ICT policy activism on a national level: Ideas, resources and strategies of German civil society in governance processes

New Media and Society

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 899-915

  Löblich, Maria ^a   Wendelin, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

activism; civil society; Germany; ICT policy; internet governance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865260487     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444811432427     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aigran PAccess to Knowledge in the Age of Intellectual Property. Krikorian GKapczynski A, ed. New York: Zone Books; 2010:161-174.
2. Baringhorst S.Political protest on the net.German Policy Studies. 2008;4 (4): 63-93.
3. Bennett WL.Communicating global activism: Strengths and vulnerabilities of networked politics.Information, Communication & Society. 2003;6:143-168.
4. Bennett CJThe Privacy Advocates: Resisting the Spread of Surveillance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2008:.
5. Breindl Y,Briatte F.Digital network repertoires and the contentious politics of digital copyright in France and the European Union. Paper presented at Internet, Politics, Policy 2010: An Impact Assessment conference; 2010Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford; 2010.
6. Breindl Y,Gustafsson NNexus: New Intersections in Internet Research. Araya DBreindl YHoughton TJ, ed. New York: Peter Lang; 2011:193-212.
7. Caniglia BS,Carmin J.Scholarship on social movement organizations: Classic views and emerging trends.Mobilization. 2005;10:201-212.
8. Carroll WK,Hackett RA.Democratic media activism through the lens of Social Movement Theory.Media, Culture & Society. 2006;28:83-104.
9. Chadwick AInternet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006:.
10. Eko LThe International Encyclopedia of Communication. Donsbach W, ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2008:.
11. Gamson WA,Wolfsfeld G.Movements and media as interacting systems.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1993;526:114-127.
12. Garrett RK.Protest in an information society: A review of literature on social movements and new ICTs.Information, Communication & Society. 2006;9:202-224.
13. Hackett RA,Adam M.Is media democratization a social movement?.Peace Review. 1999;11:125-131.
14. Hackett RA,Carroll WKRemaking Media. London: Routledge; 2006:.
15. Haralanova C.ICTs and Bulgarian women's rights movements.Development. 2006;49 (1): 132-133.
16. Hintz ACivil Society Media and Global Governance: Intervening into the World Summit of the Information Society. Münster: Lit; 2009:.
17. Hintz A,Milan S.At the margins of internet governance: Grassroots tech groups and communication policy.International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics. 2009;5:23-38.
18. Kapczynski A.The access to knowledge mobilization and the new politics of intellectual property.The Yale Law Journal. 2008;117:804-885.
19. Karanović J.Contentious Europeanization: The paradox of becoming European through anti-patent activism.Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology. 2010;75:252-274.
20. Kazmer MM,Xie B.Qualitative interviewing in internet studies: Playing with the media, playing with the method.Information, Communication & Society. 2008;11:257-278.
21. Kepplinger HMMediengeschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wilke J, ed. Köln: Böhlau; 1999:698-719.
22. Kern TSoziale Bewegungen: Ursachen, Wirkungen, Mechanismen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag; 2008:.
23. Krikorian G,Kapczynski AAccess to Knowledge in the Age of Intellectual Property. New York: Zone Books; 2010:.
24. Kvale S,Brinkmann SInterviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. London: Sage; 2009:.
25. Leizerov S.Privacy advocacy groups versus Intel: A case study of how social movements are tactically using the internet to fight corporations.Social Science Computer Review. 2000;18 (4): 461-483.
26. McIntyre TJ.Data retention in Ireland: Privacy, policy and proportionality.Computer Law & Security Report. 2008;24:326-334.
27. Miegel F,Olsson TDemocracy, Journalism and Technology: New Developments in an Enlarged Europe. Carpentier NPruulmann-Vengerfeldt PNorden-streng K, ed. Tartu: Tartu University Press; 2008:203-215.
28. Mueller M,Pagé C,Kuerbis B.Civil society and the shaping of communication-information policy: Four decades of advocacy.Information Society. 2004;20:169-185.
29. Napoli P.Public interest media advocacy and activism as a social movement.Communication Yearbook. 2009;33:384-429.
30. Ó Siochrú S.Civil society participation in the WSIS process: Promises and reality.Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies. 2004;18:330-344.
31. PapierHJ (2008) Das Internet vergisst nicht. Spiegel Online. Available at: http://www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/dokumentation-der-papier-rede-das-internet-vergisst-nicht-1.367248 (consulted July 2011).
32. Postigo H.Information communication technologies and framing for backfire in the digital rights movement.Social Science Computer Review. 2010;28:232-250.
33. Pradip T.The communication rights in the information society (CRIS) campaign: Applying social movement theories to an analysis of global media reform.International Communication Gazette. 2006;68 (4): 291-312.
34. Puppis M.Media governance: A new concept for the analysis of media policy and regulation.Communication, Culture & Critique. 2010;3:134-149.
35. Raboy M,Landry NCivil Society, Communication and Global Governance: Issues from the World Summit on the Information Society. New York: Lang; 2005:.
36. Rucht DCyberprotest: New Media, Citizens and Social Movements. Van de Donk WLoader BDNixon PGRucht D, ed. London and New York: Routledge; 2004:29-56.
37. Scholz SInternet-Politik in Deutschland: Vom Mythos der Unregulierbarkeit. Münster: Lit; 2004:.
38. Servaes J,Carpentier NTowards a Sustainable Information Society: Deconstructing WSIS. Bristol: Intellect; 2006:.
39. Shade LR.Public interest activism in Canadian ICT policy.Global Media Journal. 2008;1 (1): 107-121.
40. Sunstein CRRepublic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2009:.
41. Sutton J,Pollock S.Online activism for women's rights.CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2000;3 (5): 699-706.
42. Van Aelst P,Walgrave SCyberprotest: New Media, Citizens and Social Movements. Van de Donk WLoader BDNixon PGRucht D, ed. London and New York: Routledge; 2004:97-122.
43. Walker C.Data retention in the UK: Pragmatic and proportionate, or a step too far?.Computer Law & Security Review. 2009;25 (4): 325-334.