Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 1, Issue DEC, 2010, Pages

  Perniss, Pamela ^a   Thompson, Robin L ^a   Vigliocco, Gabriella ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Iconicity; Sound symbolism; Spoken and signed languages

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865278436     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227     Document Type: Review

References (109)

1. Adam, M., Iversen, W., Wilkinson, E., and Morford, J. P. (2007). "Meaning on the one and on the other hand: iconicity in native vs. foreign signed languages," in Insistent Images, Iconicity in Language and Literature, 5, eds E. Tabakowska, C. Ljungberg, and O. Fischer (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 211-227.
2. Alpher, B. (2001). "Ideophones in interaction with intonation and the expression of new information in some indigenous languages of Australia," in Ideophones, eds F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 9-24.
3. Armstrong, D. F. (1983). Iconicity, arbitrariness, and duality of patterning in signed and spoken language: perspectives on language evolution. Sign Lang. Studies 38, 51-69.
4. Armstrong, D. F., Stokoe, W. C., and Wilcox, S. (1995). Gesture and the Nature of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Atoda, T., and Hoshino, K. (1995). Giongo Gitaigo Tsukaikata Jiten [Usage Dictionary of Sound/Manner Mimetics]. Tokyo: Sotakusha.
6. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 577-609.
7. Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., and Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 84-91.
8. Bates, E., and MacWhinney, B. (1982). "Functionalist approaches to grammar," in Child Language: The State of the Art, eds E. Wanner and L. Gleitman (New York: Cambridge University Press), 173-218.
9. Bergen, B. K. (2004). The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Lang. 80, 290-311.
10. Berlin, B. (1994). "Evidence for pervasive synesthetic sound symbolism in ethnozoological nomenclature," in Sound Symbolism, eds L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and J. J. Ohala (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 76-103.
11. Bolinger, D. (1950). Rime, assonance, and morpheme analysis. Word, 6, 117-136.
12. Boyes-Braem, P. (1981). Significant Features of the Handshape in American Sign Language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
13. Brackbill, Y., and Little, K. B. (1957). Factors determining the guessing of meanings of foreign words. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 54, 312-318.
14. Brown, R. (1980). "Why are signed languages easier to learn than spoken languages?" in Proceedings of the First National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, ed. W. C. Stokoe (Washington, DC: National Association of the Deaf), 9-24.
15. Brown, R. W., Black, A. H., and Horowitz, A. E. (1955). Phonetic symbolism in natural languages. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 50, 388-393.
16. Bühler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion Der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
17. Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A Study of the Relation Between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Campbell, R., Martin, P., and White, T. (1992). Forced choice recognition of sign in novice learners of British sign language. Appl. Linguist. 13, 185-201.
19. Casey, S. K. (2003). "Agreement" in Gestures and Signed Languages: The Use of Directionality to Indicate Referents Involved in Actions. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
20. Childs, G. T. (1994). "African ideophones," in Sound Symbolism, eds L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and J. J. Ohala (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 178-206.
21. Chu, M., and Kita, S. (2008). Spontaneous gestures during mental rotation tasks: insights into the microdevelopment of the motor strategy. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 137, 706-723.
22. Croft, W. (1990). Typology and Universals. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Croft, W. (2003). "Typology," in Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, ed. L. Nadel (London: Nature Publishing Group), 434-440.
24. Cuxac, C. (1999). "French sign language: proposition of a structural explanation by iconicity," in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the 3rd Gesture Workshop '99 on Gesture and Sign Language in Human-Computer Interaction, eds A. Braffort, R. Gherbi, S. Gibet, J. Richardson, and D. Teil (Berlin: Springer), 165-184.
25. Diffloth, G. (1972). "The notes on expressive meaning," in Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society, eds P. M. Peranteau, J. N. Levi, and G. C. Phares, (Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society), 440-447.
26. Dingemanse, M. (in press). "Ezra pound among the mawu: ideophones and iconicity in Siwu," in Selected Proceedings of ILL 2009 (Iconicity in Language and Literature 10). eds O. Fischer and C. Ljungberg (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).
27. Emmorey, K. (2002). Language, Cognition, and the Brain: Insights from Sign Language Research. (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates).
28. Fernald, A. (1989). Intonation and communicative intent in mothers' speech to infants: is melody the message? Child Dev. 60, 1497-1510.
29. Firth, J. R. (1930). Speech. London: Benn's Sixpenny Library. Reprinted in Strevens, P. (ed.). (1964). The Tongues of Men and Speech. London: Oxford University Press.
30. Foroni, F., and Semin, G. R. (2009). Language that puts you in touch with your bodily feelings. The multimodal responsiveness of affective expressions. Psychol. Sci. 20, 974-980.
31. Friedman, L. (1976). Phonology of a Soundless Language: Phonological Structure of the American Sign Language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
32. Frishberg, N. (1975). Arbitrariness and iconicity: historical change in American sign language. Language. 51, 676-710.
33. Garrett, M. F. (1984). "The organisation of processing structure for language production: applications to aphasic speech," in Biological Perspectives on Language, eds D. Caplan, A. R. Lecours, and A. Smith (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 172-193.
34. Gasser, M. (2004). "The origins of arbitrariness in language," in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago, IL, 26.
35. Gebels, G. (1969). An investigation of phonetic symbolism in different cultures. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 8, 310-312.
36. Givón, T. (1985). "Iconicity, isomorphism, and non-arbitrary coding in syntax," in Iconicity in Syntax, ed. J. Haiman (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 187-220.
37. Givón, T. (1991). Isomorphism in the grammatical code: cognitive and biological considerations. Stud. Lang. 1, 85-114.
38. Greenberg, J. H. (1963). "Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements," in Universals of Language, ed. J. H. Greenberg (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 73-113.
39. Griffith, P. L., Robinson, J. H., and Panagos, J. M. (1981). Perception of iconicity in American sign language by hearing and deaf subjects. J. Speech Hear. Disord. 46, 388-397.
40. Haiman, J. (1980). The iconicity of grammar: isomorphism and motivation. Language 56, 515-540.
41. Haiman, J. (1985). Natural Syntax. Iconicity and Erosion. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, Vol. 44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Hamano, S. (1998). The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese. Stanford, CA: CSLI and Kuroshio.
43. Hostetter, A. B., and Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: gestures as simulated action. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 15, 495-514.
44. Hostetter, A. B., and Alibali, M. W. (2010). Language, gesture, action! A test of the gesture as simulated action framework. J. Mem. Lang. 63, 245-257.
45. Imai, M. Kita, S., Nagumo, M., and Okada, H. (2008). Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition 109, 54-65.
46. Jakobson, R., and Waugh, L. (1979). The Sound Shape of Language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
47. Joseph, B. D. (1987). On the use of iconic elements in etymological investigation: some case studies from Greek. Diachronica 4, 1-26.
48. Kelly, S. D., Özyürek, A., and Maris, E. (2010). Two sides of the same coin: speech and gesture mutually interact to enhance comprehension. Psychol. Sci. 21, 260-267.
49. Klima, E., and Bellugi, U. (1979). The Signs of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt Psychology. New York: Liveright.
51. Kovic, V., Plunkett K., and Westermann, G. (2010). The shape of words in the brain. Cognition 114, 19-28.
52. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., and Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 1-75.
54. Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Lieberth, A. K., and Gamble, M. E. B. (1991). The role of iconicity in sign language learning by hearing adults. J. Commun. Disord. 24, 89-99.
56. Maeda, T., and Maeda, K. (1983). Yoji no goihattatsu no kenkyu [Investigation of a Child's Le-xical Development]. Tokyo: Musashino Shoin.
57. Mandel, M. A. (1977). "Iconic devices in American sign language," in On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, ed. L. A. Friedman (New York: Academic Press), 57-107.
58. Maurer, D., Pathman, T., and Mondloch, C. J. (2006). The shape of boubas: sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Dev. Sci. 9, 316-322.
59. McGregor, W. (2001). "Ideophones as the source of verb in Northern Australian languages," in Ideophones, eds F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 205-211.
60. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
61. McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and Thought. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
62. McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., and McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 37, 547-559.
63. Meier, R. P. (1982). Icons, Analogues, and Morphemes: the Acquisition of Verb Agreement in American Sign Language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
64. Meier, R. P., Mauk, C. E., Cheek, A., and Moreland, C. J. (2008). The form of children's early signs: iconic or motoric determinants? Lang. Learn. Dev. 4, 63-98.
65. Meteyard, L., and Vigliocco, G. (2008). "The role of sensory and motor information in semantic representation," in Handbook of Cognitive Science: An Embodied Approach, Chapter 15, eds P. Calvo and A. Gomilla (London: Elsevier Academic Press), 291-312.
66. Mikone, E. (2001). "Ideophones in the Balto-Finnic Languages" in Ideophones, eds Voeltz, F. K. E. and C. Kilian-Hatz (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 223-233.
67. Monaghan, P., and Christiansen, M. H. (2006). "Why form-meaning mappings are not entirely arbitrary in language," in Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver.
68. Namy, L. L., Campbell, A. L., and Tomasello, M. (2004). The changing role of iconicity in non-verbal symbol learning: a U-Shaped trajectory in the acquisition of Arbitrary Gestures. J. Cogn. Dev. 5, 37-57.
69. Newmeyer, F. J. (1992). Iconicity and generative grammar. Language 68, 756-796.
70. Nuckolls, J. (1996). Sounds Like Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
71. Nygaard, L. C., Cook, A. E., and Namy, L. L. (2009). Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning. Cognition 112, 181-186.
72. Nygaard, L. C., Herold, D. S., and Namy, L. L. (2009). The semantics of prosody: listeners' use of acoustic correlates to word meaning. Cogn. Sci. 33, 127-146.
73. Ohala, J. J. (1984). An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica 41, 1-16.
74. Okrent, A. (2002). "A modality-free notion of gesture and how it can help us with the morpheme vs. gesture question in sign language linguistics (Or at least give us some criteria to work with)," in Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, eds R. P. Meier, K. Cormier, and D. Quinto-Pozos (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 175-198.
75. Orlansky, M., and Bonvillian, J. D. (1984). The role of iconicity in early sign language acquisition. J. Speech Hear. Disord. 49, 287-292.
76. Ormel, E., Hermans, D., Knoors, H., and Verhoeven, L. (2009). The role of sign phonology and iconicity during sign processing: the case of deaf children. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 14, 436-448.
77. Pietrandrea, P. (2002). Iconicity and arbitrariness in Italian sign language. Sign Lang. Studies 2, 296-321.
78. Pizzuto, E., Volterra, V. (2000). "Iconicity and transparency in sign language: a cross-linguistic cross-cultural view," in Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology to Honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima eds K. Emmorey and H. Lane (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 261-286.
79. Poizner, H., Kilma, E., and Bellugi, U. (1987). What the Hands Reveal about the Brain? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80. Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain's language. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 253-336.
81. Ramachandran, V. S., and Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia: a window into perception, thought and language. J. Conscious. Studies 8, 3-34.
82. Rizzolatti, G., and Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends Neurosci. 21, 188-194.
83. Sallandre, M.-A., and Cuxac, C. (2002). "Iconicity in sign Language: a theoretical and methodological point of view," in Gesture-based Communication in Human-Computer Interaction. Proceedings of the International Gesture Workshop (GW 2001), eds I. Wachsmuth and T. Sowa (Berlin: Springer), 171-180.
84. Sandler, W., and Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Sandler, W. (2009). Symbiotic symbolization by hand and mouth in sign language. Semiotica 174, 241-275.
86. Sapir, E. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. J. Exp. Psychol. 12, 225-239.
87. Schourup, L. (1993). "Nihongo no kakikotoba-hanashikotoba ni okeru onomatope no bunpu nitsuite [on distribution of onomatopoeias in spoken and written Japanese]," in Onomatopia: Giongo-gitaigo no Rakuen [Onomatopoeia: Paradise of Mimetics], eds H. Kakehi and I. Tamori (Tokyo: Keiso Shobo), 48-55.
88. Schultze-Berndt, E. (2001). "Ideophonelike characteristics of uninflected predicates in Jaminjung (Australia)," in Ideophones, eds F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 355-373.
89. Shintel, H., Nusbaum, H. C., and Okrent, A. (2006). Analog akoestiek espresso in speech communication. J. Mem. Lang. 55, 165-177.
90. Slobin, D. I., Hoiting, N., Kuntze, M., Lindert, R., Weinberg, A., Pyers, J., Anthony, M., Biederman, Y., and Thumann, H. (2003). "A cognitive/functional perspective on the acquisition of 'classifiers'," in Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages. ed. K. Emmorey (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), 271-296.
91. Stokoe, W. (1991). Semantic phonology. Sign Lang. Studies 71, 107-114.
92. Stokoe, W. (2001). Language in Hand: Why Sign Came Before Speech. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
93. Sutton-Spence, R. (2005). Analysing Sign Language Poetry. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
94. Taub, S. (2001). Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
95. Thompson, R. L., Emmorey, K., and Gollan, T. (2005). Tip-of-the-fingers experiences by ASL signers: insights into the organization of a sign-based lexicon. Psychol. Sci. 16, 856-860.
96. Thompson, R. L., Vinson, D. P., and Vigliocco, G. (2009). The link between form and meaning in American sign language: lexical processing effects. J. Exp. Psychol. Lang. Mem. Cogn. 35, 550-557.
97. Thompson, R. L., Vinson, D. P., and Vigliocco, G. (2010). The link between form and meaning in British sign language: lexical processing effects in a phonological decision task. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 36, 1017-1027.
98. Tolar, T. D., Lederberg, A. R., Gokhale, S., and Tomasello, M. (2008). The development of the ability to recognize the meaning of iconic signs. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 13, 225-240.
99. van der Kooij, E. (2002). Phonological Categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands. The Role of Phonetic Implementation and Iconicity. LOT, Utrecht.
100. Vigliocco, G., and Kita, S. (2006). Languagespecific effects of meaning, sound and syntax: implications for models of lexical retrieval in production. Lang. Cogn. Process. 21, 790-816.
101. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Woolfe, T., Dye, M. W., and Woll, B. (2005). Words, signs and imagery: when the language makes the difference. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 1859-1863.
102. Vinson, D. P., Cormier, K., Denmark, T., Schembri, A., and Vigliocco, G. (2008). The British sign language (BSL) norms for age of acquisition, familiarity and iconicity. Behav. Res. Methods 40, 1079-1087.
103. Walker, P. Bremner, J. G., Mason, U., Spring, J., Mattock, K., Slater, A., and Johnson, S. P. (2010). Preverbal infants' sensitivity to synaesthetic cross-modality correspondences. Psychol. Sci. 21, 21-25.
104. Watson, R. L. (2001). "A comparison of some Southeast Asian ideophones with some African ideophones," in Ideophones, eds F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 385-405.
105. Westbury, C. (2005). Implicit sound symbolism in lexical access: evidence from an interference task. Brain Lang. 93, 10-19.
106. Wilbur, R. B. (2003). Representations of telicity in ASL. Proc. Annu. Meet. Chic. Linguistic Society 39, 354-368.
107. Wilbur, R. B. (2009). Productive reduplication in ASL, a fundamentally monosyllabic language. Lang. Sci. 31, 325-342.
108. Wilcox, S. (2004). Cognitive iconicity: conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in signed languages. Cogn. Linguist. 15, 119-147.
109. Woll, B., and Sieratzki, J. S. (1998). Echo phonology: signs of a link between gesture and speech. Behav. Brain Sci. 21, 531-532.