The impact of an electronic health record on nurse sensitive patient outcomes: An interrupted time series analysis

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 615-620

  Dowding, Dawn W ^a   Turley, Marianne ^b   Garrido, Terhilda ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b HIT Transformation/Analytics   (United States)

^c Kaiser Permanente   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECUBITUS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FALL RISK; FALLING; HUMAN; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; NURSING CARE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ACCIDENTAL FALLS; AGED; CALIFORNIA; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL SYSTEMS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NURSING CARE; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PRESSURE ULCER; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION;

EID: 84865179956     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000504     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. MedicExchange.com. Kaiser Permanente Completes EHR Implementation. 2010. http://www.medicexchange.com/EMR/kaiser-permanente-completes-ehr-implementation.html (accessed 7 Dec 2011).
2. Jones SS, Adams JL, Schneider EC, et al. Electronic Health Record Adoption and Quality Improvement in US Hospitals. Am J Manag Care 2010;16(12 Suppl HIT): SP64-9.
3. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Vogeli C, et al. Electronic health records' limited successes suggest more targeted uses. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:639-46.
4. McCullough JS, Casey M, Moscovice I, et al. The effect of health information technology on quality in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:647-54.
5. Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C, et al. The impact of ehealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med 2011;8:e1000387.
6. Beeuwkes Buntin M, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, et al. The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011;30:464-71.
7. Chen C, Garrido T, Chock D, et al. The Kaiser Permanente Electronic Health Record: transforming and streamlining modalities of care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:323-33.
8. Zhou Y, Unitan R, Wang J, et al. Improving population care with an electronic panel support tool. Popul Health Manag 2011;14:3-9.
9. Staggers N, Wier C, Phansalkar S. Patient safety and health information technology: role of the electronic health record. In: Hughes R, ed. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2008.
10. Forum NQ. National Voluntary Consensus Standards for Nursing-Sensitive Care: An Initial Performance Set Measure. Washington, DC: National Quality Forum, 2004.
11. Collaborative Alliance for Nursing Outcomes. 2011. https://www.calnoc.org/globalPages/mainpage.aspx (accessed 7 Dec 2011).
12. Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Cimiotti JP, et al. Implications of the California nurse staffing mandate for other states. Health Serv Res 2010;45:904-21.
13. Furukawa MF, Raghu TS, Shao BB, et al. Electronic medical records, nurse staffing, and nurse-sensitive patient outcomes: evidence from California hospitals, 1998-2007. Health Serv Res 2010;45:941-62.
14. Randell R, Dowding D. Organisational influences on nurses' use of clinical decision support systems. Int J Med Inform 2010;79:412-21.
15. Ash JS, Sittig DF, Seshadri V, et al. Adding insight: a qualitative cross-site study of physician order entry. Int J Med Inform 2005;74:623-8.
16. Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. Int J Med Inform 2001;64:143-56.
17. Heeks R. Health information systems: failure, success and improvisation. Int J Med Inform 2006;75:125-37.
18. Southon FCG, Sauer C, Dampney CNG. Information technology in complex health services. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997;4:112-24.
19. Tsiknakis M, Kouroubali A. Organizational factors affecting successful adoption of innovative eHealth services: a case study employing the FITT framework. Int J Med Inform 2009;78:39-52.
20. Singer S, Lin S, Falwell A, et al. Relationship of safety climate and safety performance in hospitals. Health Serv Res 2009;44:399-421.
21. Rosen AK, Singer S, Zhao S, et al. Hospital safety climate and safety outcomes: is there a relationship in the VA? Med Care Res Rev 2010;67:590-608.
22. Sammer CE, Lykens K, Singh KP, et al. What is patient safety culture? A review of the literature. J Nurs Scholarsh 2010;42:156-65.
23. Bush H. Collaboration and Staff Empowerment Drive Kaiser Quality Gains. Hospitals & Health Networks, 2011. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Collaboration+and+staff+empowerment+drive+Kaiser+quality+gains.-a0248092615 (accessed 7 Dec 2011).
24. Dowding D, Mitchell N, Randell R, et al. Nurses' use of computerised clinical decisions support systems: a case site analysis. J Clin Nurs 2009;18:1159-67.
25. Kawamoto K, Houlihan C, Balas A, et al. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005;330:765-72.
26. Dykes PC, Carroll DL, Hurley A, et al. Fall prevention in acute care hospitals: a randomized trial. JAMA 2010;304:1912-18.
27. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. 5 Million Lives Campaign. http://www.ihi.org/offerings/Initiatives/PastStrategicInitiatives/5MillionLivesCampaign/Pages/default.aspx (accessed 7 Dec 2011).
28. Shorr R, Mion L, Chandler A, et al. Improving the capture of fall events in hospitals: combining a service for evaluating inpatient falls with an incident report system. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:701-4.