Quality measures and practice guidelines: Are they being embraced by cardiologists?

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 641-642

  Beller, George A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOLOGIST; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DISEASE SEVERITY; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALARY; STANDARDIZATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; CARDIOLOGY; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PUBLICATIONS; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 84865082794     PISSN: 10713581     EISSN: 15326551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-012-9591-0     Document Type: Editorial

References (2)

1. Medscape Cardiologist Compensation Report, Medscape Cardiology News. http//www.medscape.com/features/slideshow/compensa tion/2012/cardiology. Accessed April 27, 2012.
2. Beller GA. Tests that may be overused or misused in cardiology: The Choosing Wisely Campaign. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19:401-3.