Minimally invasive enzyme microprobes: An alternative approach for continuous glucose monitoring

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 479-480

  Moniz, Anna Radomska Bothelo ^a   Michelakis, Kostis ^a   Trzebinski, Jakub ^a,b   Sharma, Sanjiv ^a   Johnston, Desmond G ^a   Oliver, Nick ^a   Cass, Anthony ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Continuous glucose monitor; Diabetes; Electrochemistry; Glucose monitoring

Indexed keywords

1 (3 DIMETHYLAMINOPROPYL) 3 ETHYLCARBODIIMIDE; 3 HYDROXYBUTYRATE DEHYDROGENASE; GLUCOSE; GLUCOSE OXIDASE; LACTATE 2 MONOOXYGENASE; N HYDROXYSUCCINIMIDE; TETRATHIAFULVALENE DERIVATIVE; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CAPILLARY BLOOD; CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; EPIDERMIS; GLUCOSE SENSOR; ILLUMINATION; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERSTITIAL FLUID; INTERSTITIUM; LETTER; MICRONEEDLE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE ENZYME MICROPROBE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PHOTOLITHOTROPH; STRATUM CORNEUM; ALGORITHM; CALIBRATION; ELECTRONICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EXTRACELLULAR FLUID; GENETIC PROCEDURES; INSTRUMENTATION; METABOLISM; MONITORING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STANDARD; TIME; TRANSDUCER;

ALGORITHMS; BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; CALIBRATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EXTRACELLULAR FLUID; GLUCOSE; GLUCOSE OXIDASE; MINIATURIZATION; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TRANSDUCERS;

EID: 84865124940     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/193229681200600239     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group, Tamborlane WV, Beck RW, Bode BW, Buckingham B, Chase HP, Clemons R, Fiallo-Scharer R, Fox LA, Gilliam LK, Hirsch IB, Huang ES, Kollman C, Kowalski AJ, Laffel L, Lawrence JM, Lee J, Mauras N, O'Grady M, Ruedy KJ, Tansey M, Tsalikian E, Weinzimer S, Wilson DM, Wolpert H, Wysocki T, Xing D. Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(14):1464-76.
2. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group, Beck RW, Hirsch IB, Lafel L, Tamborlane WV, Bode BW, Buckingham B, Chase P, Clemons R, Fiallo-Scharer R, Fox LA, Gilliam LK, Huang ES, Kollman C, Kowalski AJ, Lawrence JM, Lee J, Mauras N, O'Grady M, Ruedy KJ, Tansey M, Tsalikian E, Weinzimer SA, Wilson DM, Wolpert H, Wysocki T, Xing D. The efect of continuous glucose monitoring in well-controlled type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(8):1378-83.
3. Mukerjee EV, Collins SD, Isserof RR, Smith RL. Microneedle array for transdermal biological fluid extraction and in situ analysis. Sens Actuat A Phys. 2004;114(2-3):267-75.
4. Noh YW, Kim TH, Baek JS, Park HH, Lee SS, Han M, Shin SC, Cho CW. In vitro characterization of the invasiveness of polymer microneedle against skin. Int J Pharm. 2010;397(1-2):201-5.
5. Oliver NS, Toumazou C, Cass AE, Johnston DG. Glucose sensors: a review of current and emerging technology. Diabet Med. 2009;26(3):197-210.
6. Kim K, Park DS, Lu HM, Che W, Kim K, Lee JB, Ahn CH. A tapered hollow metallic microneedle array using backside exposure of su-8. J Micromech Microeng. 2004;14(4):597-603.