Do neurons generate monopolar current sources?

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 108, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 953-955

  Destexhe, Alain ^a   Bedard, Claude ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM ION; POTASSIUM ION;

BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; BRAIN NERVE CELL; EDITORIAL; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LOCAL FIELD POTENTIAL; MICROELECTRODE; NERVE CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; NEURONS; SYNAPSES;

EID: 84865092983     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00357.2012     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. Bédard C, Destexhe A. A modified cable formalism for modeling neuronal membranes at high frequencies. Biophys J 94: 1133-1143, 2008.
2. Bédard C, Destexhe A. Generalized theory for current-source density analysis in brain tissue. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 84: 041909, 2011.
3. Dehghani N, Cash SS, Rossetti AO, Chen CC, Halgren E. Magnetoencephalography demonstrates multiple asynchronous generators during human sleep spindles. J Neurophysiol 104: 179-188, 2010a.
4. Dehghani N, Cash SS, Chen CC, Hagler DJ Jr, Huang M, DaleAM and Halgren E. Divergent cortical generators of MEG and EEG during human sleep spindles suggested by distributed source modeling. PLos One 5: e11454, 2010b.
5. Fernandes JM Martins da Silva A, Huiskamp G., Velis DN, Manshanden I, de Munck JC, Lopes da Silva F, Silva Cunha JP. What does an epileptiform spike look like in MEG? Comparison between coincident EEG and MEG spikes. J Clin Neurophysiol 22: 68-73, 2005.
6. Hille B. Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 2001.
7. Huiskamp G, van der Meij W, van Huffelen A, van Nieuwenhuizen O. High resolution spatio-temporal EEG-MEG analysis of Rolandic spikes. J Clin Neurophysiol 21: 84-95, 2004.
8. Hunt MJ, Falinska M, Leski S, Wojcik DK, Kasicki S. Differential effects produced by ketamine on oscillatory activity recorded in the rat hippocampus, dorsal striatum and nucleus accumbens. J Psychopharmacol 25: 808-821, 2011.
9. Jones SR, Pritchett DL, Stufflebeam SM, Hämäläi{dotless}nen M, Moore CI. Neural correlates of tactile detection: a combined magnetoencephalography and biophysically based computational modeling study. J Neurosci 27: 10751-10764, 2007.
10. Lorente de No R. Analysis of the distribution of the action currents of nerve in volume conductors. Stud Rockefeller Inst Med Res Repr 132: 384-477, 1947.
11. Nicholson C, Freeman JA. Theory of current source-density analysis and determination of conductivity tensor for anuran cerebellum. J Neurophysiol 38: 356-368, 1975.
12. Philip M, Bolton W. Technology of Engineering Materials. New York: Elsevier, 2002.
13. Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int J Psychophysiol 18: 49-65, 1994.
14. Pascual-Marqui RD, Esslen M, Kochi K, Lehmann D. Functional imaging with low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 108: 953-955, 2002.
15. Ramirez RR. Source localization. In: Scholarpedia. http://www.scholarpedia. org/article/Source Localization, 2008, p. 1733.
16. Riera J, Ogawa T, Goto T, Sumiyoshi A, Nonaka H, Evans A, Miyakawa H, Kawashima R. Pitfalls in the dipolar model for the neocortical EEG sources. J Neurophysiol; published ahead of print April 25, 2012, doi: 10.1152/jn.00098.2011.