How to choose the simulation model for computer experiments: A local approach

Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 354-361

  Mühlenstädt, Thomas ^a   Gösling, Marco ^a   Kuhnt, Sonja ^a  

^a TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

computer code validation; computer experiment; Gaussian process model; kernel interpolation; sheet metal forming

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CODE VALIDATION; COMPUTER EXPERIMENT; DESIGN POINTS; DESIGN SPACES; FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATIONS; GAUSSIAN PROCESS MODELS; LOCAL APPROACHES; META MODEL; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION INTERPOLATION; SIMULATION MODEL;

DESIGN AIDS; EXPERIMENTS; INTERPOLATION; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS; SHEET METAL; STOCHASTIC MODELS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 84865149121     PISSN: 15241904     EISSN: 15264025     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asmb.909     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Fang KT, Li R, Sudjianto A,. Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments, Chapman & Hall: New York, 2006.
2. Bayarri MJ, Berger JO, Paulo R, Sacks J, Cafeo JA, Cavendish J, Lin C-H, Tu J,. A framework for validation of computer models. Technometrics 2007; 49: 138-154, DOI: 10.1198/004017007000000092. (Pubitemid 46799915)
3. Mühlenstädt T, Gather U,. Permutation tests for validating computer experiments, In Statistical Inference, Econometric Analysis and Matrix Algebra. Festschrift in Honour of Götz Trenkler, Vol. 77, Schipp B, Krämer W, (eds), Physica-Verlag: Heidelberg, 2008, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-2121-5-5.
4. Kennedy MC, O'Hagan A,. Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available. Biometrika 2000; 87: 1-13, DOI: 10.1093/biomet/87.1.1.
5. Quian PZG, Wu CFJ,. Bayesian hierarchical modeling for integrating low-accuracy and high-accuracy experiments. Technometrics 2008; 50: 192-204, DOI: 10.1198/004017008000000082.
6. Gösling M, Kracker H, Grosius A, Gather U, Tekkaya AE,. Study of the influence of input parameters on a springback prediction by FEA, Proceedings of the IDDRG 2007, 2007; 397.
7. Atkinson AC, Donev AN,. Optimum Experimental Designs, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1992.
8. Myers RH, Montgomery DC,. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, Wiley: New York, 1995.
9. Santner TJ, Williams BJ, Notz WI,. The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments, Springer: New York, 2003.
10. Buhmann MD,. Radial basis functions. Acta Numerica 2000; 9: 1-38.
11. Mühlenstädt T, Kuhnt S,. Kernel interpolation. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2011, DOI: 10.1016/j.csda2011.05.001.
12. Okabe A, Boots B, Sugihara K, Chiu SN,. Spatial Tessellations, Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley: Chichester, 2000. DOI: 10.1002/9780470317013.oth1.
13. Van der Vaart AW,. Asymptotic Statistics, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1998.