexandra A ^a   Lee, Hyung Joo ^a   Kostinski, Alex ^b   Kotlov, Tanya ^a   Koutrakis, Petros ^a  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSOLS; FORECASTING; GEOSTATIONARY SATELLITES; OPTICAL PROPERTIES; RADIOMETERS; TIME VARYING CONTROL SYSTEMS;

AEROSOL OPTICAL DEPTHS; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES; FINE PARTICULATE MATTER; GEOSTATIONARY OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITES; MODERATE RESOLUTION IMAGING SPECTRORADIOMETER; PARTICLE OPTICAL PROPERTIES; SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIABILITY; TIME VARYING PARAMETER;

PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER);

AEROSOL; AEROSOL OPTICAL DEPTH; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); METEOROLOGY; PARTICULATE MATTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TELECOMMUNICATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84865281052     PISSN: 10962247     EISSN: 21622906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2012.695321     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Engel-Cox, J., Hoff, R. and Haymet, A. 2004. Recommendations on the use of satellite remote-sensing data for urban air quality. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 54: 1360-1371.
2. Engel-Cox, J., Hoff, R., Rogers, R., Dimmick, F., Rush, A. and Szykman, J. 2006. Integrating lidar and satellite optical depth with ambient monitoring for 3-dimensional particulate characterization. Atmos. Environ., 40: 8056-8067.
3. Garrett, F., Laird, N. and Ware, J. 2004. Applied Longitudinal Analysis, New Jersey: Wiley & Sons.
4. Gupta, P., Christopher, S., Wang, J., Gehrig, R., Lee, Y. and Kumar, N. 2006. Satellite remote sensing of particulate matter and air quality assessment over global cities. Atmos. Environ., 40: 5880-5892.
5. Hoff, R. and Christopher, S. 2009. Remote sensing of particulate pollution from space: Have we reached the promised land?. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 59: 645-675. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.59.6.645
6. Kaufman, Y.J. and Fraser, R.S. 1983. Light extinction by aerosols during summer air pollution. J. Appl. Meteorol., 22: 1694-1706.
7. Kloog, I., Koutrakis, P., Coull, B., Lee, H. and Schwartz, J. 2011. Assessing temporally and spatially resolved PM2.5 exposures for epidemiological studies using satellite aerosol optical depth measurements. Atmos. Environ., 45: 6267-6275.
8. Knapp, K.R. 2002. Quantification of aerosol signal in GOES visible imagery over the U.S. J. Geophys. Res., 107: 4426 doi:10.1029/2001JD002001
9. Knapp, K.R., Frouin, R., Kondragunta, S. and Prados, A. 2005. Toward aerosol optical depth retrievals over land from GOES visible radiances: Determining surface reflectance. Int. J. Remote Sens., 26: 4097-4116.
10. Koelemeijer, R., Homan, C. and Matthijsen, J. 2006. Comparison of spatial and temporal variations of aerosol optical thickness and particulate matter over Europe. Atmos. Environ., 40: 5304-5315.
11. Kondragunta, S., Lee, P., McQueen, J., Kittaka, C., Prados, A.I., Ciren, P., Laszlo, I., Pierce, R.B., Hoff, R. and Szykman, J.J. 2008. Air quality forecast verification using satellite data. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 47: 425-442.
12. Laird, N.M. and Ware, J.H. 1982. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics., 38: 963-974. doi:10.2307/2529876
13. 2.5 concentrations. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11: 7991-8002.
14. Lindstrom, M.L. and Bates, D.M. 1988. Newton-Raphson and EM algorithms for linear mixed-effects models for repeated-measures data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 83: 1014-1021.
15. 2.5 concentrations using satellite data, meteorology, and land use information. Environ. Health Perspect., 117: 886-892.
16. 2.5 in the eastern United States using satellite remote sensing. Environ. Sci. Technol., 39: 3269-3278.
17. 2.5. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42: 5800-5806.
18. Prados, A., Kondragunta, S., Ciren, P. and Knapp, K. 2007. The GOES Aerosol/Smoke Product (GASP) over North America: Comparisons to AERONET and MODIS observations. J. Geophys. Res., 112: D15201 doi:10.1029/2006JD007968
19. 2.5 at Cabauw, The Netherlands. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9: 909-925.
20. 2.5 mass: Implications for air quality studies. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(21): 2095 doi:10.1029/2003GL018174