Birth in Brazil: National survey into labour and birth

Reproductive Health

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Do Carmo Leal, Maria ^a   Da Silva, Antônio Augusto Moura ^b   Dias, Marcos Augusto Bastos ^a   Da Gama, Silvana Granado Nogueira ^a   Rattner, Daphne ^c   Moreira, Maria Elizabeth ^a   Filha, Mariza Miranda Theme ^a   Domingues, Rosamariasoaresmadeira ^a   Pereira, Ana Paula Esteves ^a   Torres, Jacqueline Alves ^d   Bittencourt, Sonia Duarte Azevedo ^a   Dorsi, Eleonora ^e   Cunha, Antonio J L A ^f   Leite, Alvaro Jorge Madeiro ^g   Cavalcante, Rejane Silva ^h   Lansky, Sonia ⁱ   Diniz, Carmem Simone Grilo ^j   Szwarcwald, Célia Landmann ^k  

^a INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MARANHÃO   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA   (Brazil)

^d MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE   (Brazil)

^e FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^f FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^g FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF CEARÁ   (Brazil)

^h FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARÁ   (Brazil)

ⁱ Secretaria Municipal de Saude de Belo Horizonte   (Brazil)

^j UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^k Brazil   (Brazil)

more..

Author keywords

Brazil; Caesarean section; Elective Caesarean section; Low birth weight; Near miss maternal morbidity; Near miss neonatal morbidity; Prematurity; Robsons groups

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BIRTH RATE; BRAZIL; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFANT; LABOR; LABOR INDUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSTETRIC PROCEDURE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BRAZIL; BREAST FEEDING; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; LABOR, INDUCED; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; MATERNAL MORTALITY; PAIN; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84865173462     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17424755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-9-15     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Maternal and child health in Brazil: progress and challenges. Victora CG, Aquino EM, do Carmo Leal M, Monteiro CA, Barros FC, Szwarcwald CL, Lancet 2011 377 9780 1863 1876 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60138-4 21561656
2. Sistema de Informações sobre Nascidos Vivos (SINASC) http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?sinasc/cnv/nvuf.def
3. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A, Shah A, Campodonico L, Bataglia V, Faundes A, et al. Lancet 2006 367 9525 1819 1829 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68704- 7 16753484
4. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, Donner A, Wojdyla D, Faundes A, Velazco A, Bataglia V, Langer A, Narvaez A, et al. Bmj 2007 335 7628 1025 10.1136/bmj.39363.706956.55 17977819
5. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: the impact on mother and newborn. Lee YM, DAlton ME, Clin Perinatol 2008 35 3 505 518 x 10.1016/j.clp.2008.07.006 18952018
6. Association between method of delivery and puerperal infectious complications in the perinatal database of Baden-Wurttemberg 1998-2001. Simoes E, Kunz S, Bosing-Schwenkglenks M, Schmahl FW, Gynecol Obstet Invest 2005 60 4 213 217 10.1159/000087208 16088198
7. Risk of complications in a second pregnancy following caesarean section in the first pregnancy: a population-based study. Taylor LK, Simpson JM, Roberts CL, Olive EC, Henderson-Smart DJ, Med J Aust 2005 183 10 515 519 16296964
8. Admission of term infants to neonatal intensive care: a population-based study. Tracy SK, Tracy MB, Sullivan E, Birth 2007 34 4 301 307 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00188.x 18021145
9. Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective caesarean section: cohort study. Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, Henriksen TB, Bmj 2008 336 7635 85 87 10.1136/bmj.39405.539282.BE 18077440
10. Nonspontaneous late preterm birth: etiology and outcomes. Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Fuchs KM, Young OM, Hoffman MK, Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011 205 5 451 e456 456
11. Impact of cesarean section on neonatal mortality rates among very preterm infants in the United States, 2000-2003. Malloy MH, Pediatrics 2008 122 2 285 292 10.1542/peds.2007-2620 18676545
12. Impact of cesarean section on intermediate and late preterm births: United States, 2000-2003. Malloy MH, Birth 2009 36 1 26 33 10.1111/j.1523-536X. 2008.00292.x 19278380
13. Differences in mortality between late-preterm and term singleton infants in the United States, 1995-2002. Tomashek KM, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Davidoff MJ, Petrini JR, J Pediatr 2007 151 5) 450 456 456 e451 17961684
14. Association of preterm birth with long-term survival, reproduction, and next-generation preterm birth. Swamy GK, Ostbye T, Skjaerven R, Jama 2008 299 12 1429 1436 10.1001/jama.299.12.1429 18364485
15. Baixo peso ao nascer no Brasil de acordo com as informações sobre nascidos vivos do Ministério da Saúde, 2005. Andrade CLT, Szwarcwald CL, Castilho EA, Cadernos de Saúde Pública 2008 24 11 2564 2572
16. Factors associated with preterm births in southeast Brazil: a comparison of two birth cohorts born 15years apart. Bettiol H, Rona RJ, Chinn S, Goldani M, Barbieri MA, Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2000 14 1 30 38 10.1046/j.1365-3016. 2000.00222.x 10703032
17. Fatores associados à morbi-mortalidade perinatal em uma amostra de maternidades públicas e privadas do Município do Rio de Janeiro, 1999-2001. Leal MC, Gama SGN, Campos MR, Cavalini LT, Garbayo LS, Brasil CLP, Szwarcwald CL, Cadernos de Saúde Pública 2004 20 20 S33
18. Preterm births, low birth weight, and intrauterine growth restriction in three birth cohorts in Southern Brazil: 1982, 1993 and 2004. Barros FC, Victora CG, Matijasevich A, Santos IS, Horta BL, Silveira MF, Barros AJ, Cad Saude Publica 2008 24 Suppl 3 390 398 18797714
19. The challenge of reducing neonatal mortality in middle-income countries: findings from three Brazilian birth cohorts in 1982, 1993, and 2004. Barros FC, Victora CG, Barros AJ, Santos IS, Albernaz E, Matijasevich A, Domingues MR, Sclowitz IK, Hallal PC, Silveira MF, et al. Lancet 2005 365 9462 847 854 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71042-4 15752528
20. Trends in low birth weight: a comparison of two birth cohorts separated by a 15-year interval in Ribeirao Preto, Brazil. Silva AA, Barbieri MA, Gomes UA, Bettiol H, Bull World Health Organ 1998 76 1 73 84 9615499
21. Can we explain why Brazilian babies are becoming lighter? Silva AA, Barbieri MA, Bettiol H, Goldani MZ, Rona RJ, Int J Epidemiol 2004 33 4 821 828 10.1093/ije/dyh101 15155702
22. Trajetória das mulheres na definição pelo parto cesáreo: estudo de caso em duas unidades do sistema de saúde suplementar do estado do Rio de Janeiro. Dias MAB, Domingues RMSM, Pereira APE, Fonseca SC, Gama SGN, Theme Filha MM, Bittencourt SDA, Rocha PMM, Schilithz AOC, Leal MC, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 2008 13 1521 1534 23043203
23. Risk factors for low birthweight in north-east Brazil: the role of caesarean section. Silva AA, Lamy-Filho F, Alves MT, Coimbra LC, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA, Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001 15 3 257 264 10.1046/j.1365-3016. 2001.00358.x 11489154
24. Are Brazilian women really choosing to deliver by cesarean? Hopkins K, Soc Sci Med 2000 51 5 725 740 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00480-3 10975232
25. Intrapartum elective cesarean delivery: a previously unrecognized clinical entity. Kalish RB, McCullough L, Gupta M, Thaler HT, Chervenak FA, Obstet Gynecol 2004 103 6 1137 1141 10.1097/01.AOG.0000128118.37737.df 15172844
26. Risk factors for the increasing caesarean section rate in Southeast Brazil: a comparison of two birth cohorts, 1978-1979 and 1994. Gomes UA, Silva AA, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA, Int J Epidemiol 1999 28 4 687 694 10.1093/ije/28.4.687 10480697
27. Desigualdades raciais, sociodemográficas e na assistência ao pré-natal e ao parto, 1999-2001. Leal MC, Gama SGN, Cunha CB, Revista de Saude Publica 2005 39 100 107 10.1590/S0034-89102005000100013 15654466
28. [Social inequalities in cesarean section rates in primiparae, Southern Brazil]. Freitas PF, Drachler Mde L, Leite JC, Grassi PR, Rev Saude Publica 2005 39 5 761 767 16254652
29. Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods. Behague DP, Victora CG, Barros FC, Bmj 2002 324 7343 942 945 10.1136/bmj.324.7343.942 11964338
30. Classification of caesarean sections. Robson MS, Fetal Matern Med Rev 2001 12 1 23 39
31. WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America: classifying caesarean sections. Betran AP, Gulmezoglu AM, Robson M, Merialdi M, Souza JP, Wojdyla D, Widmer M, Carroli G, Torloni MR, Langer A, et al. Reprod Health 2009 6 18 10.1186/1742-4755-6-18 19874598
32. The World Health Organization multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health: study protocol. Souza JP, Gulmezoglu AM, Carroli G, Lumbiganon P, Qureshi Z, Research Group W, BMC Health Serv Res 2011 11 1 286 10.1186/1472-6963-11-286 22029735
33. The research implications of the selection of a gestational age estimation method. Lynch CD, Zhang J, Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007 21 Suppl 2 86 96 17803622
34. A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age. Kramer MS, Platt RW, Wen SW, Joseph KS, Allen A, Abrahamowicz M, Blondel B, Breart G, Pediatrics 2001 108 2 35 10.1542/peds.108.2.e35 11483845
35. Why are the low birthweight rates in Brazil higher in richer than in poorer municipalities? Exploring the epidemiological paradox of low birthweight. Silva AA, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA, Pereira MM, Brito LG, Ribeiro VS, Aragao VM, Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2005 19 1 43 49 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2004.00624.x 15670108
36. Little RJA, Rubin DB, Statistical analysis with missing data New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons 2 2002
37. Neonatal near miss: a measure of the quality of obstetric care. Avenant T, Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009 23 3 369 374 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008. 12.005 19201262
38. Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa (ABEP), Adoção do CCEB 2008 São Paulo: Critério de Classificação Econômica Brasil 2008 http://www.abep.org/novo/ FileGenerate.ashx?id=270. 23034212
39. Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica. Indicadores sociais mínimos (conceitos/cor ou raça). IBGE, In Edited by Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Rio de Janeiro 1997
40. Socioeconomic differentials in caesarean rates in developing countries: a retrospective analysis. Ronsmans C, Holtz S, Stanton C, Lancet 2006 368 9546 1516 1523 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69639-6 17071285
41. Caesarean birth as a component of surgical services in low- and middle-income countries. Stanton C, Ronsmans C, Bull World Health Organ 2008 86 12 19142282
42. Cesarean delivery in the developing world. Wylie BJ, Mirza FG, Clin Perinatol 2008 35 3 571 582 xii 10.1016/j.clp.2008.06.002 18952023
43. High caesarean rates in Madras (India): a population-based cross sectional study. Sreevidya S, Sathiyasekaran BW, Bjog 2003 110 2 106 111 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02006.x 12618152
44. The impact of hospital revenue on the increase in Caesarean sections in Norway. A panel data analysis of hospitals 1976-2005. Grytten J, Monkerud L, Hagen TP, Sorensen R, Eskild A, Skau I, BMC Health Serv Res 2011 11 267 10.1186/1472-6963-11-267 21992174
45. Dramatic increase of Cesarean deliveries in the midst of health reforms in rural China. Bogg L, Huang K, Long Q, Shen Y, Hemminki E, Soc Sci Med 2010 70 10 1544 1549 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.026 20219278
46. Cesarean section delivery among primiparous women in rural China: an emerging epidemic. Klemetti R, Che X, Gao Y, Raven J, Wu Z, Tang S, Hemminki E, Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010 202 1 1 6 65 20510970
47. Delivery settings and caesarean section rates in China. Sufang G, Padmadas SS, Fengmin Z, Brown JJ, Stones RW, Bull World Health Organ 2007 85 10 755 762 10.2471/BLT.06.035808 18038056
48. Patterns of deliveries in a Brazilian birth cohort: almost universal cesarean sections for the better-off. Barros AJ, Santos IS, Matijasevich A, Domingues MR, Silveira M, Barros FC, Victora CG, Revista de saude publica 2011 45 4 635 643 10.1590/S0034-89102011005000039 21670862
49. Significant differences in cesarean section rates between a private and a public hospital in Brazil. Almeida S, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA, Silva AA, Ribeiro VS, Cadernos de saude publica / Ministerio da Saude, Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Nacional de Saude Publica 2008 24 12 2909 2918 10.1590/S0102- 311X2008001200020 19082282