Requirements for automated enterprise architecture model maintenance: A requirements analysis based on a literature review and an exploratory survey

ICEIS 2011 - Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

Volumn 4 SAIC, Issue HCI/-, 2011, Pages 325-337

  Farwick, Matthias ^a   Agreiter, Berthold ^a   Breu, Ruth ^a   Ryll, Steffen ^b   Voges, Karsten ^b   Hanschke, Inge ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^b ITERATEC GMBH   (Germany)

Author keywords

EAM; Enterprise architecture management; Enterprise information integration; Model evolution; Model maintenance

Indexed keywords

EAM; ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE MANAGEMENTS; ENTERPRISE INFORMATION INTEGRATION; MODEL EVOLUTION; MODEL MAINTENANCE;

AUTOMATION; INDUSTRY; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SURVEYS;

MAINTENANCE;

EID: 84865153390     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Ambler, S. W. (2010). Enterprise architecture survey results. http://www.ambysoft.com/surveys/stateOfITUnion201001.html last retrieved 12/29/2010.
2. Breu, R. (2010). Ten principles for living models - a manifesto of change-driven software engineering. In 4th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS-2010).
3. Buckl, S., Dierl, T., Matthes, F., Ramacher, R., and Schweda, C. (2008). Current and future tool support for ea management. In Proceedings of Workshop MDD, SOA und IT-Management (MSI 2008), Oldenburg, Gito.
4. Buckl, S., Ernst, A., Matthes, F., and Schweda, C. (2009a). An information model for managed application landscape evolution. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 5(1):12-26.
5. Buckl, S., Ernst, A. M., Lankes, J., Matthes, F., and Schweda, C. M. (2009b). State of the art in enterprise architecture management. Technical report, Chair for Informatics 19, Technical University Munich, Germany.
6. Buckl, S., Matthes, F., and Schweda, C. M. (2010). Future Research Topics in Enterprise Architecture Management-A Knowledge Management Perspective, pages 1-11. Springer.
7. Chief Information Officers Council (2007). FEA Consolidated Reference Model Document Version 2.3.
8. Dam, H. K., Le, L.-S., and Ghose, A. (2010). Supporting change propagation in the evolution of enterprise architectures. In 2010 14th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pages 24-33. IEEE.
9. De Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M., Groenewegen, L., Stam, A., Stevens, S., and Van Der Torre, L. (2005). Change impact analysis of enterprise architectures. In Information Reuse and Integration, Conf, 2005. IRI-2005 IEEE International Conference on., pages 177-181. IEEE. (Pubitemid 43996544)
10. DMTF (2010). Configuration management database (cmdb) federation specification - dsp0252 1.0.1.
11. Farwick, M., Agreiter, B., Breu, R., Ha andring, M., Voges, K., and Hanschke, I. (2010). Towards living landscape models: Automated integration of infrastructure cloud in enterprise architecture management. In Cloud Computing (CLOUD), 2010 IEEE 3rd International Conference on, pages 35-42.
12. Fischer, R., Aier, S., and Winter, R. (2007). A federated approach to enterprise architecture model maintenance. Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures, 2(2):14-22.
13. Hafner, M. and Winter, R. (2008). Processes for enterprise application architecture management. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the 41st Annual. IEEE.
14. Hanschke, I. (2009). Strategic IT Management: A Toolkit for Enterprise Architecture Management. Springer.
15. IEEE Computer Society (2000). Ieee recommended practice for architectural description of software intensive systems (ieee std 1471-2000).
16. Konstantinou, A. and Yemini, Y. (2009). A2A: An architecture for autonomic management coordination. Integrated Management of Systems, Services, Processes and People in IT, pages 85-98.
17. Kumar, A., Raghavan, P., Ramanathan, J., and Ramnath, R. (2008). Enterprise interaction ontology for change impact analysis of complex systems. In 2008 IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference, pages 303-309. Ieee.
18. Lankhorst, M. (2005). Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis. Springer, Berlin.
19. Moser, C., Junginger, S., Brückmann, M., and Schöne, K. (2009). Some process patterns for enterprise architecture management. In Proceedings, Workshop on Patterns in Enterprise Architecture Management (PEAM2009), Bonn, pages 19-30.
20. OGC (2007). ITIL Lifecycle Publication Suite Books, 2nd impression. TSO.
21. Saat, J., Winter, R., Franke, U., Lagerstroem, R., and Ekstedt, M. (2011). Analysis of it/business alignment situations as a precondition for the design and engineering of situated it/business alignment solutions. In Proc. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-44). (January 2011).
22. Tanner, A. and Feridun, M. (2009). Fusio: Semantic integration of systems management and enterprise information. Technical report, IBM Research GmbH Zurich Research Laboratory.
23. ter Doest, H. and Lankhorst, M. (2004). Tool support for enterprise architecture - a vision. Technical report, Telematica Instituut, Enschede.
24. The Open Group (2009). The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) version 9.
25. US Department of Defense (2010). The DoDAF Architecture Framework Version 2.02.
26. Wilson, C. (2010). Gartner - magic quadrant for enterprise architecture tools.
27. Winter, K., Buckl, S., Matthes, F., and Schweda, C. (2010). Investigating the state-of-the-art in enterprise architecture management methods in literature and practice. In MCIS 2010 Proceedings.
28. Winter, R. and Fischer, R. (2007). Essential layers, artifacts, and dependencies of enterprise architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, pages 1-12.
29. Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3):276-292.